Snippet from today's article in The Athletic

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

Are you high? Wrestling in the 70s and 80s was unsurpassed. When was Wrestlmania 3? That’s what I thought.

How old are you?

YellowSnow said:

haie said:

JoeEDangerously said:

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

Greatest swerve in history. Haie’s swerve seems forced and unnecessary

I think the current head coach will be good. AD is shit, Pete was overrated. NIL hate and all that is schtick and uninformed. I don't see where my position changed.

I hate Vorel (moreso the Seattle Times) and the Athletic beat writer and always have.

This bored secretly begs for Sark and exposed Joey's tabs and some coffee cups served up to recruits who never even fucking played here, and some side stories of getting the one off Shaq Thompson types, because it's more entertaining.

But none of those things got us to playoffs and rose bowls in the modern era, let alone conference championships.

Tequilla and Coker think they do though, because they're fluff lords.

UW got to the playoffs in a different era of college football. Does Budda Baker come to UW now?

Tequilla said:

DerekJohnson said:

Cohen replied, in part: “There’s two issues at Washington that are concerning. One is that people are so breaking the rules with inducement. They’re taking kids away from schools. Until the NCAA starts to enforce it — and I think they will make an example of a couple schools. I think they have to. There’s a lot of pressure to do that. But we’re not going to be in that lane. You don’t want us to be in that lane. But we are in the lane of trying to find every student-athlete at Washington who wants an NIL deal, an NIL deal.”

This made my blood boil