Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

My thoughts on the secondary

2

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,534 Swaye's Wigwam

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional.

    There was no point after UCLA went up by 3 scores that UW had a prayer. Two garbage time TDs. BFD
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,534 Swaye's Wigwam

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,534 Swaye's Wigwam

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,552 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited October 2022
    What should have been a close game was given to UCLA because of a mind numbingly bad play call and 2 picks into triple coverage. It's still close even with the defense playing poorly without those.

    The two members of the team getting fluffed the most over the past month gave the game away.

    Another pretty critical play was tuli getting a pick and letting fucking skinny ass DTR hit him and knock it to an incompletion. I think they get it at midfield if he just falls down immediately with the catch.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,534 Swaye's Wigwam

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
    Taylor Rapp is a selfish POS
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Baseman said:

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
    Taylor Rapp is a selfish POS
    Fuck that guy. Shane Pahokoa would beat his ass.
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365

    Baseman said:

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
    Taylor Rapp is a selfish POS
    Fuck that guy. Shane Pahokoa would beat his ass.
    Shane's not a big Rapp fan
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Baseman said:

    Baseman said:

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
    Taylor Rapp is a selfish POS
    Fuck that guy. Shane Pahokoa would beat his ass.
    Shane's not a big Rapp fan
    Nope. Shane told me that to my FACE
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,559 Founders Club

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    Noone in their right mind ever thought UW had more than a 2 percent chance at winning
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.

    Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,384 Swaye's Wigwam

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    2 score win>1 score win

    You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,149
    Canadawg said:

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    2 score win>1 score win

    You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡
    C'mon, man. Don't go confusing little mikey with facts.
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365

    Enough guys. Recruits/players family members read these boreds.

    As they should.
Sign In or Register to comment.