Best
Comments
-
I remember when my posting when I'm not doing 90 on I 5 doing blow off a hookers ass phase.1to392831weretaken said:I remember my senile, not able to figure out the quote function phase.
-
Live look:MikeDamone said:
I remember when my posting when I'm not doing 90 on I 5 doing blow off a hookers ass phase.1to392831weretaken said:I remember my senile, not able to figure out the quote function phase.
-
-
Those peterman gifs are fucking legendarywhatshouldicareabout said:
Was he? I only remember Pete being angrybananasnblondes said:He wasn't nervously pacing and eye rolling like Petersen.
-
It’s been 7 years and this was the last time Huskies played at SC -
It’s been 7 years and this was the last time Huskies played at SCJaWarrenJaHooker said:
Sounds like the Pac 12 is trying to protect the Huskies. -
BUMPBaseman said:coach since James. Was Jens 4th choice (Aranda, Clawson, and Campbell) NIL still a joke but finding myself liking this guy more and more. It's Kent State, but still. Don't give a fuck, you win 90%+ at any level you're a dude.
-
I was rightMikeDamone said:
I remember my “they aren’t that bad, they are just running a limited playbook so not to tip off another opponent” phase.whatshouldicareabout said:
Part of me wonders how much they ran a vanilla defense as to not give MSU any film to prep. I didn't see any DBs blitz, no exotic stunts, and only 1 true LB blitz by Breuner.godawgst said:Greg Lewis said it best on Honks. Grubb/KD want to run it/be successful just enough to keeps the D honest. We go as far as Penix can throw us.
Rush D is concerning especially on edges. After Portland State scrimmage next two weeks will tell us much more as Sparty and Shaw will have zero problem 3/4/4 yards runs all night long keeping Offense off field, limiting possessions.
Big picture is this staff believes if they can get into high 30's, low 40's ppg, on defense if they can get 1-2 stops per half mission accomplished and they believe taking chances will result in a higher % of a sack/turnover/holding penalty killing that drive.
I'm guessing we'll see them open the playbook for MSU
42 rushing yards on 29 carries, with 1 carry going for 21 yards on that QB scramble -
Dialed in.UW_Doog_Bot said:Offense looked good and it was at least fun to watch the receivers getting work after so much waisted hype the last few years. Offensive line was concerning and too many necessary 3rd down conversions.
Special teams lol.
Defense looked fucking sloppy and lazy. Watching tacklers run into each other and take one another out of the play triggered Sark PTSD. Out of position in the secondary what seemed like every 2nd-3rd play. Dline didn't dominate against a bunch of nobodies so don't expect anything when they play anyone with a pulse.
This is a Sark repeat until it isn't. Clean up the special teams and defense and I'll start to doog. Until then they suck until they don't.
I look forward to losing the Alamo Bowel 56-67
@DerekJohnson -
Since we are playing Sark in the Alamo I think we have a shot to win it 67-56.UW_Doog_Bot said:Offense looked good and it was at least fun to watch the receivers getting work after so much waisted hype the last few years. Offensive line was concerning and too many necessary 3rd down conversions.
Special teams lol.
Defense looked fucking sloppy and lazy. Watching tacklers run into each other and take one another out of the play triggered Sark PTSD. Out of position in the secondary what seemed like every 2nd-3rd play. Dline didn't dominate against a bunch of nobodies so don't expect anything when they play anyone with a pulse.
This is a Sark repeat until it isn't. Clean up the special teams and defense and I'll start to doog. Until then they suck until they don't.
I look forward to losing the Alamo Bowel 56-67
