Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

CONFESSION IN KARI LAKE TRIAL? CASE CLOSED? TRIAL UPDATE!

135678

Comments

  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,101 Standard Supporter

    The 3 Stooges above proving this point…



    I hate to agree with those jackasses ever, but i have yet to see evidence that there was enough provable fraud to overturn the election. That's the beauty of mail in voting for the dems, they can commit fraud and its impossible to prove... no phone movements don't count. You need to get rid of mail in voting period, but where you have it, do the same damn thing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,021
    edited December 2022
    The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

    We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    HoustonHusky said:

    The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

    We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

    Any of you gals ever going to actually read the decision you’re in such a tizzy about?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    HoustonHusky said:

    The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

    We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

    I have bad news for you: people wouldn’t have cared about this trial regardless of when it was held.

    Imagine blowing such an open and shut case though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

    We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

    Any of you gals ever going to actually read the decision you’re in such a tizzy about?
    MelloDawg said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

    We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

    I have bad news for you: people wouldn’t have cared about this trial regardless of when it was held.

    Imagine blowing such an open and shut case though.
    You two ladies should consider rocket-surgery for a living.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,757 Standard Supporter
    Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    Sledog said:

    Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

    Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,757 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

    Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.
    You never heard any of the testimony go listen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

    Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.
    You never heard any of the testimony go listen.
    What a pussy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

    Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.
    You never heard any of the testimony go listen.
    What a pussy.
    Irony lost on the Merit Scholar QB. Shocking.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter