Global Warming update
Comments
-
I want another ice age
-
RaceBannon said:
Doogs deserve another ice age
-
a four yr old blurb from the Murdoch owned WSJ. NiceDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
four yr old article -
just so you can be right?RaceBannon said:I want another ice age
-
Here is a study that came out recently. It's interesting, or not.
nature.com/ngeo/journal/v6/n8/full/ngeo1874.html
science20.com/news_articles/are_loss_projections_ice_sheets_greenland_and_antarctic_high_or_low_yes-116357 -
If the ice caps melt, it will be interesting. If we hit another ice age, it will be interesting.MikeDamone said:Here is a study that came out recently. It's interesting, or not.
nature.com/ngeo/journal/v6/n8/full/ngeo1874.html
science20.com/news_articles/are_loss_projections_ice_sheets_greenland_and_antarctic_high_or_low_yes-116357
Either way, it will be interesting.
-
I dont know why everyone has always gotta be all Nega-Scientist when talking about anthropogenic global warming... I only ever see articles talking about oceans rising 30 feet, polar bears dying, and shitty island nations disappearing...
why not do a study on the possible positives of the "projected" global warming like higher inland rainfall totals, increased land usage at higher latitudes, year round northern passage shipping lanes, longer growing seasons, and the destruction of Miami and New Orleans for starters
not everything is bad, from a biology and human survival standpoint an ice age (or cooling by a few degrees) is much more dangerous than global warming -
Obviously the last point is a matter of scale. Recent glacial maxima only made some places unlivable, much like how (anticipated) global warming will only make some places unlivable. Due to the much smaller circumference near the poles than at the equator the balance of land that becomes accessible to agriculture may not offset the increased desertification of current marginal farm land, but ultimately those are the sorts of matters that are currently actually debatable.Houhusky said:I dont know why everyone has always gotta be all Nega-Scientist when talking about anthropogenic global warming... I only ever see articles talking about oceans rising 30 feet, polar bears dying, and shitty island nations disappearing...
why not do a study on the possible positives of the "projected" global warming like higher inland rainfall totals, increased land usage at higher latitudes, year round northern passage shipping lanes, longer growing seasons, and the destruction of Miami and New Orleans for starters
not everything is bad, from a biology and human survival standpoint an ice age (or cooling by a few degrees) is much more dangerous than global warming
-
The little ice age decimated Europe. Wait......
-
"Decimated"RaceBannon said:The little ice age decimated Europe. Wait......
Conditions of the Little Ice Age are much more favorable than many of the possible outcomes of continued global warming. As I said before, the questions are a matter of "how much". Not "if".
