Dazzler is this another issue you don't support but vote for anyway?
Comments
-
Pawz is onboard
-
"49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."
No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar. -
Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
So now we should trust doctors instead of bureaucrats and pharmacists for personnel health decisions?HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.MikeDamone said:
What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
Gosnell says hold my beer.HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”
Fuck off -
Muh horse paste!Bob_C said:
So now we should trust doctors instead of bureaucrats and pharmacists for personnel health decisions?HHusky said:
Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.MikeDamone said:Yes, they did…
a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:
9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.
Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.
Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?
“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed” -
Inslee says hold my beer.
Dazzler, fuck off.
