Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Does Peterman bench a few starters?

I have watched the game three times now, and watched it the last time after having taken notes from what some of you had seen and posted about.

Conclusion, since Peterman inherited most of the roster, he doesn't give a flying fuck who starts, he is not emotionally driven to keep a guy on the field who is fucking up. and he has a roaster to pick and choose from. The OL sucked. Who will he bench and who will come in? Is Lindy related to the woodshed for stinking up the opportunity? If so, who starts? Is Miles still in the dog house? Does Mickens continue as a punt returner? If not, do you put Ross back there?

I doubt Peterman stands pat with his hand.
«134

Comments

  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    Everyone has known all along that Miles is starting the second game.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,839 Swaye's Wigwam
    I'm not much good at rating OL, but if I'm in charge it will take a miracle for Atoe to play himself back into the starting lineup let alone the 1st round of the draft.
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    How about benching a few coaches? Kawasaki, Strausser, and Smith.

    Fuck Sark, but in one game I'm already questioning defensive coaching, and missing Wilcox. Kawasaki's bend-but-don't-break bullshit has me waking up in a cold sweat after a nightmare featuring nick holt.

    Peterman better out a stop to this shit right now.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Passion said:

    How about benching a few coaches? Kawasaki, Strausser, and Smith.

    Fuck Sark, but in one game I'm already questioning defensive coaching, and missing Wilcox. Kawasaki's bend-but-don't-break bullshit has me waking up in a cold sweat after a nightmare featuring nick holt.

    Peterman better out a stop to this shit right now.

    Kawasaki? is this some running joke here I've missed?
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,682 Founders Club
    I was actually fine with playing off of the receivers for the first game. Peters should be able to do whatever you need him to do, but you'd rather the opposing offense drive the length of the field off of short/medium gains than completely burn a brand new db and shatter his confidence. We obviously won't be able to protect them from here on out though.
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 3,023
    edited September 2014
    The "Wilcox is the greatest" has got to stop. UW replaces 3/4 in the secondary and QB, hence my tempered expectations. Even though this secondary has great natural talent, they need experience. You do not run press coverage all over the field with 1 over the top in the first game with this experience. If you can't see that I can't help you. LIFPO
  • SteveInShelton
    SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    I said it in the game thread, but if Jermaine Kelly isn't playing off his guy he is going to get beat over the top every time. He is very bad right now.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Vegasdawg said:

    I have watched the game three times now, and watched it the last time after having taken notes from what some of you had seen and posted about.

    Conclusion, since Peterman inherited most of the roster, he doesn't give a flying fuck who starts, he is not emotionally driven to keep a guy on the field who is fucking up. and he has a roaster to pick and choose from. The OL sucked. Who will he bench and who will come in? Is Lindy related to the woodshed for stinking up the opportunity? If so, who starts? Is Miles still in the dog house? Does Mickens continue as a punt returner? If not, do you put Ross back there?

    I doubt Peterman stands pat with his hand.

    LEAVE!