Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Big Lie being blown to bits

2

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
    Sounds like the Schiff kind of evidence.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,030
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    You misspelled Kangaroo Court.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,554 Standard Supporter
    edited June 2022
    Geezus. The opposition was supposed to show up under House rules, but the Nazi Pelosi refused the republican participants. I'm sure you knew this, but given the chance to be honest or suck Pelosi's dick, well ...
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,436 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,643 Founders Club
    Agreed, some of us can.


    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


    So you admit the pre-emptive pardon crew didn't show. I guess we can agree on that at least.

    #5thAmendment
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Geezus. The opposition was supposed to show up under House rules, but the Nazi Pelosi refused the republican participants. I'm sure you knew this, but given the chance to be honest or suck Pelosi's dick, well ...

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    They love to lie and they love being lied to. By every definition of the term this is nothing more than a show trial where one side picks both the prosecution and the "defense"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Geezus. The opposition was supposed to show up under House rules, but the Nazi Pelosi refused the republican participants. I'm sure you knew this, but given the chance to be honest or suck Pelosi's dick, well ...

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Imagine Jim Jordan investigating his own felonies.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,554 Standard Supporter
    Where is Ray Epps? I want him to testify. The dazzler doesn't. That's the definition of a Soviet show trial.

    PS The dazzler wants my guns. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,030
    Liz Cheney and Adam Schiff are the ones screaming "we have the evidence".

    So credible.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited June 2022
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Where is Ray Epps? I want him to testify. The dazzler doesn't. That's the definition of a Soviet show trial.

    PS The dazzler wants my guns. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    All the evidence that's presented is selected by the prosecution. But hey, this isn't a show trial.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    Okay, so Barr is a corrupt liar who is willing to lie under oath.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    Okay, so Barr is a corrupt liar who is willing to lie under oath.
    When did he ever say that under oath?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    I'm not the one who is calling Barr a corrupt liar Kunt, you are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    I've listened to every minute of the hearings so far. Haven't heard anything of substance yet. Nothing damning against Trump. Maybe something will come up, but I don't expect it to.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,146 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    What an absolute miserable dumb cunt you are. Fuck off shitstain!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    RoadTrip said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    What an absolute miserable dumb cunt you are. Fuck off shitstain!
    Compelling argument.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    What an absolute miserable dumb cunt you are. Fuck off shitstain!
    Compelling argument.
    Almost as compelling an argument as you're providing Dazzler. Supoenaed witnesses are part of the defense. Brillant Kunt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    Fenderbender123 said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    I've listened to every minute of the hearings so far. Haven't heard anything of substance yet. Nothing damning against Trump. Maybe something will come up, but I don't expect it to.
    What is your first language?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,704 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
    Zero proof then. Should be easy. I'll wait dipshit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter