Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

My thoughts on the secondary

Swaye
Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
«1

Comments

  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    Fuck yourself, it was actually me who made this point first.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,305 Founders Club

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    We lost and played like shit. But yeah, I generally agree with your sentiments.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    All the starters are hurt.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I got yelled at by Doogs for mentioning this.
  • biak1
    biak1 Member Posts: 4,237
    UCLA just converted another 3rd down.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,682 Swaye's Wigwam
    biak1 said:

    UCLA just converted another 3rd down.

    Two UW dbs just declined the opportunity to tackle someone for minimal gain.
  • RTD
    RTD Member Posts: 837
    DeeTR, Chardonnay, and Bonobo killed us.

    RevereseRocketLaunch.gif
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,759 Founders Club

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    It was a blowout because UW needed one more stop everyone knew they weren't getting.

    Scoring 8 and then needing UCLA to punt once with 4-5 minutes left, there was a better chance to tie than MSU had at the end of that game.

    I think they had UCLA on a 3rd and long too.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,213

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,443 Founders Club
    biak1 said:

    UCLA just converted another 3rd down and 18.

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,213

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional.

    There was no point after UCLA went up by 3 scores that UW had a prayer. Two garbage time TDs. BFD
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,213

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,213

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,759 Founders Club
    edited October 2022
    What should have been a close game was given to UCLA because of a mind numbingly bad play call and 2 picks into triple coverage. It's still close even with the defense playing poorly without those.

    The two members of the team getting fluffed the most over the past month gave the game away.

    Another pretty critical play was tuli getting a pick and letting fucking skinny ass DTR hit him and knock it to an incompletion. I think they get it at midfield if he just falls down immediately with the catch.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,213

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
    Taylor Rapp is a selfish POS