CONFESSION IN KARI LAKE TRIAL? CASE CLOSED? TRIAL UPDATE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clbYp_HBOVcComments
-
-
Good lord, that lawyer is a complete idiot.DerekJohnson said: -
Is it HHusky?Southerndawg said:
Good lord, that lawyer is a complete idiot.DerekJohnson said:
-
He is kind of dumpy looking. Chances are high.USMChawk said: -
And goes from wanna be alpha to run away shrivel dick in 3 seconds flatSwaye said:
He is kind of dumpy looking. Chances are high.USMChawk said: -
She straight castrated that turd.
-
-
Profile in courage by the Dazzler.
Hides for days and then shows up minutes after ruling
Fuck off, coward -
The fix was in. Plenty of evidence. Loads. The nation is done. Dazzler and his faggy cohorts cheer. Need an emergency appeal.
-
Not really, there were issues sure, enough to overturn an election? Nope. Unless you think The GOP recorder was in on it.Sledog said:The fix was in. Plenty of evidence. Loads. The nation is done. Dazzler and his faggy cohorts cheer. Need an emergency appeal.
-
-
Ok.Sledog said:The fix was in. Plenty of evidence. Loads. The nation is done. Dazzler and his faggy cohorts cheer. Need an emergency appeal.
-
We live in a #BananaRepublic… nobody should have had any illusions that they would treat this issue fairly.
The court cut the trial down to a single issue that still blew up spectacularly in their face so they timed it for Christmas Eve to throw it out and hide it in the news cycle. You’d have to be a complete moron to believe the intentional ballot reprogramming the day of the election to mis-size ballots only in heavily Republican districts was anything but blatant cheating.
The system is blowing up before our very eyes…it’s a long slow process but it’s happening faster than I thought it would. -
Weird, sounds like it should have been an open and shut case for the plaintiff. The judge was probably legislating from the bench or, you know, something else, I don’t know, I lose track of the rhetoric.HoustonHusky said:We live in a #BananaRepublic… nobody should have had any illusions that they would treat this issue fairly.
The court cut the trial down to a single issue that still blew up spectacularly in their face so they timed it for Christmas Eve to throw it out and hide it in the news cycle. You’d have to be a complete moron to believe the intentional ballot reprogramming the day of the election to mis-size ballots only in heavily Republican districts was anything but blatant cheating.
The system is blowing up before our very eyes…it’s a long slow process but it’s happening faster than I thought it would. -
Which part of the opinion (which you didn’t read) did you dispute?HoustonHusky said:We live in a #BananaRepublic… nobody should have had any illusions that they would treat this issue fairly.
The court cut the trial down to a single issue that still blew up spectacularly in their face so they timed it for Christmas Eve to throw it out and hide it in the news cycle. You’d have to be a complete moron to believe the intentional ballot reprogramming the day of the election to mis-size ballots only in heavily Republican districts was anything but blatant cheating.
The system is blowing up before our very eyes…it’s a long slow process but it’s happening faster than I thought it would. -
So the judge is in on the fix too?HoustonHusky said:We live in a #BananaRepublic… nobody should have had any illusions that they would treat this issue fairly.
The court cut the trial down to a single issue that still blew up spectacularly in their face so they timed it for Christmas Eve to throw it out and hide it in the news cycle. You’d have to be a complete moron to believe the intentional ballot reprogramming the day of the election to mis-size ballots only in heavily Republican districts was anything but blatant cheating.
The system is blowing up before our very eyes…it’s a long slow process but it’s happening faster than I thought it would. -
The 3 Stooges above proving this point…HoustonHusky said:You’d have to be a complete moron to believe the intentional ballot reprogramming the day of the election to mis-size ballots only in heavily Republican districts was anything but blatant cheating.
-
You get to assume facts at the Tug.HoustonHusky said:
The 3 Stooges above proving this point…HoustonHusky said:You’d have to be a complete moron to believe the intentional ballot reprogramming the day of the election to mis-size ballots only in heavily Republican districts was anything but blatant cheating.
In court you’re required to prove them. -
They're good at cheating. Just like the SEC.
-
What would you know about court, Dazzler?HHusky said:
You get to assume facts at the Tug.HoustonHusky said:
The 3 Stooges above proving this point…HoustonHusky said:You’d have to be a complete moron to believe the intentional ballot reprogramming the day of the election to mis-size ballots only in heavily Republican districts was anything but blatant cheating.
In court you’re required to prove them. -
The 3 Stooges above proving this point…
I hate to agree with those jackasses ever, but i have yet to see evidence that there was enough provable fraud to overturn the election. That's the beauty of mail in voting for the dems, they can commit fraud and its impossible to prove... no phone movements don't count. You need to get rid of mail in voting period, but where you have it, do the same damn thing. -
The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on… -
Any of you gals ever going to actually read the decision you’re in such a tizzy about?HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on… -
I have bad news for you: people wouldn’t have cared about this trial regardless of when it was held.HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…
Imagine blowing such an open and shut case though. -
HHusky said:
Any of you gals ever going to actually read the decision you’re in such a tizzy about?HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…
You two ladies should consider rocket-surgery for a living.MelloDawg said:
I have bad news for you: people wouldn’t have cared about this trial regardless of when it was held.HoustonHusky said:The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.
We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…
Imagine blowing such an open and shut case though.
-
Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.
-
Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.Sledog said:Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.
-
What a pussy.Sledog said: -
Irony lost on the Merit Scholar QB. Shocking.HHusky said:
