Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Player dying the field in Cincinnati
Comments
-
Point to me a real investigation. I'll wait. 2000 Mules was already taken so you will need an alternative. Don't hurt yourself.MelloDawg said:
Agreed. Good thing there was one of those, though I get that “a real investigation” means “provide me the confirmation bias I need.”WestlinnDuck said:
Like looking into election fraud, some people don't want to ask and don't want to know. Statistical anomalies can be just that. They can also direct an intellectually curious person into further investigation. When the first party strongly resists that investigation, that is further evidence that there should be an investigation - a real investigation.pawz said:
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?whatshouldicareabout said:
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".EsophagealFeces said:
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.Dude61 said:
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough, is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps. -
I’ve never understood why vax believers become so defensive when confronted with the fact that many of the things their overlords told them about COVID and what needed to be done in the name of science turned out to be BS.
Denial?
Embarrassment?
Stupidity?
Herd mentality?
Pride?
Virtue?
Blissful ignorance?
All of the above. -
Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Seem like words to live by if you were an intellectually curious person who wanted honest answers. That leaves out every dem and dem voter. When your life goal is to have people sh*t in your mouth, then you are all set.46XiJCAB said:I’ve never understood why vax believers become so defensive when confronted with the fact that many of the things their overlords told them about COVID and what needed to be done in the name of science turned out to be BS.
Denial?
Embarrassment?
Stupidity?
Herd mentality?
Pride?
Virtue?
Blissful ignorance?
All of the above. -
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.pawz said:
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?whatshouldicareabout said:
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".EsophagealFeces said:
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.Dude61 said:
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different? -
You should care. The chicom crud was less deadly to school age Americans than the flu, you could just look at the published CDC stats to get that. That was the epidemiology. The biostatics on the mRNA vaxxes were not developed and when they were the were suppressed. I'm not a cardiologist, but I can tell you giving the vaxx to a 5 year old is medical malpractice.whatshouldicareabout said:
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. Sure, but they weren't for some reason. And they are being asked now, with no answers. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.pawz said:
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?whatshouldicareabout said:
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".EsophagealFeces said:
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.Dude61 said:
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population. Yes, it does. Questions like why was the entire US medical bureaucracy sucking Pfizer and Fow Chee's dick and actively, along with the entire US MSM and social media suppressing legitimate questions. It isn't how it should operate but as long as dems and dem voters want it to be this way it will.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
Then toss in the active suppression of viable therapeutics which carried no risk and preventives and replace it with put on a worthless mask and when you get sick, take a Tylenol and wait for your assigned ventilator if you were a high risk person was also evil. I don't get how Americans can be so sanguine about how the US helped fund chicom gain of function research on bat viruses in a substandard Wuhan bio lab and then when it was released to the world population the majority response was to follow incompetent US medical bureaucrats like sheep and then after it all done just tell me that's the way it is.
-
Remember when Cheney said the most patriotic thing we could do after 9/11 was buy stock?PurpleThrobber said:I'm trying to figure out how donating to this dude's toy drive somehow helps his condition.
Similar "just do something" need being filled here, but far more benevolent.
I'm good with it. And when he wakes up - fingers crossed - it'll make him happy, I'm sure.
Nothing wrong with that. -
Been following this stuff closely since 2020. Recent studies are showing Covid-related Myocarditis is much rarer than previously thought and presented in the media.LawDawg1 said:As stated in another post.... how does the argument ignore the fact COVID19 has shown to also increase heart inflammation and myocarditis? Unless you can establish that an athlete (1) had the Vaxx and (2) never had COVID19, these studies or data points are meaningless. Was it the vaxx? Was it prior exposure to COVID? Was it something else? I hate the pro and anti-vaxxers.... but these arguments lack logic.
Not conclusive, but trending away from Covid19 as a major cause of Myocarditis in young people. -
In theory, wouldn't a cardiologist be a better source of understanding and identifying side effects that effect the heart than an epidemiologist?whatshouldicareabout said:
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.pawz said:
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?whatshouldicareabout said:
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".EsophagealFeces said:
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.Dude61 said:
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
-
About 2 years ago, as I recall, I posted the spreadsheets showing King County cases and deaths. When I realized only 3 people in my Zip Code had died of Covid during a 9 month period, and 2 were in their 80s, I began to question the panic, the masks, the fear, and the absurdity of the county's Covid response.Bob_C said:From your King County overlords. Regardless if this is vaccine related or not, pushing it on young people was fucking stupid. In theory, unlimited risk with no reward.
It didn't make sense then, and it doesn't make sense now.
Was a 1% death rate - if you caught the Vid (.03 overall) ever worth what our government put us through? And how effective was our collective response?
-
The chicom crud or the mRNA vaxxes? Seems pretty clear that the vaxxes are a much higher risk to young people than the Wuhan flu.TurdBomber said:
Been following this stuff closely since 2020. Recent studies are showing Covid-related Myocarditis is much rarer than previously thought and presented in the media.LawDawg1 said:As stated in another post.... how does the argument ignore the fact COVID19 has shown to also increase heart inflammation and myocarditis? Unless you can establish that an athlete (1) had the Vaxx and (2) never had COVID19, these studies or data points are meaningless. Was it the vaxx? Was it prior exposure to COVID? Was it something else? I hate the pro and anti-vaxxers.... but these arguments lack logic.
Not conclusive, but trending away from Covid19 as a major cause of Myocarditis in young people. -
Essentially, this is a database review which is a common form of surveillance to try to identify correlation between exposure and outcome. It doesn't appear to be more than identifying a statistic that an event happened (cardiac arrest) in an athlete (source population) given the vaccine (exposure). There would need to be control for confounding variables (race, age, gender, what sport they played, how long they played, etc.) to isolate how strong the outcome is correlated to the exposure. If the paper were more about reviewing the cases and determining whether a case was legitimately cardiac arrest or some other major cardiac event, then the cardiologist would be a much better fit.Bob_C said:
In theory, wouldn't a cardiologist be a better source of understanding and identifying side effects that effect the heart than an epidemiologist?whatshouldicareabout said:
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.pawz said:
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?whatshouldicareabout said:
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".EsophagealFeces said:
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.Dude61 said:
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
To me, one suggestion I have with the data he presented is that the demographics in the US changed such that there's going to be more background cases of cardiac arrest. It seems to occur more often in blacks and in soccer than say whites and baseball, and I'd wager that the percentage of blacks and soccer has grown since the 1960s to the 2020s. That said, there could be excess cardiac events because of the virus or the vaccine, but it's uncertain with how the data was presented in that letter. -
It's starting to look that way, for sure, as the spike in SADS deaths continues.WestlinnDuck said:
The chicom crud or the mRNA vaxxes? Seems pretty clear that the vaxxes are a much higher risk to young people than the Wuhan flu.TurdBomber said:
Been following this stuff closely since 2020. Recent studies are showing Covid-related Myocarditis is much rarer than previously thought and presented in the media.LawDawg1 said:As stated in another post.... how does the argument ignore the fact COVID19 has shown to also increase heart inflammation and myocarditis? Unless you can establish that an athlete (1) had the Vaxx and (2) never had COVID19, these studies or data points are meaningless. Was it the vaxx? Was it prior exposure to COVID? Was it something else? I hate the pro and anti-vaxxers.... but these arguments lack logic.
Not conclusive, but trending away from Covid19 as a major cause of Myocarditis in young people.
The issue for me at this point, and many doctors who care, is to stop the arguing over the cause, and transition to accepting that it's a real and big problem and start screening and treating for myocarditis in young people under 40 who got vaccinated.
Fuck people! Even the WHO acknowledges the Vax is causing Myocarditis. Major, major flip-flop on the issue, proving they can't deny it any more.
What more do you need? -
Wait, you look at these numbers and come to the conclusion that it wasn't a "death sentence" but just the flu? Q for sure.TurdBomber said:
About 2 years ago, as I recall, I posted the spreadsheets showing King County cases and deaths. When I realized only 3 people in my Zip Code had died of Covid during a 9 month period, and 2 were in their 80s, I began to question the panic, the masks, the fear, and the absurdity of the county's Covid response.Bob_C said:From your King County overlords. Regardless if this is vaccine related or not, pushing it on young people was fucking stupid. In theory, unlimited risk with no reward.
It didn't make sense then, and it doesn't make sense now.
Was a 1% death rate - if you caught the Vid (.03 overall) ever worth what our government put us through? And how effective was our collective response? -
For almost 2 years every normal death was a Covid death. Colds and the flu can trigger what?46XiJCAB said:I’ve never understood why vax believers become so defensive when confronted with the fact that many of the things their overlords told them about COVID and what needed to be done in the name of science turned out to be BS.
Denial?
Embarrassment?
Stupidity?
Herd mentality?I
Pride?
Virtue?
Blissful ignorance?
All of the above.
Hail Lord Fauci! How many people got angry with you for questioning the severity of the virus, the effectiveness or need for the vaccine or the crushing blow the lockdowns forced uopn the economy? How many of these same people believe the BS coming out of Brandon's mouth today about reducing the deficit after raising it to levels causing record inflation? Now, if death is questioned, all death is back to normal and has nothing to do with vaccines. These people have to believe because government is their god and salvation. -
I'm cutting slack and giving the benefit of the doubt to anyone who got vaxxed. Many had no choice, or were pushed into it by wives, parents, kids, other parents, etc. Weighing the risks and benefits wasn't easy with so much tension in the air, and all the misinformation/disinformation bullshit flying around. It was truly hard to navigate through it all and reach a confident, best case scenario for many thoughtful reasonable people, so I'm not angry or resentful or all that critical toward anyone who said, "fuck it" and got the jab.RoadTrip said:
For almost 2 years every normal death was a Covid death. Colds and the flu can trigger what?46XiJCAB said:I’ve never understood why vax believers become so defensive when confronted with the fact that many of the things their overlords told them about COVID and what needed to be done in the name of science turned out to be BS.
Denial?
Embarrassment?
Stupidity?
Herd mentality?I
Pride?
Virtue?
Blissful ignorance?
All of the above.
Hail Lord Fauci! How many people got angry with you for questioning the severity of the virus, the effectiveness or need for the vaccine or the crushing blow the lockdowns forced uopn the economy? How many of these same people believe the BS coming out of Brandon's mouth today about reducing the deficit after raising it to levels causing record inflation? Now, if death is questioned, all death is back to normal and has nothing to do with vaccines. These people have to believe because government is their god and salvation.
Unless you were a fucking prick about it, like many on these boreds were, throughout. You mother fuckers can go fuck your morally superior selves and kiss my ass when you're done. You voluntarily and shamelessly engaged in a massive fraud upon your fellow citizens and would, I believe, be the first to hold the railcar doors open and load your fellow citizens onto the trains.
Fuck you now, fuck you later, and fuck you forever, Nazis. -
This argument I’ve never understood…if the excuse is that Covid also causes it, then giving people a vaccine that a) floods their body with high levels of the spike protein that is the likely source of the medical issues and b) doesn’t prevent Covid, so that when you do get Covid your body which is already dosed with spike protein from the vaccine suddenly gets a bunch more. I’m sure if they ever lined up vaccine data with Covid tests they’d find a huge overlap (Davies from Canada/Bayern Munich is the best example but most of that data is secretive and not available to the public).LawDawg1 said:As stated in another post.... how does the argument ignore the fact COVID19 has shown to also increase heart inflammation and myocarditis? Unless you can establish that an athlete (1) had the Vaxx and (2) never had COVID19, these studies or data points are meaningless. Was it the vaxx? Was it prior exposure to COVID? Was it something else? I hate the pro and anti-vaxxers.... but these arguments lack logic.
Also why it’s especially FS to take the vaccine if you’ve already had Covid. -
@hhusky said getting super immunity was the way to go.HoustonHusky said:
This argument I’ve never understood…if the excuse is that Covid also causes it, then giving people a vaccine that a) floods their body with high levels of the spike protein that is the likely source of the medical issues and b) doesn’t prevent Covid, so that when you do get Covid your body which is already dosed with spike protein from the vaccine suddenly gets a bunch more. I’m sure if they ever lined up vaccine data with Covid tests they’d find a huge overlap (Davies from Canada/Bayern Munich is the best example but most of that data is secretive and not available to the public).LawDawg1 said:As stated in another post.... how does the argument ignore the fact COVID19 has shown to also increase heart inflammation and myocarditis? Unless you can establish that an athlete (1) had the Vaxx and (2) never had COVID19, these studies or data points are meaningless. Was it the vaxx? Was it prior exposure to COVID? Was it something else? I hate the pro and anti-vaxxers.... but these arguments lack logic.
Also why it’s especially FS to take the vaccine if you’ve already had Covid.
-
Confirmation Bias. Or Not.
Fuck off.
Get well—LIVE—Demar!
May surprise many I am a man of faith. A flawed fucker, no doubt. But praying for Brother Demar and his family. Get well, young man -
Here was an interesting discussion between 2 doctors on the subject of Comotio Cordis and how the hockey player who suffered something similar was mis-diagnosed.
-
Saw this earlier. Also reports of Hamlin coding a second time en route to the ER or at the ER. Hard to find mention of it anywhere in the MSM. Probably because it would demolish the Comotio Cardis theory and put it back in the lap of vaccine caused Myocarditis.RoadTrip said:Here was an interesting discussion between 2 doctors on the subject of Comotio Cordis and how the hockey player who suffered something similar was mis-diagnosed.
Unless they find another cause, such as Martian particle lasers.
Literally anything BUT the vaccines. -
Here we go. How many hours before Iver's License is threatened to be pulled?
-
I truly feel bad for the young man but how can anyone swallow the msm/govt/NFL agenda right now? We've been aggregiously lied to for 2 years on the subject and the masses ask for another shit in their mouth??? I don't buy the narrative and am the crazy one? The cause of death could very well be a brain aneurysm or an undetected congenital heart issue but to ask the question if the fraudulent vaccine had anything to do with it, after it was tyranically forced upon the players, is somehow wrong??? What fucking world am I living in today?TurdBomber said:
Saw this earlier. Also reports of Hamlin coding a second time en route to the ER or at the ER. Hard to find mention of it anywhere in the MSM. Probably because it would demolish the Comotio Cardis theory and put it back in the lap of vaccine caused Myocarditis.RoadTrip said:Here was an interesting discussion between 2 doctors on the subject of Comotio Cordis and how the hockey player who suffered something similar was mis-diagnosed.
Unless they find another cause, such as Martian particle lasers.
Literally anything BUT the vaccines. -
He is not an epidemiologist or a bio-statistician so clearly disinformation.TurdBomber said:Here we go. How many hours before Iver's License is threatened to be pulled?
-
He took an extremely hard, hit to the chest and immediately went into cardiac arrest
But I like where you guys are going with he had a shot from two years ago, so that was what did it. -
Extremely hard?HuskyJW said:He took an extremely hard, hit to the chest and immediately went into cardiac arrest
But I like where you guys are going with he had a shot from two years ago, so that was what did it.
Immediately?
-
YellowSnow said:
A gal from our? Women’s row boat team in the late 90s who I knew, dropped dead of a heart attack Mt biking around Tahoe about 10 Years ago. No warming. Just gone.
I miss those simpler times. Freak shit just happened and that was that.
Wasn’t it within three seconds? Might have been less than thatpawz said:
Extremely hard?HuskyJW said:He took an extremely hard, hit to the chest and immediately went into cardiac arrest
But I like where you guys are going with he had a shot from two years ago, so that was what did it.
Immediately?
Regardless….. it was from the shot he had two years ago
Don’t be so jaded and negative I’m agreeing with you guys -
whatshouldicareabout said:
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.pawz said:
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?whatshouldicareabout said:
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".EsophagealFeces said:
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.Dude61 said:
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
I'm not trying to be a dick because you don't spent much, if any, time in the Tug, but it sure would have been nice had the level of 'integrity' you require been applied on the front-side of the pandemic response and subsequently the jab.whatshouldicareabout said:
Essentially, this is a database review which is a common form of surveillance to try to identify correlation between exposure and outcome. It doesn't appear to be more than identifying a statistic that an event happened (cardiac arrest) in an athlete (source population) given the vaccine (exposure). There would need to be control for confounding variables (race, age, gender, what sport they played, how long they played, etc.) to isolate how strong the outcome is correlated to the exposure. If the paper were more about reviewing the cases and determining whether a case was legitimately cardiac arrest or some other major cardiac event, then the cardiologist would be a much better fit.Bob_C said:
In theory, wouldn't a cardiologist be a better source of understanding and identifying side effects that effect the heart than an epidemiologist?whatshouldicareabout said:
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.pawz said:
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?whatshouldicareabout said:
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".EsophagealFeces said:
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.Dude61 said:
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
To me, one suggestion I have with the data he presented is that the demographics in the US changed such that there's going to be more background cases of cardiac arrest. It seems to occur more often in blacks and in soccer than say whites and baseball, and I'd wager that the percentage of blacks and soccer has grown since the 1960s to the 2020s. That said, there could be excess cardiac events because of the virus or the vaccine, but it's uncertain with how the data was presented in that letter.
If you know on the front-side that Pharma is a bad-actor, why was it a good idea to allow them Laissez-faire whence problem solving?
Since you are keen on epidemiology and biostatistics, are you familiar with The Great Barrington Declaration and the doctors behind it? They opined we did EVERYTHING wrong.
If unfamiliar, allow me:
https://gbdeclaration.org/
3 principal signatories
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya - professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.
Dr. Sunetra Gupta - professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.
Dr. Martin Kulldorff - professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations. -
HuskyJW said:
He took an extremely hard, hit to the chest and immediately went into cardiac arrest
But I like where you guys are going with he had a shot from two years ago, so that was what did it.
Post fact JWTurdBomber said:Here we go. How many hours before Iver's License is threatened to be pulled?
Speaking of people completely invested in covid and all the malarkey -
Umm, I think you missed the part where a guy with “doctor” in his Twitter handle and no discernible credentials made a tweet about it.HuskyJW said:He took an extremely hard, hit to the chest and immediately went into cardiac arrest
But I like where you guys are going with he had a shot from two years ago, so that was what did it.
Confirmation bias: Located!
