Beating a dead horse

Tequilla said:

EwaDawg said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

Doesn’t matter at minimum until Jen is out

The coach matters. Jenn is the ultimate anchor but Halfley or whoever the fuck, Wilcock, or even Smith would have been a disaster. Same with the XFL coach.

So the boosters approved a developer with a great system and trying to out-scout people. It makes a lot of sense even though yeah, I agree with the HHP guys that the 5 million difference should be spent somewhere useful toward the getting talent.

Everything I’ve heard is that DeBoer was the backup plan to Campbell and Jen couldn’t close Campbell

DeBoer has as many red flags as he has positives

Please itemize his positives and negatives (red flags) without your usual tequillaesque empty verbiage. TYFYS

Quick list here

Positives:

History of improvements/winning at every level

Offensive focus

History of leading programs

Negatives:

Limited P5 experience and none as a HC; P5 experience at bottom half of conference school

Massive uptick when it comes to recruiting required

Balance of staff came with him from G5; historically that isn’t a positive indicator

With control of a divisional title in hand, followed up beating San Diego St by getting blown out by Boise … losing to Boise isn’t the crime … losing 40-14 with the 2nd TD coming with 1:10 remaining isn’t good

Tequilla said:

chuck said:

EwaDawg said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

Doesn’t matter at minimum until Jen is out

The coach matters. Jenn is the ultimate anchor but Halfley or whoever the fuck, Wilcock, or even Smith would have been a disaster. Same with the XFL coach.

So the boosters approved a developer with a great system and trying to out-scout people. It makes a lot of sense even though yeah, I agree with the HHP guys that the 5 million difference should be spent somewhere useful toward the getting talent.

Everything I’ve heard is that DeBoer was the backup plan to Campbell and Jen couldn’t close Campbell

DeBoer has as many red flags as he has positives

Please itemize his positives and negatives (red flags) without your usual tequillaesque empty verbiage. TYFYS

I'm not in the mood for a war of words with Teq or anyone else, but he keeps making thst unsupported statement. DeBoer's "red flag" is that he's a new guy at this level with limited recruiting experience outside of the FSU or Indiana tier. Everything else thst matters...past success, good offenses, teams thst play and hit hard, and teams thst play up to the competition...is a positive.

UW should be able to hire a big time coach from the same lists thst the blue blood programs hire from. I get the disgust. It's all image bullshit though. If Deboer is good, and there are zero signs that he's not, the name recognition nonsense will stop being a factor within a season or two.

Not interested in a war of words

If going the G5 route for hiring DeBoer was probably the most realistic hire

I think he’s got a lot of mileage out of almost beating Oregon and beating a relatively mediocre UCLA team … the stats in Mountain West play aren’t eye popping impressive and fall in the slightly above conference average range

The recruiting stuff is what it is at this point … not convinced that he and his staff can’t recruit but they need to close a good class before those concerns ease

The Boise loss last year to me is a massive red flag

Tequilla said:

YellowSnow said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

Doesn’t matter at minimum until Jen is out

The coach matters. Jenn is the ultimate anchor but Halfley or whoever the fuck, Wilcock, or even Smith would have been a disaster. Same with the XFL coach.

So the boosters approved a developer with a great system and trying to out-scout people. It makes a lot of sense even though yeah, I agree with the HHP guys that the 5 million difference should be spent somewhere useful toward the getting talent.

Everything I’ve heard is that DeBoer was the backup plan to Campbell and Jen couldn’t close Campbell

DeBoer has as many red flags as he has positives

There's not ton of evidence to suggest though that Campbell is more likely to win at UW than DeBoner.

It’s always a crap shoot to be sure and past performance doesn’t guarantee future success

But I’d bet on Campbell to provide a better opportunity for success

Jen went bargain hunting which is largely consistent in how she runs the AD

RaceBannon said:

This was a historic off season for coaching changes and big money

Reilly and Brian Kelly along with Brian Kelly left big time jobs for bigger jobs and money leaving big openings at Oklahoma and Norte Dame, midwest schools, one in the Big 12

UW and Cohen went cheap and Matt Campbell was a pussy and stayed in Ames

Both are true

No one could win in Corvallis until Dennis did. No one can win at Nebraska now. Allegedly

Winners win. DeBoer deserves a game or two to find out

Most coaches suck including most of the options for the Huskies

But USC was a clear winner. The best bet is steal a winner. Still not a lock but still

Lanning probably sucks too so there's that

Pitchfork51 said:

Haie you nerd. Aren't you like my age? That shit was a PowerPoint on blackboard.com

Who the fuck goes to the library


Only time I ever went I can't remember the reason but several of us cheated on some online Beatles and American music course or some shit.

Not sure why we went there. Maybe internet was out somewhere else



Oregon state was rigorous academis