Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The cupboard for sark was bare/
MikeDamone
Member Posts: 37,781
Except it wasn't. Here is a handy chart to remind doogs you encounter that sark did not inherit zero win talent.
All players down to Trufant were on the roster when Sark arrived.
All players down to Trufant were on the roster when Sark arrived.
Comments
-
Yea but still.
-
-
Definitely not zero win talent...the cupboard was not bare by any means....but that is 10th out of 12 teams in the conference.
$C has 55 guys in the league over the same time period. -
Because it keeps coming up on doogman and doogs still bring it up in conversation. Just giving some talking points to help people out.PurpleReign said:
If you don't like it or need it then fuck off.
Thanks for reading. -
Weve established this Dmone. The question is Petersen. How is his team more stocked? I know sark had better linebackers (which was a huge problem Saturday) and Chris Polk, Jake Locker and those receivers would have made mince meat of Hawaii. (And sark ran a pure pro-style offense then)
-
This team isn't more stocked now. More proof that Sark was't a great recruiter.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Weve established this Dmone. The question is Petersen. How is his team more stocked? I know sark had better linebackers (which was a huge problem Saturday) and Chris Polk, Jake Locker and those receivers would have made mince meat of Hawaii. (And sark ran a pure pro-style offense then)
Did you read what I wrote futtbucker? I said this is something the doogs still bring up a lot, and it's just a handy quick reference guide to shut them up. I used it last week. The doog was left with "yeah, but still".
-
I posted on Dawgman that Sark was over rated as a recruiter due to what we saw Saturday night. Some Troons showed up and start quoting recruiting rankings. I mean who cares what is actually on the field, let's talk teen boy stalking ranks!
Yes, my dead dog can recruit to USC but so did Paul Hackett.
You need smart recruiting and player development at UW and Sark had neither.
-
-
You forgot Owen Twelve
-
-
You think any of our current O-linemen get drafted?
-
But how does this make Sark a bad coach?
-
Maybe Hatchie, he was a 4 star. The rest of the starting O-line 3, 2, 2, & 2 stars. Although Shelton does remind me of Stan Empterman, so he might be a first round pick!PurpleJ said:You think any of our current O-linemen get drafted?
-
Shelton is nothing like Empterman. Will Dissily OTOH, has the football IQ and intangibles that remind me a lot of #90.Hippopeteamus said:
Maybe Hatchie, he was a 4 star. The rest of the starting O-line 3, 2, 2, & 2 stars. Although Shelton does remind me of Stan Empterman, so he might be a first round pick!PurpleJ said:You think any of our current O-linemen get drafted?
-
-
This doesn't. Sark makes himself a bad coach.topdawgnc said:But how does this make Sark a bad coach?
And, the cupboard will always be barer (than at any other time) before Sark came to WA. "Bark for Sark" - damn I glad that is over. -
Whenever I see the word bare, I think of pickles.
-
Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
-
At least we dodged the Jack Heaps bullet.
-
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
-
And Sark has Kessler this year to coach. Once again, another QB he didn't recruit.
Jake Locker
Keith Price
Cody Kessler
Max Browne is probably next... yet another QB he didn't recruit. -
On field performance >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>starsdnc said:
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
HTH
-
Manziel and Mariota AGREEMikeDamone said:
On field performance >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>starsdnc said:
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
HTH
-
You haven't really refuted my point. If Lindquist was the best option in a world without Miley Cyrus, it's the perfect position to illustrate that.dnc said:
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
(And don't forget, Keith Price was a Willingham guy). -
Did Trufant commit to willingham or Sark?DerekJohnson said:
You haven't really refuted my point. If Lindquist was the best option in a world without Miley Cyrus, it's the perfect position to illustrate that.dnc said:
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
(And don't forget, Keith Price was a Willingham guy). -
I'm not sure.MikeDamone said:
Did Trufant commit to willingham or Sark?DerekJohnson said:
You haven't really refuted my point. If Lindquist was the best option in a world without Miley Cyrus, it's the perfect position to illustrate that.dnc said:
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
(And don't forget, Keith Price was a Willingham guy). -
You call yourself a journalist?DerekJohnson said:
I'm not sure.MikeDamone said:
Did Trufant commit to willingham or Sark?DerekJohnson said:
You haven't really refuted my point. If Lindquist was the best option in a world without Miley Cyrus, it's the perfect position to illustrate that.dnc said:
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
(And don't forget, Keith Price was a Willingham guy). -
2 of those 3 FOURSTAR quarterbacks, are too shitty to score against Hawaii.
-
SarkMikeDamone said:
Did Trufant commit to willingham or Sark?DerekJohnson said:
You haven't really refuted my point. If Lindquist was the best option in a world without Miley Cyrus, it's the perfect position to illustrate that.dnc said:
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
(And don't forget, Keith Price was a Willingham guy). -
Being left with one quality QB with three years eligibility left and some starting experience (Cyrus) and another quality development prospect (Williams) with four years eligibility is a lot more than most new coaches inherit.DerekJohnson said:
You haven't really refuted my point. If Lindquist was the best option in a world without Miley Cyrus, it's the perfect position to illustrate that.dnc said:
Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.DerekJohnson said:Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.
(And don't forget, Keith Price was a Willingham guy).
Again, QB isn't the problem. If Miles wasn't suspended for a game we'd never be having this conversation.
