Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I'd like to offer a retraction
GreenRiverGatorz
Member Posts: 10,165
I stated last week that the Pac-12's tie breaker rules are needlessly complex and twist themselves into knots trying to pick the "better" team to go to the CCG. Obviously the higher CFP ranking should be used as a tie breaker in the case of a 3-way tie where not all teams have played each other.
Given last night's lunacy from the lemon party committee, thank god that wasn't the criteria (though something tells me they wouldn't have had Utah leapfrog us if it was, which just makes their picks all the more invalidated). Don't twist though, the Pac-12 is still fucking retarded and should reinstate divisions since, you know, the fucking schedule is built on those same divisions that apparently no longer exist.
Also big thanks to USC and UCLA for blowing up this aborted fetus of a conference. It's well past its expiration date and clownfuckery like this is all the more reason for everyone to LEAVE.
Given last night's lunacy from the lemon party committee, thank god that wasn't the criteria (though something tells me they wouldn't have had Utah leapfrog us if it was, which just makes their picks all the more invalidated). Don't twist though, the Pac-12 is still fucking retarded and should reinstate divisions since, you know, the fucking schedule is built on those same divisions that apparently no longer exist.
Also big thanks to USC and UCLA for blowing up this aborted fetus of a conference. It's well past its expiration date and clownfuckery like this is all the more reason for everyone to LEAVE.
Comments
-
How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
-
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent. -
USC should have waited for the Pac to negotiateGreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
There is a strong possibility Amazon is going to pay the conference a bunch of cash to stream the games -
Dollars might not be the only thing driving there move to the B1G. Could be they want to be surrounded by better football/sporting culturePostGameOrangeSlices said:
USC should have waited for the Pac to negotiateGreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
There is a strong possibility Amazon is going to pay the conference a bunch of cash to stream the games -
Maybe even a superior culture.whatshouldicareabout said:
Dollars might not be the only thing driving there move to the B1G. Could be they want to be surrounded by better football/sporting culturePostGameOrangeSlices said:
USC should have waited for the Pac to negotiateGreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
There is a strong possibility Amazon is going to pay the conference a bunch of cash to stream the games -
Maybe, but then Amazon will pay multiples more to the next conference that has its TV rights up for negotiation.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
USC should have waited for the Pac to negotiateGreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
There is a strong possibility Amazon is going to pay the conference a bunch of cash to stream the games
Just like an NFL QB hitting the FA market, we were one of the top paid conferences right after the 2012 deal. Until we weren't. At the end of the day the Pac-12 has far less eyeballs than the other four conferences, and that's going to cost us money in the long run.
It's dead. Join a conference that still matters. -
PurpleBaze said:
Maybe even a superior culture.whatshouldicareabout said:
Dollars might not be the only thing driving there move to the B1G. Could be they want to be surrounded by better football/sporting culturePostGameOrangeSlices said:
USC should have waited for the Pac to negotiateGreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
There is a strong possibility Amazon is going to pay the conference a bunch of cash to stream the games
Ethnocentrism: The Cultural Superiority Complex
Ethnocentrism is a belief in the superiority of your own culture. It results from judging other cultures by your own cultural ideals. Ethnocentrism is linked to cultural blind spots. Blind spots occur when we fail to attribute differences between our behaviours and beliefs and those of others to differences in cultural schemas.
There is great variation among the cultural schemas of different social groups, but when we do not appreciate the diversity of cultural schemas, we are limited to interpreting the world narrowly through our own cultural filter—our natural cultural code defines our reality and determines what is true and right for us. Any variations are deemed bizarre, wrong, or inferior.
Learning to appreciate our differences
The opposite of ethnocentrism is cultural relativism: the judging of cultural elements relative to their cultural context.
Culture is flexible and has helped human beings adapt and survive in nearly every socioecological environment on the planet. Recognising the adaptive nature of culture supports cultural relativism. Every culture has succeeded as a system for human survival. No culture can be judged as evolutionary superior to another and cultural features can only be understood in terms of their role in the complete system.
Cultural relativism encourages respect for different cultural values, beliefs, and practices. We are less likely to interpret differences as bizarre, offensive, or deficient if we consider them in terms of their own cultural context.
TL;dr - shaking and about to vomit (and other assorted malarkey).
Even @GrandpaSankey can see blind spots are a bad thing.
-
And yet here we are with poor, little old USC having way less TV money that the other 4 Power Conferences on the verge of cruising into the CFP with a nice cushy Pac schedule, plus ND. And they turned it around in one year, by buttfucking Oklahomo and stealing their corch.GreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
USC has an 8.2 billion dollar endowment (hi @creepycoug ). I know they can't pull from that to buy players, but it's a good measurement of the affluence that the USC alumni base has. Seems like they can still compete even with shitty Pac 12 TV deals. -
Exactly, so they should go independent and get the best of both worlds.YellowSnow said:
And yet here we are with poor, little old USC having way less TV money that the other 4 Power Conferences on the verge of cruising into the CFP with a nice cushy Pac schedule, plus ND. And they turned it around in one year, by buttfucking Oklahomo and stealing their corch.GreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
USC has an 8.2 billion dollar endowment (hi @creepycoug ). I know they can't pull from that to buy players, but it's a good measurement of the affluence that the USC alumni base has. Seems like they can still compete even with shitty Pac 12 TV deals. -
USC will be part of the "haves" regardless of short term decisions around conference and TV deals.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Exactly, so they should go independent and get the best of both worlds.YellowSnow said:
And yet here we are with poor, little old USC having way less TV money that the other 4 Power Conferences on the verge of cruising into the CFP with a nice cushy Pac schedule, plus ND. And they turned it around in one year, by buttfucking Oklahomo and stealing their corch.GreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
USC has an 8.2 billion dollar endowment (hi @creepycoug ). I know they can't pull from that to buy players, but it's a good measurement of the affluence that the USC alumni base has. Seems like they can still compete even with shitty Pac 12 TV deals.
#fighton -
You gonna be waterfront on Huntington Harbor @UW_Doog_Bot or what after you get the SC post grad degree? I mean it's not Newport Harbor, but still...UW_Doog_Bot said:
USC will be part of the "haves" regardless of short term decisions around conference and TV deals.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Exactly, so they should go independent and get the best of both worlds.YellowSnow said:
And yet here we are with poor, little old USC having way less TV money that the other 4 Power Conferences on the verge of cruising into the CFP with a nice cushy Pac schedule, plus ND. And they turned it around in one year, by buttfucking Oklahomo and stealing their corch.GreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
USC has an 8.2 billion dollar endowment (hi @creepycoug ). I know they can't pull from that to buy players, but it's a good measurement of the affluence that the USC alumni base has. Seems like they can still compete even with shitty Pac 12 TV deals.
#fighton
-
Just waiting on that housing bubble. Should tim up nicely.YellowSnow said:
You gonna be waterfront on Huntington Harbor @UW_Doog_Bot or what after you get the SC post grad degree? I mean it's not Newport Harbor, but still...UW_Doog_Bot said:
USC will be part of the "haves" regardless of short term decisions around conference and TV deals.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Exactly, so they should go independent and get the best of both worlds.YellowSnow said:
And yet here we are with poor, little old USC having way less TV money that the other 4 Power Conferences on the verge of cruising into the CFP with a nice cushy Pac schedule, plus ND. And they turned it around in one year, by buttfucking Oklahomo and stealing their corch.GreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
USC has an 8.2 billion dollar endowment (hi @creepycoug ). I know they can't pull from that to buy players, but it's a good measurement of the affluence that the USC alumni base has. Seems like they can still compete even with shitty Pac 12 TV deals.
#fighton -
I found a 4 Bed / 3 Bath for you for a kewl 4.8 million.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Just waiting on that housing bubble. Should tim up nicely.YellowSnow said:
You gonna be waterfront on Huntington Harbor @UW_Doog_Bot or what after you get the SC post grad degree? I mean it's not Newport Harbor, but still...UW_Doog_Bot said:
USC will be part of the "haves" regardless of short term decisions around conference and TV deals.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Exactly, so they should go independent and get the best of both worlds.YellowSnow said:
And yet here we are with poor, little old USC having way less TV money that the other 4 Power Conferences on the verge of cruising into the CFP with a nice cushy Pac schedule, plus ND. And they turned it around in one year, by buttfucking Oklahomo and stealing their corch.GreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
USC has an 8.2 billion dollar endowment (hi @creepycoug ). I know they can't pull from that to buy players, but it's a good measurement of the affluence that the USC alumni base has. Seems like they can still compete even with shitty Pac 12 TV deals.
#fighton -
Probably the one my buddy is selling. He's cashing out and headed to Idaho. Blah blah blah take it to the tug.YellowSnow said:
I found a 4 Bed / 3 Bath for you for a kewl 4.8 million.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Just waiting on that housing bubble. Should tim up nicely.YellowSnow said:
You gonna be waterfront on Huntington Harbor @UW_Doog_Bot or what after you get the SC post grad degree? I mean it's not Newport Harbor, but still...UW_Doog_Bot said:
USC will be part of the "haves" regardless of short term decisions around conference and TV deals.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Exactly, so they should go independent and get the best of both worlds.YellowSnow said:
And yet here we are with poor, little old USC having way less TV money that the other 4 Power Conferences on the verge of cruising into the CFP with a nice cushy Pac schedule, plus ND. And they turned it around in one year, by buttfucking Oklahomo and stealing their corch.GreenRiverGatorz said:
What good is winning a conference that pulls in half of the TV revenue of the ACC and is on a long-term track to lose any auto-bids from the expanded playoffs?YellowSnow said:How FS is USC for leaving the PAC? What good is the extra money if the odds of winning you conference decrease significantly?
Honestly though, they should just go independent.
USC has an 8.2 billion dollar endowment (hi @creepycoug ). I know they can't pull from that to buy players, but it's a good measurement of the affluence that the USC alumni base has. Seems like they can still compete even with shitty Pac 12 TV deals.
#fighton
