Global Warming update
Comments
-
Jesus and George.MikeDamone said:
What are you taking about?jecornel said:MikeDamone said:Bitter and political
It's no fun when your party you so dearly loved and supported take a giant shit all over you. When you wake up and realize they don't give two fucks about you gets real bitter. Shit gets real dark, and then you start hating everything. I have seen the tumble with my own eyes it ain't pretty. -
Name the other two Beatlesjecornel said:
Jesus and George.MikeDamone said:
What are you taking about?jecornel said:MikeDamone said:Bitter and political
It's no fun when your party you so dearly loved and supported take a giant shit all over you. When you wake up and realize they don't give two fucks about you gets real bitter. Shit gets real dark, and then you start hating everything. I have seen the tumble with my own eyes it ain't pretty. -
97% of scientists are corrupt pinkos. Thank gawd 4 scientists hired by Heritage, Exxxon, BP, and Shell. They tell the truth, just like cigarette scientists.
-
Yes, could one of you guys that denies climate change please explain why you think those 97% of scientists are wrong?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:97% of scientists are corrupt pinkos. Thank gawd 4 scientists hired by Heritage, Exxxon, BP, and Shell. They tell the truth, just like cigarette scientists.
-
Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
-
I'm 81% sure as well
-
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy -
Stop making up statistics about scientists.TheKobeStopper said:
Yes, could one of you guys that denies climate change please explain why you think those 97% of scientists are wrong?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:97% of scientists are corrupt pinkos. Thank gawd 4 scientists hired by Heritage, Exxxon, BP, and Shell. They tell the truth, just like cigarette scientists.
-
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you. -
Who funds that foundation?DerekJohnson said:
Oh KobeStopper, so young, so naive...TheKobeStopper said:
Oops. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/16/climate-change-scienceofclimatechangeDerekJohnson said:Your 97% was pulled out of the ether every bit as Eklund's 81%
If all these mainstream scientists had truth on their side they needn't resort to this kind of thing:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html
As far as "climategate" goes, here, I'll dumb it down for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
"In the meantime it would appear that the Arctic has re-gained a record amount of ice this winter." Hmmmm
thegwpf.org/arctic-sea-ice/
You're a sweet kid. Don't let anyone ever change that about you.
