My thoughts on the secondary

Baseman said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Houhusky said:

People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete

It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.

UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.

Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.

Pressing

So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

Fucking Doogs are delusional

UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

Hth

I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.

It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.

It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case

Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts

UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

"All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all

Taylor Rapp is a selfish POS

Fuck that guy. Shane Pahokoa would beat his ass.

Baseman said:

MikeDamone said:

Baseman said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Houhusky said:

People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete

It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.

UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.

Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.

Pressing

So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

Fucking Doogs are delusional

UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

Hth

I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.

It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.

It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case

Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts

UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

"All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all

Taylor Rapp is a selfish POS

Fuck that guy. Shane Pahokoa would beat his ass.

Shane's not a big Rapp fan

Nope. Shane told me that to my FACE

Canadawg said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Houhusky said:

People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete

It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.

UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.

Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.

2 score win>1 score win

You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡

Did you watch the game 👩‍🦯

DerekJohnson said:

MikeDamone said:

chuck said:

RoadDawg55 said:

UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.

Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.

I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.

It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening.

I've said it many times. How a game is won or lost matters more than the final school. I've used the Sark Az bounce off the foot pick six win as an example. That game was a mess and showed huge problems. But the "can't you just be happy with a win" crowd went nuts. Good and bad trends will eventually emerge and produce consistent results.

I can remember a loss that gave me a huge amount of optimism as to what was coming. UW vs Colorado. You could see that UW team was about to explode big time.

While that is true, Washington had already thrashed Florida 34-7 in the previous year's Freedom Bowl and USC 31-0 in mid-Sept of 1990. So you could already see what was coming. But yes, playing the defending national champions to a 20-14 loss on the road was indicative.

Also of note, that 1990 Colorado game wasn't on TV. Hard to fathom these days.

My point about Colorado was that it was a scoreboard loss that gave me hope. That was truly an example of playing them close. Not going into the 4th quarter needed 3 TDs and 3 2 point conversions definition that we seem to have today.

I'm listened to it on the radio. A note about the 89 freedom bowl. Huskies were in ranked and we definitely underdogs to the Emmitt Smith lead gators 🐊. They after losing to all their ranked opponents that year they finished strong ranked 23 at 8-4. Don James sleeping in his office and drinking maxwell house was starting to pay off. Like I said, it's about trends.

CuntWaffle said:

MikeDamone said:

Canadawg said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

MikeDamone said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Houhusky said:

People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete

It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.

UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.

Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.

2 score win>1 score win

You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡

Did you watch the game 👩‍🦯

Wow I have a grandma who is blind from diabetes. Ever think about that asshole?

Need @GrandpaSankey to chime in here.