Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

To Those Who Think The Huskies Will Start 4-0

1356

Comments

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH

    Disagree:

    Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year.
    But those always come at home, and the only good/top team they have at home is oregon and boise st. I gave him BSU and I'm not giving him Oregon

    Disagree

    2010 at USC

    2011 at Utah (Since Utah won more games that year than Sark ever has in a season it counts)
    If your gonna count Utah (who went 7-6 that year BTW) you have a point, IMO Utah was not a quality team and their backup QB was playing that game
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH

    Disagree:

    Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year.
    But those always come at home, and the only good/top team they have at home is oregon and boise st. I gave him BSU and I'm not giving him Oregon

    Disagree

    2010 at USC

    2011 at Utah (Since Utah won more games that year than Sark ever has in a season it counts)
    If your gonna count Utah (who went 7-6 that year BTW) you have a point, IMO Utah was not a quality team and their backup QB was playing that game
    8-5 actually. But yeah, they weren't that great. But it's still better than anything UW has done with Sark. Also, if many fans think Utah wasn't a quality team, what the fuck does that say about Washington?
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.

    Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.

    Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.

    Can't you just be happy with 4-0? 4-1? 4-2?

    The doogs like to ignore an easy front loaded schedule and are giddy over the record. Pointing out the schedule was easy on doogman is likely to get a timeout. Then, when the schedule if much more difficult up front, as was the case in 2012, the are all of a sudden all about the schedule.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.

    Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.

    Can't you just be happy with 4-0? 4-1? 4-2?

    The doogs like to ignore an easy front loaded schedule and are giddy over the record. Pointing out the schedule was easy on doogman is likely to get a timeout. Then, when the schedule if much more difficult up front, as was the case in 2012, the are all of a sudden all about the schedule.
    I am for the players but against the schedule.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

    BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

    @ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

    Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

    Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.
  • Houhusky said:

    UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

    BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

    @ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

    Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

    Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.

    UW will start either 2-2 or 1-3, cook it. I have all the screenshots I need.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Houhusky said:

    UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

    BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

    @ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

    Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

    Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.

    UW will start either 2-2 or 1-3, cook it. I have all the screenshots I need.
    You don't have all the screenshots you need yet. You need this one too:



    UW will start 0-4 on its way to another well-earned 0-12.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited August 2013
    UW will start 4-0 and will be rolling along quite nicely, then the trip to stanford in which all of Stanford's blue chip offensive lineman will dominant our shitty "diamonds in the ruff" d line, we lose 35-10 thus starting the yearly midseason losing streak, where we get plunger raped at stan, get our brains beaten in vs oregon, and shit the bed in tempe. And we're well on our way to a 7-6 season, except in this one we'll have a losing record in conference