Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

In fairness to DeBoer

LawDawg1
LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,942
Lake, Peterson, and Sark all lose that game last night.

Comments

  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Turned a corner

    Into a oncoming bus

    Lol
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,261 Standard Supporter
    thechatch said:

    I think Petersen gets it done last night for UW.

    I can can guarantee you Cristobal or Sark find a way to lose that game, albeit in much different fashions.

    Cristobal would abandon the passing game and mis-manage critical possessions by going turtle on first and throwing WR screens on 3rd and 11.

    Sark would end up with 150yds in penalties and 3 second half turnovers with a couple of 2nd and short trick plays turned into big TFLs.

    Either way it would have been special.

    The difference in clock management between the Stanford Verdell fumble game and Saturday vs UCLA is absolutely insane.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dtd said:

    thechatch said:

    I think Petersen gets it done last night for UW.

    I can can guarantee you Cristobal or Sark find a way to lose that game, albeit in much different fashions.

    Cristobal would abandon the passing game and mis-manage critical possessions by going turtle on first and throwing WR screens on 3rd and 11.

    Sark would end up with 150yds in penalties and 3 second half turnovers with a couple of 2nd and short trick plays turned into big TFLs.

    Either way it would have been special.

    The difference in clock management between the Stanford Verdell fumble game and Saturday vs UCLA is absolutely insane.
    It's really not that hard but it is a good indicator of your coach's IQ.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club

    Turned a corner

    Into a oncoming bus

    Strange how you stood by Lake yet throw Deboer under the bus.
    Even stranger is why this is such a big deal
  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,942
    PurpleBaze said:Race just sit your boney little cunt down. You still look foolish from the 'lambo didnt win shit' post you made an hour ago and Pup had to correct you on. As usual, and for the last 23+ years, Pup has fucked you up thoroughly enough. Youre done and henceforth Just shut it!!!!!!

    You're like that annoying little bitch CNN reporter when God Trump takes questions from the press. He quickly, like Pup, silences and has you removed expeditiously. Again Race, you're Acosta tactics dont work well. Not a good analogy, Jimmy hasnt came out closet yet

    LOL

  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,383
    Canadawg said:

    I was impressed they took Tuallapapa out. Petersen would have stubbornly kept the safe guy in all game

    Good point and Newton certainly rose to the occasion with his catch and breaking tackles for a TD.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,330

    Turned a corner

    Into a oncoming bus

    Strange how you stood by Lake yet throw Deboer under the bus.
    Even stranger is why this is such a big deal
    You’re held to a higher standard.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam

    UW out-gained Cal by 170 yards, held them to 6-15 on third down, got the bullshit pick penalty that I swear only gets called against our Dwags to take 7 off the board and then missed a FG. That sort of adversity would have tanked a Pete or Sark led team. The phantom holding penalty when the boys were salting the game away was also a back breaker for Husky teams of the recent past. This team over came the bad momentum and won a game on the road against a team that’s won six in a row at home. Big step for Boner IMHO.

    The penalties hurt and the most glaringly, obviously bad one took the clinching TD off the board. UW gets to coast most of the 4th quarter otherwise.
  • Kingdome_Urinals
    Kingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,793
    Could have easily been up 17-0 at half.

    There were three possible great games for UW, and they got stuck with the 25% chance of a shittily called game, and still won.

    I'll take it.

    But yeah, DBs getting sliced and diced by Jack "the snake" Plummer, would happen in every scenario.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,383

    Could have easily been up 17-0 at half.

    There were three possible great games for UW, and they got stuck with the 25% chance of a shittily called game, and still won.

    I'll take it.

    But yeah, DBs getting sliced and diced by Jack "the snake" Plummer, would happen in every scenario.

    Though if UW had been up by 3 scores or more by the late 3rd / early 4th, it would have made Cal more 1 dimensional and made the pass D a little easier while allowing the pass rushers to pin their ears back earlier.

    Regardless, the bye week comes at a good time for the D to fix some things. They can't fix everything because the personnel is what it is but they can do a better job of scheming to protect weaknesses. It also helps that, after the Beav game, UW has 8 days before going playing @ Oregon.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    HFNY said:

    Regardless, the bye week comes at a good time for the D to fix some things. They can't fix everything because the personnel is what it is but they can do a better job of scheming to protect weaknesses. It also helps that, after the Beav game, UW has 8 days before going playing @ Oregon.

    So you're saying the back seven will be tanned, rested, and ready?
  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,942

    What was encouraging about the game was the second half adjustments by the offense. What was not encouraging about the game were the second half adjustments made by the defense.

    Agreed. Despite Rod Gilmore’s terrible explanation, I don’t understand why that was our offensive game plan for the first half.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,330
    HFNY said:

    Could have easily been up 17-0 at half.

    There were three possible great games for UW, and they got stuck with the 25% chance of a shittily called game, and still won.

    I'll take it.

    But yeah, DBs getting sliced and diced by Jack "the snake" Plummer, would happen in every scenario.

    Though if UW had been up by 3 scores or more by the late 3rd / early 4th, it would have made Cal more 1 dimensional and made the pass D a little easier while allowing the pass rushers to pin their ears back earlier.

    Regardless, the bye week comes at a good time for the D to fix some things. They can't fix everything because the personnel is what it is but they can do a better job of scheming to protect weaknesses. It also helps that, after the Beav game, UW has 8 days before going playing @ Oregon.
    One dimensional teams that throw on us do whatever they want.

  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,942
    edited October 2022

    HFNY said:

    Could have easily been up 17-0 at half.

    There were three possible great games for UW, and they got stuck with the 25% chance of a shittily called game, and still won.

    I'll take it.

    But yeah, DBs getting sliced and diced by Jack "the snake" Plummer, would happen in every scenario.

    Though if UW had been up by 3 scores or more by the late 3rd / early 4th, it would have made Cal more 1 dimensional and made the pass D a little easier while allowing the pass rushers to pin their ears back earlier.

    Regardless, the bye week comes at a good time for the D to fix some things. They can't fix everything because the personnel is what it is but they can do a better job of scheming to protect weaknesses. It also helps that, after the Beav game, UW has 8 days before going playing @ Oregon.
    One dimensional teams that throw on us do whatever they want.

    It's better when they don't get too far behind and decide to throw it to catch up. Let them think they need to run to keep us "honest." The minute they go 2 minute offense through the air, we're? fucked.

    As much as I hate that douche Lanning with his stupid "eat," millennial slogans, hand gestures, and tard tennies, we? need to steal his playbook strategy and steal some possessions. If we can't stop anyone - just go for the onside kick. Every single time. It doesn't matter if they go 80 yards or 45 yards. Teams will score on this defense. Steal a possession. Do what your previously did - go for it on 4th down. Almost every single time. Same logic. This team won't stop anyone. Why give the ball to them on purpose?

  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,198

    UW out-gained Cal by 170 yards, held them to 6-15 on third down, got the bullshit pick penalty that I swear only gets called against our Dwags to take 7 off the board and then missed a FG. That sort of adversity would have tanked a Pete or Sark led team. The phantom holding penalty when the boys were salting the game away was also a back breaker for Husky teams of the recent past. This team over came the bad momentum and won a game on the road against a team that’s won six in a row at home. Big step for Boner IMHO.

    Sounds tailor-made for a Sark loss.
  • wobidbus
    wobidbus Member Posts: 308

    Could have easily been up 17-0 at half.

    There were three possible great games for UW, and they got stuck with the 25% chance of a shittily called game, and still won.

    I'll take it.

    But yeah, DBs getting sliced and diced by Jack "the snake" the snack Plummer, would happen in every scenario.

    FIFY