Global Warming update
Comments
-
I think HH website is really here to push your conservative agenda or hopefully libertarian agenda. Sneaky Derek, sneaky. If you still hold a republican card you might as well hold a democrat card. The repubs left you out in the cold long ago.
-
I'm a fiscal conservative and a libertarian. HTH.
-
Bitter and political
-
I'm a hippie
-
Isn't it something that when you provide evidence contrary to a deeply held belief, instead of debating the issue, liberals will usually try to attack your character instead?
-
No need for abundance when using synonyms.DerekJohnson said:I'm a fiscal conservative and a libertarian. HTH.
-
Too bad there is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
HTH -
It's no fun when your party you so dearly loved and supported take a giant shit all over you. When you wake up and realize they don't give two fucks about you gets real bitter. Shit gets real dark, and then you start hating everything. I have seen the tumble with my own eyes it ain't pretty.MikeDamone said:Bitter and political
-
Planet hating naziDerekJohnson said:Isn't it something that when you provide evidence contrary to a deeply held belief, instead of debating the issue, liberals will usually try to attack your character instead?
-
What are you taking about?jecornel said:
It's no fun when your party you so dearly loved and supported take a giant shit all over you. When you wake up and realize they don't give two fucks about you gets real bitter. Shit gets real dark, and then you start hating everything. I have seen the tumble with my own eyes it ain't pretty.MikeDamone said:Bitter and political
-
Jesus and George.MikeDamone said:
What are you taking about?jecornel said:MikeDamone said:Bitter and political
It's no fun when your party you so dearly loved and supported take a giant shit all over you. When you wake up and realize they don't give two fucks about you gets real bitter. Shit gets real dark, and then you start hating everything. I have seen the tumble with my own eyes it ain't pretty. -
Name the other two Beatlesjecornel said:
Jesus and George.MikeDamone said:
What are you taking about?jecornel said:MikeDamone said:Bitter and political
It's no fun when your party you so dearly loved and supported take a giant shit all over you. When you wake up and realize they don't give two fucks about you gets real bitter. Shit gets real dark, and then you start hating everything. I have seen the tumble with my own eyes it ain't pretty. -
97% of scientists are corrupt pinkos. Thank gawd 4 scientists hired by Heritage, Exxxon, BP, and Shell. They tell the truth, just like cigarette scientists.
-
Yes, could one of you guys that denies climate change please explain why you think those 97% of scientists are wrong?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:97% of scientists are corrupt pinkos. Thank gawd 4 scientists hired by Heritage, Exxxon, BP, and Shell. They tell the truth, just like cigarette scientists.
-
Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
-
I'm 81% sure as well
-
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy -
Stop making up statistics about scientists.TheKobeStopper said:
Yes, could one of you guys that denies climate change please explain why you think those 97% of scientists are wrong?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:97% of scientists are corrupt pinkos. Thank gawd 4 scientists hired by Heritage, Exxxon, BP, and Shell. They tell the truth, just like cigarette scientists.
-
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you. -
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you. -
you've sworn complete allegiance and faith in the mainstream but suddenly cast grave suspicion toward someone with opposing data.TheKobeStopper said:
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you.
-
I thought we were calling it "climate change" now....
-
please leave the climate talk to Climate superiority guys such as @Mad_son and myself
-
-
Is anyone worried about causation? That's what I thought.DerekJohnson said:
you've sworn complete allegiance and faith in the mainstream but suddenly cast grave suspicion toward someone with opposing data.TheKobeStopper said:
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you. -
They don't have opposing data. They have a graph from a different website that shows nothing that comes close to contradicting climate change.DerekJohnson said:
you've sworn complete allegiance and faith in the mainstream but suddenly cast grave suspicion toward someone with opposing data.TheKobeStopper said:
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you.
You're using a website as evidence, please tell me where that website gets its funding from.
It has nothing to do with faith or allegiance to anything. 9/11 truthers, Holocaust deniers, climate change deniers, intelligent designers, anti vaxers, it's about knowing when you're getting hoodwinked. And youre radar is fucking broken. -
Oh please go on.MikeDamone said:
Is anyone worried about causation? That's what I thought.DerekJohnson said:
you've sworn complete allegiance and faith in the mainstream but suddenly cast grave suspicion toward someone with opposing data.TheKobeStopper said:
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you. -
I was against global warming but now I am for it.
-
I am against the warming, but support the globe.
![[Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/9a297bf014c1b89df45e7c59b363baaa_100.png)