#12: The Disrespect is Unreal
Comments
-
So us?EsophagealFeces said:chuck said:
I have no interest in UW playing Texas. There's really no upside.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
What about the meltdown if our doog legend 10-2 dream team gets blown the fuck out by Sark?haie said:This site would cream themselves harder than a Natty of we fall back to the Vegas/Alamo and shove it up Sark's pretend sober loose asshole.
While Coach K and the drop 8 defense softens the Penix
I'm laughing just thinking about it
It’s just about revenge against Sark, which NOGAFAT besides bitter fans.chuck said:
I have no interest in UW playing Texas. There's really no upside.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
What about the meltdown if our doog legend 10-2 dream team gets blown the fuck out by Sark?haie said:This site would cream themselves harder than a Natty of we fall back to the Vegas/Alamo and shove it up Sark's pretend sober loose asshole.
While Coach K and the drop 8 defense softens the Penix
I'm laughing just thinking about it -
I'm not upset about #12. I feel like we should be somewhere between 10-12, based on strength of schedule and what we've accomplished.
-
How many defensive starters were out against Arizona State? Isn’t that part of the formula
-
That is too reasonable for a HH posterDerekJohnson said:I'm not upset about #12. I feel like we should be somewhere between 10-12, based on strength of schedule and what we've accomplished.
-
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings. -
ASU is part of the body of work, doog.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings. -
I don’t think the committee trusts UW with “nice things”
-
Don’t do the loss counting thing … that’s low information fandomRaceBannon said:
Don't lose two games because three loss teams are better post of the dayTequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
-
So why ae you counting the ASU loss?Tequilla said:
Don’t do the loss counting thing … that’s low information fandomRaceBannon said:
Don't lose two games because three loss teams are better post of the dayTequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
Your take is the ultimate low info talking head point -
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
