Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Americans FURIOUS As Democrats AND GOP Pledge 45 Billion To Zelensky & Ukraine

1235789

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,508
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:


    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.

    It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
    I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.

    Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
    I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
    Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
    You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
    You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
    I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today.
    "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States"
    'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
    So China is the bigger threat. So what?

    Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
    Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
    China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:


    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.

    It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
    I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.

    Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
    I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
    Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
    You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
    You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
    I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today.
    "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States"
    'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
    So China is the bigger threat. So what?

    Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
    Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
    China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
    Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,508
    edited December 2022
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:


    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.

    It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
    I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.

    Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
    I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
    Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
    You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
    You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
    I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today.
    "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States"
    'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
    So China is the bigger threat. So what?

    Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
    Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
    China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
    Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
    Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.

    See how easy that was?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    Why would you have wanted it to start?

    a) fucking stupid

    b) dumb fucking shill

    c) criminal war profiteer

    d) brb jo for death and destruction

    I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.

    Great cost-benefit analysis as always.

    It’s important to note for the historical record who “created” the opportunity. It’s important for the critical thinker in determining how the pieces on the global chess board will play out.

    Ever wonder why the rest of the BRICS haven’t run to support our side? Of course you haven’t.

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,508
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    Why would you have wanted it to start?

    a) fucking stupid

    b) dumb fucking shill

    c) criminal war profiteer

    d) brb jo for death and destruction

    I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.

    Great cost-benefit analysis as always.

    It’s important to note for the historical record who “created” the opportunity. It’s important for the critical thinker in determining how the pieces on the global chess board will play out.

    Ever wonder why the rest of the BRICS haven’t run to support our side? Of course you haven’t.

    It’s okay if you don’t want to be the leader of the free world, of course. If you would like to relinquish leadership, you clearly voted for the right candidate in 2020.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:


    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.

    It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
    I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.

    Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
    I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
    Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
    You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
    You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
    I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today.
    "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States"
    'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
    So China is the bigger threat. So what?

    Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
    Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
    China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
    Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
    Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.

    See how easy that was?
    Preventing China from invading Taiwan is what I'd like to do. So of course I'd whine about it? You're really quite the genius when it comes to geopolitcs. First, Ukraine was a 'fledgling democracy'. Now it's all about bludgeoning Russia. And of course if someone says they're worried about China, they're stupid and an isolationist, and China invading Taiwan is exactly the same as what happened in Ukraine. Right. Flat out embarrassing stupidity from you. Are you a Reagan admirer?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,508
    edited December 2022
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:


    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.

    It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
    I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.

    Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
    I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
    Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
    You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
    You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
    I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today.
    "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States"
    'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
    So China is the bigger threat. So what?

    Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
    Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
    China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
    Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
    Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.

    See how easy that was?
    Preventing China from invading Taiwan is what I'd like to do. So of course I'd whine about it? You're really quite the genius when it comes to geopolitcs. First, Ukraine was a 'fledgling democracy'. Now it's all about bludgeoning Russia. And of course if someone says they're worried about China, they're stupid and an isolationist, and China invading Taiwan is exactly the same as what happened in Ukraine. Right. Flat out embarrassing stupidity from you. Are you a Reagan admirer?
    I am.

    He’d be ashamed of you.

    As for supporting fledgling democracies and inflicting damage on an autocratic aggressor, there’s no conflict between the two notions. Feel free to explain why supporting Taiwan against China is soooo different. Or do you just plan to shriek that nobody ever asks your opinion again?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,749 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    Why would you have wanted it to start?

    a) fucking stupid

    b) dumb fucking shill

    c) criminal war profiteer

    d) brb jo for death and destruction

    I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.

    Great cost-benefit analysis as always.

    It’s important to note for the historical record who “created” the opportunity. It’s important for the critical thinker in determining how the pieces on the global chess board will play out.

    Ever wonder why the rest of the BRICS haven’t run to support our side? Of course you haven’t.

    It’s okay if you don’t want to be the leader of the free world, of course. If you would like to relinquish leadership, you clearly voted for the right candidate in 2020.
    You voted for the straw man they installed. You're IQ is showing.