Global Warming update
Comments
-
you've sworn complete allegiance and faith in the mainstream but suddenly cast grave suspicion toward someone with opposing data.TheKobeStopper said:
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you.
-
I thought we were calling it "climate change" now....
-
please leave the climate talk to Climate superiority guys such as @Mad_son and myself
-
-
Is anyone worried about causation? That's what I thought.DerekJohnson said:
you've sworn complete allegiance and faith in the mainstream but suddenly cast grave suspicion toward someone with opposing data.TheKobeStopper said:
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you. -
They don't have opposing data. They have a graph from a different website that shows nothing that comes close to contradicting climate change.DerekJohnson said:
you've sworn complete allegiance and faith in the mainstream but suddenly cast grave suspicion toward someone with opposing data.TheKobeStopper said:
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you.
You're using a website as evidence, please tell me where that website gets its funding from.
It has nothing to do with faith or allegiance to anything. 9/11 truthers, Holocaust deniers, climate change deniers, intelligent designers, anti vaxers, it's about knowing when you're getting hoodwinked. And youre radar is fucking broken. -
Oh please go on.MikeDamone said:
Is anyone worried about causation? That's what I thought.DerekJohnson said:
you've sworn complete allegiance and faith in the mainstream but suddenly cast grave suspicion toward someone with opposing data.TheKobeStopper said:
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you. -
I was against global warming but now I am for it.
-
I am against the warming, but support the globe.
![[Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/9a297bf014c1b89df45e7c59b363baaa_100.png)