Americans FURIOUS As Democrats AND GOP Pledge 45 Billion To Zelensky & Ukraine

TurdBomber said:

show previous quotes

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

“If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

“I articulated it”

Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

"My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.

Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.

It was "Americans" like the dazzler that volunteered the US for world's policeman. European NATO along with the Scandis economies dwarf the Russians and yet they expect us to pay the freight. Phuck em. If Russia is an existential threat to Europe, then they can pay the freight. We are paying more than most of the Euros put together and they still whine about the US making money on selling arms to the Euros. And the Euros sneered when Trump told not to be dependent on Russian oil and gas and that they needed to pay their fair share of NATO. So did the US deep state. Along comes the dementia patient and then gives Nord Stream II the go ahead. The Germans were an existential threat before World War II and the Soviet Union was also after World War II. But like Jim Crow, that was decades ago and yet the dems and the US military grifters keep playing the same tune.

TurdBomber said:

show previous quotes

WestlinnDuck said:

TurdBomber said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

“If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

“I articulated it”

Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

"My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.

Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.

It was "Americans" like the dazzler that volunteered the US for world's policeman. European NATO along with the Scandis economies dwarf the Russians and yet they expect us to pay the freight. Phuck em. If Russia is an existential threat to Europe, then they can pay the freight. We are paying more than most of the Euros put together and they still whine about the US making money on selling arms to the Euros. And the Euros sneered when Trump told not to be dependent on Russian oil and gas and that they needed to pay their fair share of NATO. So did the US deep state. Along comes the dementia patient and then gives Nord Stream II the go ahead. The Germans were an existential threat before World War II and the Soviet Union was also after World War II. But like Jim Crow, that was decades ago and yet the dems and the US military grifters keep playing the same tune.

Dazzler would be right at home in many European countries that never get their hands dirty while refusing to pay their obligations to NATO.

But he uses the correct pronouns and has a Ukrainian flag, so it's all good and he really cares about democracy and honest elections in the Ukraine and a secure Ukrainian border.

Careful Race. You're giving away H's secrets from his favorite book, The Art of Chickenhawking.

HHusky said:

show previous quotes

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

“If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

“I articulated it”

Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

"My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.

Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.

hardhat said:

show previous quotes

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

“If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

“I articulated it”

Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

"My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.

Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.

The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.