My body MY CHOICE
Comments
-
CuntWaffle said:

Speaking of stupid fat fucks who need to DIAFF....
Did the Dazzler go all Vietnamese monk on us?
-
Stop teasing.PurpleThrobber said:CuntWaffle said:
Speaking of stupid fat fucks who need to DIAFF....
Did the Dazzler go all Vietnamese monk on us? -
Much like assless chaps, all new TV’s are flatscreenSledog said: -
I think a decent compromise is to allow it but restrict it to 8-12 weeks.Sledog said:
Allow 0 weeks. I didn't think about abortion that much until I had kids. Could never imagine killing them. If you can you need help.SFGbob said:
20 weeks is way too long. 12 should be the max. Hell France only allows 10 weeks.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I get tired of the media fueled abortion debate but how is limiting it to the first 20 weeks unreasonable?
-
The transphobia here, smdh
-
Pick a lane Gavin.GrundleStiltzkin said:The transphobia here, smdh
-
Sounds like he doesn’t like being controlled.46XiJCAB said:
Pick a lane Gavin.GrundleStiltzkin said:The transphobia here, smdh
Newsom closes all Orange County beaches. Local officials call it an 'act of retribution'
https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2020/04/30/newsom-closes-all-orange-county-beaches-despite-growing-political-backlash-1281581 -
What is a woman? Axing for my lefty frens.
Ts n Ps. -
I think if you're looking for a clear, brightline rule, this is the one. But I can't help but think at a minimum that people that have had circumstances thrust on them deserve some sort of exception.creepycoug said:There are some weird takes on this issue. It's one thing to want to protect state's rights, but some things are pretty fundamental. That's why you can't have slaves in some states and not others.
I've done some thinking about this, and my views have evolved. As much as it sucks to have more derelicts born into society every day and inevitably increase the welfare state, nobody has been able to make a thought-provoking argument to draw the line anywhere. If you can't draw the line, the Catholics are right: at conception. The rest, my body, viability, rape, incest, save the mother, etc, is just mental masturbation. There is no reconciling it. It is morally unacceptable.
There is literally no justification for it. Human life at conception, period. No ifs, ands or butts. Are you allowed to kill an innocent bystander to save yourself? Or because the bystander has inconvenienced you? Did the fetus rape you? Is the fetus responsible for threatening your life? No, no, no and no.
States rights is perhaps the most retarded of arguments. We don't leave it to state legislatures to define what life is and where it begins, and we certainly don't leave it to the voters to decide that it's ok to just randomly kill somebody. "Watch out on your vacation to Glacier Sammy! The voters in Montana have approved the right of citizens to randomly kill people that they view as inconvenient." Please. Stop with this business.
Roe v. Wade should be overturned, and abortion should be ruled unconstitutional throughout the land.
So, no abortion, ever, in any circumstances. That's the right answer. I can draw no other conclusion.
I know rape is the scenario everyone loves to point to because it's extreme, but I think it's a valid example. And quite honestly, I wouldn't want a rapist procreating anyway. Same can be said for minor abuse, etc.
More broadly, as someone who thinks our population levels are fucked anyway, I'm all for culling the herd a bit. I'm not religious, so I don't worry about any of that side of things,
For me, the issue is:when does an abortion blur into something that could be considered murder. I land on viability. By then, there's no longer an excuse - plenty of time to have "addressed" the problem and the unborn child is just that - a child.
YMMV (but if you disagree, fuck off)






