Americans FURIOUS As Democrats AND GOP Pledge 45 Billion To Zelensky & Ukraine


Comments
-
I’m furious.
-
HHusky said:
I’m
furiousa quivering bearded cunt lip. -
Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
-
When the bucket is approaching the size of the Indian Ocean, sure.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
-
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
The nazi defends the NazisHHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
“Fiscal conservative” nazi.RaceBannon said:
The nazi defends the NazisHHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
-
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
We're 32 trillion in debt. How the hell do we have a lot of money?HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
Why would you have wanted it to start?HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
a) fucking stupid
b) dumb fucking shill
c) criminal war profiteer
d) brb jo for death and destruction
-
Yes, more wars!HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.pawz said:
Why would you have wanted it to start?HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
a) fucking stupid
b) dumb fucking shill
c) criminal war profiteer
d) brb jo for death and destruction -
How's the 'bludgeoning' going, fat retard? You mean you don't care about the fledgling democracy anymore?HHusky said:
I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.pawz said:
Why would you have wanted it to start?HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
a) fucking stupid
b) dumb fucking shill
c) criminal war profiteer
d) brb jo for death and destruction -
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.hardhat said:
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?HHusky said:
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.hardhat said:
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you. -
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.hardhat said:
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?HHusky said:
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.hardhat said:
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree. -
You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?HHusky said:
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.hardhat said:
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?HHusky said:
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.hardhat said:
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
Also, some of you gold guys are really fixated on Russia and Reagan. It must be fun for you to relive your glory days. -
I took your word for it. Obviously.hardhat said:
You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?HHusky said:
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.hardhat said:
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?HHusky said:
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.hardhat said:
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
Did you actually graduate from RHS? -
Have we bludgeoned Russia yet? How's that going?HHusky said:
I took your word for it. Obviously.hardhat said:
You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?HHusky said:
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.hardhat said:
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?HHusky said:
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.hardhat said:
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
Did you actually graduate from RHS? -
We're supporting the actual Nazi's to fight them and a huge chunk of the money is laundered back to those you fucking vote for. It all needs to end now! This is just another commie scam by your guys to protect their bio labs and money laundering ops. Keep up the disinformation comrade!
-
Anyone that disagrees with me is obviously a racist, fascist, Reagan admiring, right wing moron.
-
And the contrails! Don’t forget about the contrails!Sledog said:We're supporting the actual Nazi's to fight them and a huge chunk of the money is laundered back to those you fucking vote for. It all needs to end now! This is just another commie scam by your guys to protect their bio labs and money laundering ops. Keep up the disinformation comrade!
-
Seriously?hardhat said:
Have we bludgeoned Russia yet? How's that going?HHusky said:
I took your word for it. Obviously.hardhat said:
You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?HHusky said:
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.hardhat said:
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?HHusky said:
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.hardhat said:
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
Did you actually graduate from RHS? -
Hey man, don't deflect. Has Russia been bludgeoned or not? Your words. It's going so well that we need billions and billions more. Foreign fighters are still dying.HHusky said:
Seriously?hardhat said:
Have we bludgeoned Russia yet? How's that going?HHusky said:
I took your word for it. Obviously.hardhat said:
You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?HHusky said:
Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.hardhat said:
I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?HHusky said:
China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.hardhat said:
My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.HHusky said:
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?hardhat said:
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.HHusky said:
Take it easy on the strawman.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
Did you actually graduate from RHS? -
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
-
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.HHusky said:It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
-
Hhusky, deep thinker.
-
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.hardhat said:
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.HHusky said:It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.