CONFESSION IN KARI LAKE TRIAL? CASE CLOSED? TRIAL UPDATE!
Comments
-
Probably not.Sledog said:https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/28/the-kari-lake-decision-is-a-travesty-heres-one-reason-why/
Hell of a read with transcripts for accuracy.
Shitty lawyer will poopoo it like he does everything except TRUMPS GUILTY! But no evidence or trial or testimony or even a crime charged!
I do think this should continue to be a story though for many many reasons. -
If you could think any smaller and narrower you'd be representing fleas in a matchbox courtroom.HHusky said:
His opinion on the likelihood of the outcome changing cannot overcome the fact that his estimate included a range that both would and would not have changed the outcome. Clear and convincing, not more likely than not is the standard. So Kari didn’t even present a prima facie case. Don’t quit your day job.HoustonHusky said:
His testimony. Keep lying you speed limit IQ fraud.HHusky said:
You very nearly stumble over the point here.HoustonHusky said:
The court testimony was up to 40,000 from the lines alone, which is way more than enough to flip the elections. And that ignores all the other shenanigans…Goduckies said:
What were the numbers? How nany didn't vote?HoustonHusky said:
Yes…way more than enough. The estimate is that the hour+ lines in the targeted Republican areas suppressed voting 10-17% while magically the ballot errors didn’t even happen in the more Democratic areas of the County. Several “safe” Representative districts (AZ1 esp) almost flipped because the Election Day vote was suppressed so much.Goduckies said:
Were there enough votes to change the outcome? If so what were the totals?HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…
Yes, Kari's witness said his estimated range could be enough to change the result. But his estimate also included a range that would not have done so. So, you could accept his testimony at face value and it still wouldn't carry the day.
Inadequate proof as a matter of law. Proving you may have won doesn't feed the bulldog in an election challenge.
“In my professional opinion, the amount of Election Day voters that we’re talking about here, with the margin, would have changed the outcome of the race, and the number is substantial enough to have changed who the overall winner was in this race,” Baris said.
At what point will you ever stop defending corruption, hoaxes and shady elections, @HHusky?
Is this what being a lifelong nark who runs and complains to the teacher every time you strike out in kickball leads to in adulthood?
It's a shame we can't go back and Sarah Conner your pathetic ass on the playground.
#YourFatherHatesYou -
Wow. Look who finally stated the standard correctly. Only took 3 days, Dazzler. Nice work.HHusky said:
Yet his estimate is recited in the Court’s opinion. The one you girls refuse to read. The range he arrived at allows for either outcome. His beliefs about which outcome is more likely is, bluntly, irrelevant. An election is presumed proper and correctly determined until clearly and convincingly proven otherwise.HoustonHusky said:HHusky: Kari's witness said his estimated range could be enough to change the result.
Kari’s witness: “In my professional opinion, the amount of Election Day voters that we’re talking about here, with the margin, would have changed the outcome of the race, and the number is substantial enough to have changed who the overall winner was in this race,”
HHusky: yeah but…
Keep lying speed-limit IQ boy… -
So you don't want to know what was said by whom. I see. I thought nits like you were scared of the dark?MelloDawg said:
Probably not.Sledog said:https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/28/the-kari-lake-decision-is-a-travesty-heres-one-reason-why/
Hell of a read with transcripts for accuracy.
Shitty lawyer will poopoo it like he does everything except TRUMPS GUILTY! But no evidence or trial or testimony or even a crime charged!
I do think this should continue to be a story though for many many reasons. -
No, I’d love to know. That’s why I want this to continue to be a story and a talking point for the GOP as a whole. The truth must be unfurled.Sledog said:
So you don't want to know what was said by whom. I see. I thought nits like you were scared of the dark?MelloDawg said:
Probably not.Sledog said:https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/28/the-kari-lake-decision-is-a-travesty-heres-one-reason-why/
Hell of a read with transcripts for accuracy.
Shitty lawyer will poopoo it like he does everything except TRUMPS GUILTY! But no evidence or trial or testimony or even a crime charged!
I do think this should continue to be a story though for many many reasons. -
You really are the ectoplasmic residue of these boreds.MelloDawg said:
No, I’d love to know. That’s why I want this to continue to be a story and a talking point for the GOP as a whole. The truth must be unfurled.Sledog said:
So you don't want to know what was said by whom. I see. I thought nits like you were scared of the dark?MelloDawg said:
Probably not.Sledog said:https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/28/the-kari-lake-decision-is-a-travesty-heres-one-reason-why/
Hell of a read with transcripts for accuracy.
Shitty lawyer will poopoo it like he does everything except TRUMPS GUILTY! But no evidence or trial or testimony or even a crime charged!
I do think this should continue to be a story though for many many reasons. -
The best part of Mello was the stain on the sheet.TurdBomber said:
You really are the ectoplasmic residue of these boreds.MelloDawg said:
No, I’d love to know. That’s why I want this to continue to be a story and a talking point for the GOP as a whole. The truth must be unfurled.Sledog said:
So you don't want to know what was said by whom. I see. I thought nits like you were scared of the dark?MelloDawg said:
Probably not.Sledog said:https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/28/the-kari-lake-decision-is-a-travesty-heres-one-reason-why/
Hell of a read with transcripts for accuracy.
Shitty lawyer will poopoo it like he does everything except TRUMPS GUILTY! But no evidence or trial or testimony or even a crime charged!
I do think this should continue to be a story though for many many reasons.
