CONFESSION IN KARI LAKE TRIAL? CASE CLOSED? TRIAL UPDATE!
Comments
-
“There is no doubt that each side believes firmly in its position with great conviction,” Thompson ruled on Tuesday. “The fact that Plaintiff failed to meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence required… does not equate to a finding that her claims were, or were not, groundless and presented in bad faith.
Can you read @HHusky?
What a fucking retard. -
What were the numbers? How nany didn't vote?HoustonHusky said:
Yes…way more than enough. The estimate is that the hour+ lines in the targeted Republican areas suppressed voting 10-17% while magically the ballot errors didn’t even happen in the more Democratic areas of the County. Several “safe” Representative districts (AZ1 esp) almost flipped because the Election Day vote was suppressed so much.Goduckies said:
Were there enough votes to change the outcome? If so what were the totals?HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on… -
More retardation. Jesus.Goduckies said:
What were the numbers? How nany didn't vote?HoustonHusky said:
Yes…way more than enough. The estimate is that the hour+ lines in the targeted Republican areas suppressed voting 10-17% while magically the ballot errors didn’t even happen in the more Democratic areas of the County. Several “safe” Representative districts (AZ1 esp) almost flipped because the Election Day vote was suppressed so much.Goduckies said:
Were there enough votes to change the outcome? If so what were the totals?HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…
If the process is corrupted, the vote count is invalid, period.
Grow a brain, Duck. -
This rebuts anything I ever said how exactly? (And that's not to say that the court of appeals will agree, if asked.) Use your words.TurdBomber said:“There is no doubt that each side believes firmly in its position with great conviction,” Thompson ruled on Tuesday. “The fact that Plaintiff failed to meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence required… does not equate to a finding that her claims were, or were not, groundless and presented in bad faith.
Can you read @HHusky?
What a fucking retard. -
Madam, the court laid out the burden of proof very clearly and explained how it had not been met. If you want to quarrel with the decision, you'd actually have to read it.TurdBomber said:
More retardation. Jesus.Goduckies said:
What were the numbers? How nany didn't vote?HoustonHusky said:
Yes…way more than enough. The estimate is that the hour+ lines in the targeted Republican areas suppressed voting 10-17% while magically the ballot errors didn’t even happen in the more Democratic areas of the County. Several “safe” Representative districts (AZ1 esp) almost flipped because the Election Day vote was suppressed so much.Goduckies said:
Were there enough votes to change the outcome? If so what were the totals?HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…
If the process is corrupted, the vote count is invalid, period.
Grow a brain, Duck.
It's about ten pages. With effort you might be able to plow through it in a couple weeks. -
Fuck Off, Gnat. I would expect a competent attorney to understand the burden of proof required and what the actual issues before the court are.HHusky said:
This rebuts anything I ever said how exactly? (And that's not to say that the court of appeals will agree, if asked.) Use your words.TurdBomber said:“There is no doubt that each side believes firmly in its position with great conviction,” Thompson ruled on Tuesday. “The fact that Plaintiff failed to meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence required… does not equate to a finding that her claims were, or were not, groundless and presented in bad faith.
Can you read @HHusky?
What a fucking retard.
But then there's you. -
Election deniers now define "winning" as not being sanctioned after trial?TurdBomber said:
Fuck Off, Gnat. I would expect a competent attorney to understand the burden of proof required and what the actual issues before the court are.HHusky said:
This rebuts anything I ever said how exactly? (And that's not to say that the court of appeals will agree, if asked.) Use your words.TurdBomber said:“There is no doubt that each side believes firmly in its position with great conviction,” Thompson ruled on Tuesday. “The fact that Plaintiff failed to meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence required… does not equate to a finding that her claims were, or were not, groundless and presented in bad faith.
Can you read @HHusky?
What a fucking retard.
But then there's you.
congrats, I guess
#moralvictory -
The proof was the altered ballot printing and machine malfunctions only in repub heavy precincts. Easy fucking peasy.
-
Bumfuck, ID in the house!Sledog said:The proof was the altered ballot printing and machine malfunctions only in repub heavy precincts. Easy fucking peasy.
-
Where do you think Judge Thompson's BOP language I posted came from? The bathroom stall where you service the Glory Hole?HHusky said:
Madam, the court laid out the burden of proof very clearly and explained how it had not been met. If you want to quarrel with the decision, you'd actually have to read it.TurdBomber said:
More retardation. Jesus.Goduckies said:
What were the numbers? How nany didn't vote?HoustonHusky said:
Yes…way more than enough. The estimate is that the hour+ lines in the targeted Republican areas suppressed voting 10-17% while magically the ballot errors didn’t even happen in the more Democratic areas of the County. Several “safe” Representative districts (AZ1 esp) almost flipped because the Election Day vote was suppressed so much.Goduckies said:
Were there enough votes to change the outcome? If so what were the totals?HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…
If the process is corrupted, the vote count is invalid, period.
Grow a brain, Duck.
It's about ten pages. With effort you might be able to plow through it in a couple weeks.
Such Retard, H.
