#12: The Disrespect is Unreal
Comments
-
just trying to make the conference championship game look like it means something. The disrespect towards Penix is a true shame
-
Utah’s win over Oregon State was impressive. Wish we did that.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Of course Utah Lost to 6-6 Florida but that's not worth bringing up in the commentary. Yes, the same Florida that also lost to Vanderbilt
Not saying the ASU loss isn't bad but it is pretty lame to do what they did in the rankings based on a 7 point conference loss on the road. -
I'll give Utah credit for playing 6 road games. If we had the same record I would understand them being ranked ahead of us due to that.
But since the committee wants to overlook Utah losing when they played in the heat in Florida, they should consider our 1pm start in Tempe compared to Utah's 7pm start.
Whatever. Fight the fuck On. -
CFP Rankings are moar accurate than the AP and Coaches poles.
Honk ‘em. -
Blah blah blah. We? kind of deserve the skepticism and I’m okay with it considering there will be movement again and the stakes and outcomes are pretty well understood heading into this weekend. What would be really nice is if we show up at a Bowl game and shove our throbbing Penix down a throat or two. DGAF who/where/when at this point. Lay the pipe on a non-Pac 12 stage please and fucking thank you.
-
The votes of 13 people >>>>the votes of 127 people??BennyBeaver said:CFP Rankings are moar accurate than the AP and Coaches poles.
Honk ‘em.
WHY DO YOU SUPPORT VOTER SUPPRESSION YOU FUCKING FASCIST!?!?!?
-
Seriously fuck the Pac-12. We better get in the fucking Big 10.RaceBannon said:I mean Caleb Williams against Big Penix. USC v UW. The class of the coast with the two hottest quarterbacks in America. People east of Kent might have actually tuned in
But no some dumb fucking three loss mountain west squad is being forced on an unsuspecting public yet again
Fuck the Pac 12. IDGAF about the CFP committee. The Pac 12 thought they were being smart and as it turns out they are just dumbshits again
Sounds like I care because I would have liked to see the DAWGS and Trojans respect each other FRIDAY nigh
Retards
-
Yea it would suck having a coach losing to shitty teamsTequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
-
I don't think a 10-2 WASHINGTON gets left out of a NY6 no matter what.AtomicDawg said:
Any bowl other than an ny6 is a waste and some of those still have players sit out.
#NationalBrand -
So us?EsophagealFeces said:
It’s just about revenge against Sark, which NOGAFAT besides bitter fans. -
I'm not upset about #12. I feel like we should be somewhere between 10-12, based on strength of schedule and what we've accomplished.
-
How many defensive starters were out against Arizona State? Isn’t that part of the formula
-
That is too reasonable for a HH posterDerekJohnson said:I'm not upset about #12. I feel like we should be somewhere between 10-12, based on strength of schedule and what we've accomplished.
-
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings. -
ASU is part of the body of work, doog.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings. -
I don’t think the committee trusts UW with “nice things”
-
Don’t do the loss counting thing … that’s low information fandomRaceBannon said:
Don't lose two games because three loss teams are better post of the day
-
So why ae you counting the ASU loss?Tequilla said:
Your take is the ultimate low info talking head point -
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog -
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things change
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog -
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid point
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
-
Three losses should hurt their resume more than beating USC by 1 point should help it. Washington should be slightly higher ranked than Utah.
-
How did Utah do at Autzen?
That's what I thought
Every tie break the Pac 10 or 12 had before they went full retard this year has UW second. Every. Damn. One
10 games winners win over 9 game winners
We don't do hypotheticals
The only wadded panties are yours. It's a shitty take. As usual -
UW’s schedule this year was as soft as the Depends that you wear
I don’t think it really matters which is ranked ahead of the other right now because everything tied to UW is dependent on Friday
There are reasonable arguments for Utah to be ranked ahead of UW … this idea that it’s incomprehensible is idiotic
UW’s fan base has gone incredibly soft -
UW should be playing Friday you obtuse idiot
-
I think that Teq and Race need to drop the golves.
-
They are always dropped
-
Did I ever say they shouldn’t?RaceBannon said:UW should be playing Friday you obtuse idiot
I’ve said that the changing out of North/South this year was idiotic … anytime you have to go to a 5th tiebreaker you’re system sucks -
Within conference games, here are the differences in schedule:Tequilla said:UW’s schedule this year was as soft as the Depends that you wear
I don’t think it really matters which is ranked ahead of the other right now because everything tied to UW is dependent on Friday
There are reasonable arguments for Utah to be ranked ahead of UW … this idea that it’s incomprehensible is idiotic
UW’s fan base has gone incredibly soft
Utah played USC
UW played Cal
Each played 2 cupcakes non-con.
Utah played at Florida, which went 6-6. Utah lost.
UW played home vs Michigan State, which went 5-7. UW on. Maybe if UW had lost we'd be ranked higher cause MSU would be 6-6?
Florida plays 8 conference games while MSU played 9. Those teams aren't that far apart in sucking.
USC as a win and opponent makes for a tougher schedule for Yoote. Yoote 2-2 vs good teams, UW 2-1.
And somehow UW is worse that Utah because a road loss to a bad conference team is worse than a road loss to a mediocre non conference team.
Is the difference between Charmin Soft and a TUFF schedule truly the difference between swapping a 4-8 team for an 11-1 one?
There is a lot of hair splitting to support Utah. When it is that close, tiebreaker should go to the team that has lost less.
