Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Americans FURIOUS As Democrats AND GOP Pledge 45 Billion To Zelensky & Ukraine

«13

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    I’m furious.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,436 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    I’m furious a quivering bearded cunt lip.

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,600 Standard Supporter
    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,029

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    When the bucket is approaching the size of the Indian Ocean, sure.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,600 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    We're 32 trillion in debt. How the hell do we have a lot of money?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,600 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    Yes, more wars!
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    Why would you have wanted it to start?

    a) fucking stupid

    b) dumb fucking shill

    c) criminal war profiteer

    d) brb jo for death and destruction

    I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    Why would you have wanted it to start?

    a) fucking stupid

    b) dumb fucking shill

    c) criminal war profiteer

    d) brb jo for death and destruction

    I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.
    How's the 'bludgeoning' going, fat retard? You mean you don't care about the fledgling democracy anymore?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
    China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
    China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
    I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    edited December 2022
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
    China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
    I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
    Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

    I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited December 2022
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
    China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
    I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
    Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

    I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
    You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?

    Also, some of you gold guys are really fixated on Russia and Reagan. It must be fun for you to relive your glory days.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
    China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
    I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
    Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

    I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
    You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?
    I took your word for it. Obviously.

    Did you actually graduate from RHS?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
    China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
    I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
    Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

    I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
    You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?
    I took your word for it. Obviously.

    Did you actually graduate from RHS?
    Have we bludgeoned Russia yet? How's that going?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,701 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2022
    We're supporting the actual Nazi's to fight them and a huge chunk of the money is laundered back to those you fucking vote for. It all needs to end now! This is just another commie scam by your guys to protect their bio labs and money laundering ops. Keep up the disinformation comrade!
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    Anyone that disagrees with me is obviously a racist, fascist, Reagan admiring, right wing moron.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    Sledog said:

    We're supporting the actual Nazi's to fight them and a huge chunk of the money is laundered back to those you fucking vote for. It all needs to end now! This is just another commie scam by your guys to protect their bio labs and money laundering ops. Keep up the disinformation comrade!

    And the contrails! Don’t forget about the contrails!
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
    China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
    I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
    Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

    I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
    You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?
    I took your word for it. Obviously.

    Did you actually graduate from RHS?
    Have we bludgeoned Russia yet? How's that going?
    Seriously?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

    Take it easy on the strawman.

    We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
    It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
    Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
    My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.
    China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.
    I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?
    Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

    I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
    You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?
    I took your word for it. Obviously.

    Did you actually graduate from RHS?
    Have we bludgeoned Russia yet? How's that going?
    Seriously?
    Hey man, don't deflect. Has Russia been bludgeoned or not? Your words. It's going so well that we need billions and billions more. Foreign fighters are still dying.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.

    It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    Hhusky, deep thinker.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,895
    edited December 2022
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.

    It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
    I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.

    Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.