https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1610257536162332672?s=20&t=UG37urzIX71gOKIAeLfihw Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions. Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1610257536162332672?s=20&t=UG37urzIX71gOKIAeLfihw Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1610257536162332672?s=20&t=UG37urzIX71gOKIAeLfihw
As stated in another post.... how does the argument ignore the fact COVID19 has shown to also increase heart inflammation and myocarditis? Unless you can establish that an athlete (1) had the Vaxx and (2) never had COVID19, these studies or data points are meaningless. Was it the vaxx? Was it prior exposure to COVID? Was it something else? I hate the pro and anti-vaxxers.... but these arguments lack logic. It's as if the only variable introduced into the scientific experiment of the past several years are the mRNA vaccines themselves. An infectious disease that most have had by now could not possible play a role.
As stated in another post.... how does the argument ignore the fact COVID19 has shown to also increase heart inflammation and myocarditis? Unless you can establish that an athlete (1) had the Vaxx and (2) never had COVID19, these studies or data points are meaningless. Was it the vaxx? Was it prior exposure to COVID? Was it something else? I hate the pro and anti-vaxxers.... but these arguments lack logic.
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1610257536162332672?s=20&t=UG37urzIX71gOKIAeLfihw Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions. Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race? Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?No need to answer. The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all. In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough, is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record). I really hope this helps.
Text we received had to be wrong. Hopefully the young man recovers soon. If he does, medical heros and technology will have saved his life. A person with a >than room temperature iq would take this opportunity of being publicly humiliated to reflect internally and take a serious look at the unreliable sources of info they are being fed.I’m going to bet you’ll just dive deeper down the 8chan rabbit hole though. I have no idea what 8chan is. The text we received was from a young man at the university of Georgia. His father is an exec at ESPN. You need me to think I'm humiliated because you'll never be my equal and that bothers you. Ahhh, a low IQ with a dash of narcissism. That's always a special combination. This is a little ironic coming from mr. group chat
Text we received had to be wrong. Hopefully the young man recovers soon. If he does, medical heros and technology will have saved his life. A person with a >than room temperature iq would take this opportunity of being publicly humiliated to reflect internally and take a serious look at the unreliable sources of info they are being fed.I’m going to bet you’ll just dive deeper down the 8chan rabbit hole though. I have no idea what 8chan is. The text we received was from a young man at the university of Georgia. His father is an exec at ESPN. You need me to think I'm humiliated because you'll never be my equal and that bothers you. Ahhh, a low IQ with a dash of narcissism. That's always a special combination.
Text we received had to be wrong. Hopefully the young man recovers soon. If he does, medical heros and technology will have saved his life. A person with a >than room temperature iq would take this opportunity of being publicly humiliated to reflect internally and take a serious look at the unreliable sources of info they are being fed.I’m going to bet you’ll just dive deeper down the 8chan rabbit hole though. I have no idea what 8chan is. The text we received was from a young man at the university of Georgia. His father is an exec at ESPN. You need me to think I'm humiliated because you'll never be my equal and that bothers you.
Text we received had to be wrong. Hopefully the young man recovers soon. If he does, medical heros and technology will have saved his life. A person with a >than room temperature iq would take this opportunity of being publicly humiliated to reflect internally and take a serious look at the unreliable sources of info they are being fed.I’m going to bet you’ll just dive deeper down the 8chan rabbit hole though.
Text we received had to be wrong. Hopefully the young man recovers soon. If he does, medical heros and technology will have saved his life.
Text we received had to be wrong. Hopefully the young man recovers soon. If he does, medical heros and technology will have saved his life. A person with a >than room temperature iq would take this opportunity of being publicly humiliated to reflect internally and take a serious look at the unreliable sources of info they are being fed.I’m going to bet you’ll just dive deeper down the 8chan rabbit hole though. I have no idea what 8chan is. The text we received was from a young man at the university of Georgia. His father is an exec at ESPN. You need me to think I'm humiliated because you'll never be my equal and that bothers you. Ahhh, a low IQ with a dash of narcissism. That's always a special combination. This is a little ironic coming from mr. group chat You need me to think I'm humiliated because you'll never be my equal and that bothers you.
How is it so fucking hard to understand that the omicron variant was different than the original virusThe intentional obtuseness is tiresomeYet entirely expected
How is it so fucking hard to understand that the omicron variant was different than the original virusThe intentional obtuseness is tiresomeYet entirely expected What the fuck are you talking about?
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1610257536162332672?s=20&t=UG37urzIX71gOKIAeLfihw Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions. Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race? Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?No need to answer. The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all. In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record). I really hope this helps.
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1610257536162332672?s=20&t=UG37urzIX71gOKIAeLfihw Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions. Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race? Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?No need to answer. The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all. In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough, is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record). I really hope this helps. Like looking into election fraud, some people don't want to ask and don't want to know. Statistical anomalies can be just that. They can also direct an intellectually curious person into further investigation. When the first party strongly resists that investigation, that is further evidence that there should be an investigation - a real investigation.
