The cupboard for sark was bare/

MikeDamone

Except it wasn't. Here is a handy chart to remind doogs you encounter that sark did not inherit zero win talent.

All players down to Trufant were on the roster when Sark arrived.

CuntWaffle

Yea but still.

PurpleReign

HuskyJW

Definitely not zero win talent...the cupboard was not bare by any means....but that is 10th out of 12 teams in the conference.

$C has 55 guys in the league over the same time period.

MikeDamone

PurpleReign said:

Because it keeps coming up on doogman and doogs still bring it up in conversation. Just giving some talking points to help people out.

If you don't like it or need it then fuck off.

Thanks for reading.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Weve established this Dmone. The question is Petersen. How is his team more stocked? I know sark had better linebackers (which was a huge problem Saturday) and Chris Polk, Jake Locker and those receivers would have made mince meat of Hawaii. (And sark ran a pure pro-style offense then)

MikeDamone

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Weve established this Dmone. The question is Petersen. How is his team more stocked? I know sark had better linebackers (which was a huge problem Saturday) and Chris Polk, Jake Locker and those receivers would have made mince meat of Hawaii. (And sark ran a pure pro-style offense then)

This team isn't more stocked now. More proof that Sark was't a great recruiter.

Did you read what I wrote futtbucker? I said this is something the doogs still bring up a lot, and it's just a handy quick reference guide to shut them up. I used it last week. The doog was left with "yeah, but still".

RaceBannon

I posted on Dawgman that Sark was over rated as a recruiter due to what we saw Saturday night. Some Troons showed up and start quoting recruiting rankings. I mean who cares what is actually on the field, let's talk teen boy stalking ranks!

Yes, my dead dog can recruit to USC but so did Paul Hackett.

You need smart recruiting and player development at UW and Sark had neither.

PurpleReign

79smoothdawg

You forgot Owen Twelve

PurpleJ

PurpleJ

You think any of our current O-linemen get drafted?

topdawgnc

But how does this make Sark a bad coach?

Hippopeteamus

PurpleJ said:

You think any of our current O-linemen get drafted?

Maybe Hatchie, he was a 4 star. The rest of the starting O-line 3, 2, 2, & 2 stars. Although Shelton does remind me of Stan Empterman, so he might be a first round pick!

dnc

Hippopeteamus said:

PurpleJ said:

You think any of our current O-linemen get drafted?

Maybe Hatchie, he was a 4 star. The rest of the starting O-line 3, 2, 2, & 2 stars. Although Shelton does remind me of Stan Empterman, so he might be a first round pick!

Shelton is nothing like Empterman. Will Dissily OTOH, has the football IQ and intangibles that remind me a lot of #90.

PurpleReign

Homebrew_Dawg

topdawgnc said:

But how does this make Sark a bad coach?

This doesn't. Sark makes himself a bad coach.

And, the cupboard will always be barer (than at any other time) before Sark came to WA. "Bark for Sark" - damn I glad that is over.

Swaye

Whenever I see the word bare, I think of pickles.

AtomicPiss

Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.

PurpleReign

At least we dodged the Jack Heaps bullet.

dnc

DerekJohnson said:

Look at our our vulnerability at the QB position and then tell me what a great recruiter and developer Sark was.

Agreed on developer, but he left three four star QB's with a combined ten seasons of eligibility. Sark wasn't the great recruiter he's hailed to be but QB is the wrong position to illustrate that.