Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Heat from the Edge

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,348 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,872 Founders Club
    @Auburndawg
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,728 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    The problem with being a stats junkie is you think our fatal flaw is our pass rush and not our secondary
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    It's been fucking maddening, and I still don't trust our defense.

    But still, our success this year is based on boat racing teams.
    It's constant flashbacks of Trace McSorely converting 3rd down after 3rd down against us. It started with Kent State and hasn't really stopped since.

    The good news is that this is presumably an easy fix. Morrell/Inge just need to repair whatever this schematic deficiency is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,081 Standard Supporter
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    It's been fucking maddening, and I still don't trust our defense.

    But still, our success this year is based on boat racing teams.
    It's constant flashbacks of Trace McSorely converting 3rd down after 3rd down against us. It started with Kent State and hasn't really stopped since.

    The good news is that this is presumably an easy fix. Morrell/Inge just need to repair whatever this schematic deficiency is.
    Our secondary sucks at covering during a scramble. It’s hard to do regardless, they are just worse than most at it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,926 Swaye's Wigwam
    The hope is things improve as more DBs get healthy. The good news is that the ones who have been playing are getting good experience during wins, not losses so far.

    But if the pass rush doesn’t continue to play like it did last week, teams like Ucla with shifty QBs (I like to say shifty when referring to QBs who can run and throw), will kick UW’s asses.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    If we are bashing Folgers coffee then I am OUT
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,348 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    Heat from the Edge

    with Penix pushing up the middle

    We need some HH shirts with a tagline about "Penix = more poundings" or "Penix poundigs to the rounding"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,686 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TheHB said:

    You’ll get no complaints from me about the offense. That pass D though … *shudder*

    8 sacks
    How many of those sacks ended a series though? Too many seemd to happen only for Stanford to make a 3rd and long play after.

    Bill must lurk here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,691
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    The problem with being a stats junkie is you think our fatal flaw is our pass rush and not our secondary
    Of course it's the secondary. But it's much more likely we start getting pressure on third downs then it is that the secondary suddenly becomes a strength.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,686 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited September 2022
    dnc said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    The problem with being a stats junkie is you think our fatal flaw is our pass rush and not our secondary
    Of course it's the secondary. But it's much more likely we start getting pressure on third downs then it is that the secondary suddenly becomes a strength.
    Mostly concerned about playing teams that either

    1. Throw the ball a lot and get it out quickly (USC)
    2. Have a mobile quarterback capable of breaking the pocket and scrambling (USC & UCLA)

    Lucky for us we? miss USC this year. UCLA will be another milquetoast measuring stick to continue to develop against.





    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,348 Founders Club
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    dnc said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    The problem with being a stats junkie is you think our fatal flaw is our pass rush and not our secondary
    Of course it's the secondary. But it's much more likely we start getting pressure on third downs then it is that the secondary suddenly becomes a strength.
    Mostly concerned about playing teams that either

    1. Throw the ball a lot and get it out quickly (USC)
    2. Have a mobile quarterback capable of breaking the pocket and scrambling (USC & UCLA)

    Lucky for us we? miss USC this year. UCLA will be another milquetoast measuring stick to continue to develop against.





    Such a Trooj homer @UW_Doog_Bot !
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,686 Swaye's Wigwam
    YellowSnow said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    dnc said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    The problem with being a stats junkie is you think our fatal flaw is our pass rush and not our secondary
    Of course it's the secondary. But it's much more likely we start getting pressure on third downs then it is that the secondary suddenly becomes a strength.
    Mostly concerned about playing teams that either

    1. Throw the ball a lot and get it out quickly (USC)
    2. Have a mobile quarterback capable of breaking the pocket and scrambling (USC & UCLA)

    Lucky for us we? miss USC this year. UCLA will be another milquetoast measuring stick to continue to develop against.





    Such a Trooj homer @UW_Doog_Bot !
    I've been watching their games. Offense is legit. Defense is meh but has enough talent that guys make plays and get turnovers.

    UW defense is not setup for 4/5 wides and a mobile qb all game with the current depth at dbacks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,728 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    dnc said:

    It's beautiful. There is however one major thing left for them to work on. From Bill Connelly's piece on flaws in playoff contenders:

    Washington
    Record (Week 4 result): 4-0 (defeated Stanford, 40-22)

    Rankings: 18th in AP, 24th in SP+, 18th in FPI

    Current odds of reaching CFP: 3.8%

    Fatal flaw: Getting the defense off the field. Washington's rebound has been immediate and comprehensive. A year after collapsing to 4-8, Kalen DeBoer's Huskies have already matched last year's win total, moving to 4-0 with Saturday night's comfortable win over Stanford. They sacked Cardinal quarterback Tanner McKee eight times in just 34 pass attempts, eased out to a 30-7 third-quarter lead and cruised.

    Only two of those sacks came on third or fourth down, however, downs in which Stanford averaged 5.4 yards per play with a decent (all things considered) 43% success rate. For the season, Washington ranks 91st in success rate allowed on third-and-long and 79th on third-and-medium. The Huskies are forcing opponents behind the chains, then letting them off the hook. Upcoming road games against UCLA and Oregon could end unhappily if the Huskies' defense remains that accommodating.

    The problem with being a stats junkie is you think our fatal flaw is our pass rush and not our secondary
    Of course it's the secondary. But it's much more likely we start getting pressure on third downs then it is that the secondary suddenly becomes a strength.
    The secondary not getting better is what makes it the fatal flaw. If the pass rush improves, it's not a fatal flaw
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,926 Swaye's Wigwam
    DerekJohnson said:

    Heat from the Edge

    with Penix pushing up the middle

    @Passion true?!?!?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.