Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
Take it easy on the strawman.
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?
We're supporting the actual Nazi's to fight them and a huge chunk of the money is laundered back to those you fucking vote for. It all needs to end now! This is just another commie scam by your guys to protect their bio labs and money laundering ops. Keep up the disinformation comrade!
We're supporting the actual Nazi's to fight them and a huge chunk of the money is laundered back to those you fucking vote for. It all needs to end now! This is just another commie scam by your guys to protect their bio labs and money laundering ops. Keep up the disinformation comrade!
And the contrails! Don’t forget about the contrails!
Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
Take it easy on the strawman.
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?
Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
Take it easy on the strawman.
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?
I took your word for it. Obviously.
Did you actually graduate from RHS?
Have we bludgeoned Russia yet? How's that going?
Seriously?
Hey man, don't deflect. Has Russia been bludgeoned or not? Your words. It's going so well that we need billions and billions more. Foreign fighters are still dying.
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
Yes, how much land have they taken? Like 30 more miles past the old border? This is exactly the same thing as Hitler. 😄
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
Comments
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
"I think China is the biggest threat to the United States"
'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?