Kari Lake delivers on her promise to sue Arizona election officials
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIyXWP7rpEIComments
-
Emergency hearing at 11
-
I love the fight in this woman
-
Fool me once and I wasn't fooled anyway
Nothing comes of this. Once it's done it's done. Same thing in 2020
Maybe do something about 2024
Or don't -
Nothing will come of this in regards to reversing the fraud for '22.RaceBannon said:Fool me once and I wasn't fooled anyway
Nothing comes of this. Once it's done it's done. Same thing in 2020
Maybe do something about 2024
Or don't
But her standing and fighting will pay dividends somewhere down the line. They want her to accept the fraud and just go away. She's saying fuck no. You should admire that. You always say the GOP doesn't fight. Well here's one that refuses to go down for the count. -
I've been told that GOP who fight cost Mitch McConnell Majority Leader and stopped the red waveDerekJohnson said:
Nothing will come of this in regards to reversing the fraud for '22.RaceBannon said:Fool me once and I wasn't fooled anyway
Nothing comes of this. Once it's done it's done. Same thing in 2020
Maybe do something about 2024
Or don't
But her standing and fighting will pay dividends somewhere down the line. They want her to accept the fraud and just go away. She's saying fuck no. You should admire that. You always say the GOP doesn't fight. Well here's one that refuses to go down for the count.
Voters don't care about fraud and crooked elections -
https://newsmax.com/newsfront/moderate-republicans-majority/2022/12/13/id/1100273/
Now that Trump and the Magatards are out of the way the GOP can get back to bidness
A slim GOP majority in the House will open the door for moderate Republican lawmakers to try reach across the aisle in an attempt to push through legislative priorities they consider achievable, The Hill is reporting.
But the news outlet cautioned they face a tough environment from the House GOP's right flank.
The more moderate GOP House members point to the midterms and say some of the losses can be pinned on candidates from the right flank of the Republican party, while some centrists pulled off victories.
"We're the group that's the majority-makers," said Rep. Dave Joyce, R-Ohio, who heads the more moderate Republican Governance Group. "We don't come from districts where we're going to get reelected no matter what. We come from districts that honor our commitment to trying to get things done, and they respect the fact that we go back to our districts and tell them the truth — certain things are achievable, but certain things aren't achievable.
"We're not interested in making noise or interested in making a point. We're interested in getting things done."
Rep. Pete Stauber, R-Minn., who co-chairs the Main Street Caucus, added: "Working together is what the American people want to do. And we don't have to leave our founding principles, those conservative principles, to get legislation across the floor. We can work with our legislators on both sides of the aisle to deliver for the American people."
We know who are centrists don't we?
And we know what reaching across the aisle means don't we?
Meet the new GOP same as the old GOP
-
Any politician says that we need to get something done is not a conservative/classic liberal. It's group speech for selling out your principles. Getting something done is amnesty with no securing of the border. Vaxx mandates are getting something done but is just fascist virtue signaling.RaceBannon said:https://newsmax.com/newsfront/moderate-republicans-majority/2022/12/13/id/1100273/
Now that Trump and the Magatards are out of the way the GOP can get back to bidness
A slim GOP majority in the House will open the door for moderate Republican lawmakers to try reach across the aisle in an attempt to push through legislative priorities they consider achievable, The Hill is reporting.
But the news outlet cautioned they face a tough environment from the House GOP's right flank.
The more moderate GOP House members point to the midterms and say some of the losses can be pinned on candidates from the right flank of the Republican party, while some centrists pulled off victories.
"We're the group that's the majority-makers," said Rep. Dave Joyce, R-Ohio, who heads the more moderate Republican Governance Group. "We don't come from districts where we're going to get reelected no matter what. We come from districts that honor our commitment to trying to get things done, and they respect the fact that we go back to our districts and tell them the truth — certain things are achievable, but certain things aren't achievable.
"We're not interested in making noise or interested in making a point. We're interested in getting things done."
Rep. Pete Stauber, R-Minn., who co-chairs the Main Street Caucus, added: "Working together is what the American people want to do. And we don't have to leave our founding principles, those conservative principles, to get legislation across the floor. We can work with our legislators on both sides of the aisle to deliver for the American people."
We know who are centrists don't we?
And we know what reaching across the aisle means don't we?
Meet the new GOP same as the old GOP -
I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day. -
Given the heavy dnc lean in modern polling, this means she was actually up 8-10%Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
-
One of her points are thousands of invalid signature votes that were pulled and later reinserted into the valid ballots and counted.
-
-
Maricopa election officials on Monday afternoon: All systems are go and the scanners, printers and network have all been tested.
Tuesday morning, election day: Hey, everything is phucked up and a bunch of printers and scanners are down. Need to go to the backup plan of throwing ballots into unmarked boxes with no chain of custody. Nothing to see here, carry on. -
Any news?
-
Was reading this was poorly written and there was no evidence and was going to get tossed.
https://www.azmirror.com/2022/12/13/legal-experts-kari-lake-lawsuit-to-overturn-the-election-is-poorly-written-lacking-details-and-evidence/
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2022/12/12/kari-lake-lawsuit-long-election-conspiracy-little-proof/69719119007/
After today's hearing, 2 day hearing set for next week to review evidence... -
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know… -
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick? -
@MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Still can't shake the TDS. Sad. Just sad. -
Odd, I don’t recall declaring a side in any of this. I also didn’t do any of those things, so there can’t be any bragging. Either way, you sound fairly activated by this.Bendintheriver said:
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick? -
Your feigned neutrality schtick is worn out, you supposed intellectual weenie.MelloDawg said:
Odd, I don’t recall declaring a side in any of this. I also didn’t do any of those things, so there can’t be any bragging. Either way, you sound fairly activated by this.Bendintheriver said:
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick? -
You clearly have zero integrity and you lie. You aren't worth the time.MelloDawg said:
Odd, I don’t recall declaring a side in any of this. I also didn’t do any of those things, so there can’t be any bragging. Either way, you sound fairly activated by this.Bendintheriver said:
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick? -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKd3L8QFLBQ
- "poorly written" from a legal perspective
- Lake doesn't provide any evidence or make any factual claims in the suit.
- All of the suits like this have been thrown out of court so far
But she's giving it "the 'ol college try" ...
Discuss.
-
animate said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKd3L8QFLBQ
- "poorly written" from a legal perspective
- Lake doesn't provide any evidence or make any factual claims in the suit.
- All of the suits like this have been thrown out of court so far
But she's giving it "the 'ol college try" ...
Discuss.
Consider the source.
-
The court hearing is Tuesday
-
One of these election denier cases is going to win big in court one day, somewhere. And the initial filing for that winning case will have been laughed at by some leftist quoting Democratic legal experts.RaceBannon said:The court hearing is Tuesday
So far this is moving better than expected by the experts. Not holding my breath that this is the one, it's not a laughing matter. -
-
Neutral suggests I don’t take sidesTurdBomber said:
Your feigned neutrality schtick is worn out, you supposed intellectual weenie.MelloDawg said:
Odd, I don’t recall declaring a side in any of this. I also didn’t do any of those things, so there can’t be any bragging. Either way, you sound fairly activated by this.Bendintheriver said:
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick?
What does “win big” mean? If it’s reversing the election, I’ve got some bad news for you.Bob_C said:
One of these election denier cases is going to win big in court one day, somewhere. And the initial filing for that winning case will have been laughed at by some leftist quoting Democratic legal experts.RaceBannon said:The court hearing is Tuesday
So far this is moving better than expected by the experts. Not holding my breath that this is the one, it's not a laughing matter. -
MelloDawg said:
Neutral suggests I don’t take sidesTurdBomber said:
Your feigned neutrality schtick is worn out, you supposed intellectual weenie.MelloDawg said:
Odd, I don’t recall declaring a side in any of this. I also didn’t do any of those things, so there can’t be any bragging. Either way, you sound fairly activated by this.Bendintheriver said:
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick?
What does “win big” mean? If it’s reversing the election, I’ve got some bad news for you.Bob_C said:
One of these election denier cases is going to win big in court one day, somewhere. And the initial filing for that winning case will have been laughed at by some leftist quoting Democratic legal experts.RaceBannon said:The court hearing is Tuesday
So far this is moving better than expected by the experts. Not holding my breath that this is the one, it's not a laughing matter.
Leftist that parrots legal experts heard from. -
MelloDawg said:
Neutral suggests I don’t take sidesTurdBomber said:
Your feigned neutrality schtick is worn out, you supposed intellectual weenie.MelloDawg said:
Odd, I don’t recall declaring a side in any of this. I also didn’t do any of those things, so there can’t be any bragging. Either way, you sound fairly activated by this.Bendintheriver said:
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick?
What does “win big” mean? If it’s reversing the election, I’ve got some bad news for you.Bob_C said:
One of these election denier cases is going to win big in court one day, somewhere. And the initial filing for that winning case will have been laughed at by some leftist quoting Democratic legal experts.RaceBannon said:The court hearing is Tuesday
So far this is moving better than expected by the experts. Not holding my breath that this is the one, it's not a laughing matter.
This is the lamest joke on this site. Your dedication to it has me worried that you're serious. -
Actions speak louder than words.MelloDawg said:
Neutral suggests I don’t take sidesTurdBomber said:
Your feigned neutrality schtick is worn out, you supposed intellectual weenie.MelloDawg said:
Odd, I don’t recall declaring a side in any of this. I also didn’t do any of those things, so there can’t be any bragging. Either way, you sound fairly activated by this.Bendintheriver said:
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick?
HTH
-
hardhat said:MelloDawg said:
Neutral suggests I don’t take sidesTurdBomber said:
Your feigned neutrality schtick is worn out, you supposed intellectual weenie.MelloDawg said:
Odd, I don’t recall declaring a side in any of this. I also didn’t do any of those things, so there can’t be any bragging. Either way, you sound fairly activated by this.Bendintheriver said:
How stupid can one be. Your side lied to a FISA court judge. You wire tapped a Presidential campaign. Paid for a fake dossier and then tried to impeach a sitting President which was taking away the basic right to vote of 70 million Americans.MelloDawg said:
Aw geez, I have some bad news for you then.Bendintheriver said:I know for fact that rats cheat. There is no question about that. As I have recounted on here a couple of times, I have seen the cheating with my own two eyes. If trying to take away a basic right of 70,000,000 in this country (the right to vote) wasn't enough proof that rats cheat, nothing will convince you.
However, I need to see more details. I want to know exactly what she is suing over. Does she have proof? She was only ahead by about 3% in polling prior to the polls opening. It is a big swing but still attainable and we have certainly seen Rep candidates win it with far more gap in polling.
I am all for calling out the fraud, and I believe there is a massive amount of fraud by rats (Doesn't every voter go to the ballot drop at 3 am and dump dozens of ballots at one time?) , but I just haven't seen or read much of a smoking gun in this case. Maybe I am wrong and if so I hope she sues the shit out of those that like to take away voters rights. If I am right, she needs to go about her business and run for office again.
The odds are that first timers will not be successful in running for office until their 3rd attempt, and those odds are only for the winners. If one is truly committed to representing their constituents, they should take their licks and come back energized for another day.
Spoiler: She’ll have as much proof as, well, you know…
Here you are bragging about getting away with it. You cheat. We know it.
Can you be a bigger piece of shit anti-American prick?
What does “win big” mean? If it’s reversing the election, I’ve got some bad news for you.Bob_C said:
One of these election denier cases is going to win big in court one day, somewhere. And the initial filing for that winning case will have been laughed at by some leftist quoting Democratic legal experts.RaceBannon said:The court hearing is Tuesday
So far this is moving better than expected by the experts. Not holding my breath that this is the one, it's not a laughing matter.
This is the lamest joke on this site. Your dedication to it has me worried that you'reseriousbrain dead.
