One thing the renewal of Roe has done is ferret out the real conservatives from the fake ones. I always knew Race's dirty hippy past had to have done some damage and was lurking around in there somewhere; but he's a complicated man from the BHL triangle of tuffness, and as a member of the correct and righteous sect of Christianity, we? forgive him for his tolerances on this issue.
But finding some cracks in the Oregon bros has been enlightening. OTOH, having the Fire Marshall admit online that he's down with killing babies "up to a certain point" was hardly surprising.
One thing the renewal of Roe has done is ferret out the real conservatives from the fake ones. I always knew Race's dirty hippy past had to have done some damage and was lurking around in there somewhere; but he's a complicated man from the BHL triangle of tuffness, and as a member of the correct and righteous sect of Christianity, we? forgive him for his tolerances on this issue.
But finding some cracks in the Oregon bros has been enlightening. OTOH, having the Fire Marshall admit online that he's down with killing babies "up to a certain point" was hardly surprising.
Sleddy and I are praying for you guys.
Pretty good tim to be a Classical Liberal. To be honest.
I get tired of the media fueled abortion debate but how is limiting it to the first 20 weeks unreasonable?
It’s unreasonable because the life of a 19 week old person is at least as morally significant as yours is you dumb box of rocks.
Hope that was helpful.
You're unhinged. Again. Probably butt hurt because I didn't go to your wine and cheese bored after you begged me. Fuck off faggot.
Noted Baby Killer heard from.
The very idea that you think I actually wanted a retard like you swapping IQs with some of our finest thinkers here is Exhibit A-10,000 of your retardation.
If I asked you to join, and I don’t recall doing so, it was for traffic numbers and that is it. You’ve always struck me as quite poor anyway, so what could you have added other than how to scam welfare and social security bennies? Answer: nada. That’s Spanish for “nothing” you undereducated cretin.
Although, and this will require some thought, with my new stance of zero tolerance for infringing on the inalienable rights of an innocent person, we have to think long and hard about the inherent tensions between true liberty and holding to account the cum dumpers themselves.
As a practical matter of gender roles, with which I agree btw, women wind up dealing with the kids. Good ones, bad ones, and everything in between. Men seldom get stuck, and as Bob and friends frequently remind us, the "cum and run" tendencies of some of our fellow men lead to great pressure on the welfare state, not to mention what it does to crime rates.
If we are to further our? shared interests in limiting (or, fuck, why not dream - eliminating) the welfare state and maybe do something about crime, seems to me we should apply at least as much pressure on dead beat baby daddies as we do on girls to remain chaste or use reliable birth control.
Boys, you gotta have some skin in the game besides the skin you have in the game. Do we, then, go after dead beat dads with full abandon and squeeze those reckless welfare-making mother fuckers to the bone until they at least financially support their kids? Or, instead, do we take a pure liberty approach and say to unwed and poor pregos, "hey, you could have kept your pants on."????
Interested in Mike's, Sleddy's and Roadtrip's take, and that of the others who have the right point of view on this issue. Not so much interested in the views of the morally compromised, like Preston and Fire Marshall. Still praying for Race.
Although, and this will require some thought, with my new stance of zero tolerance for infringing on the inalienable rights of an innocent person, we have to think long and hard about the inherent tensions between true liberty and holding to account the cum dumpers themselves.
As a practical matter of gender roles, with which I agree btw, women wind up dealing with the kids. Good ones, bad ones, and everything in between. Men seldom get stuck, and as Bob and friends frequently remind us, the "cum and run" tendencies of some of our fellow men lead to great pressure on the welfare state, not to mention what it does to crime rates.
If we are to further our? shared interests in limiting (or, fuck, why not dream - eliminating) the welfare state and maybe do something about crime, seems to me we should apply at least as much pressure on dead beat baby daddies as we do on girls to remain chaste or use reliable birth control.
Boys, you gotta have some skin in the game besides the skin you have in the game. Do we, then, go after dead beat dads with full abandon and squeeze those reckless welfare-making mother fuckers to the bone until they at least financially support their kids? Or, instead, do we take a pure liberty approach and say to unwed and poor pregos, "hey, you could have kept your pants on."????
Interested in Mike's, Sleddy's and Roadtrip's take, and that of the others who have the right point of view on this issue. Not so much interested in the views of the morally compromised, like Preston and Fire Marshall. Still praying for Race.
I get tired of the media fueled abortion debate but how is limiting it to the first 20 weeks unreasonable?
It’s unreasonable because the life of a 19 week old person is at least as morally significant as yours is you dumb box of rocks.
Hope that was helpful.
You're unhinged. Again. Probably butt hurt because I didn't go to your wine and cheese bored after you begged me. Fuck off faggot.
Noted Baby Killer heard from.
The very idea that you think I actually wanted a retard like you swapping IQs with some of our finest thinkers here is Exhibit A-10,000 of your retardation.
If I asked you to join, and I don’t recall doing so, it was for traffic numbers and that is it. You’ve always struck me as quite poor anyway, so what could you have added other than how to scam welfare and social security bennies? Answer: nada. That’s Spanish for “nothing” you undereducated cretin.
You must have "convenient" amnesia.
Yeah, finest thinkers...like the crypto scam guys? LOL. I'll pass pal. I don't even get why you're here so much. My guess is it's to stroke your fragile ego. Go to a Hurricane bored.
Yeah, the poor thing. Nice try. I've dealt with other prick ambulance chasers like you on the boards. Most of you are the same
Although, and this will require some thought, with my new stance of zero tolerance for infringing on the inalienable rights of an innocent person, we have to think long and hard about the inherent tensions between true liberty and holding to account the cum dumpers themselves.
As a practical matter of gender roles, with which I agree btw, women wind up dealing with the kids. Good ones, bad ones, and everything in between. Men seldom get stuck, and as Bob and friends frequently remind us, the "cum and run" tendencies of some of our fellow men lead to great pressure on the welfare state, not to mention what it does to crime rates.
If we are to further our? shared interests in limiting (or, fuck, why not dream - eliminating) the welfare state and maybe do something about crime, seems to me we should apply at least as much pressure on dead beat baby daddies as we do on girls to remain chaste or use reliable birth control.
Boys, you gotta have some skin in the game besides the skin you have in the game. Do we, then, go after dead beat dads with full abandon and squeeze those reckless welfare-making mother fuckers to the bone until they at least financially support their kids? Or, instead, do we take a pure liberty approach and say to unwed and poor pregos, "hey, you could have kept your pants on."????
Interested in Mike's, Sleddy's and Roadtrip's take, and that of the others who have the right point of view on this issue. Not so much interested in the views of the morally compromised, like Preston and Fire Marshall. Still praying for Race.
Sounds kinda racist.gif
Hey, don't lay that shit in my lap. My proposed policy would apply to all who cum and run, with equal force.
Although, and this will require some thought, with my new stance of zero tolerance for infringing on the inalienable rights of an innocent person, we have to think long and hard about the inherent tensions between true liberty and holding to account the cum dumpers themselves.
As a practical matter of gender roles, with which I agree btw, women wind up dealing with the kids. Good ones, bad ones, and everything in between. Men seldom get stuck, and as Bob and friends frequently remind us, the "cum and run" tendencies of some of our fellow men lead to great pressure on the welfare state, not to mention what it does to crime rates.
If we are to further our? shared interests in limiting (or, fuck, why not dream - eliminating) the welfare state and maybe do something about crime, seems to me we should apply at least as much pressure on dead beat baby daddies as we do on girls to remain chaste or use reliable birth control.
Boys, you gotta have some skin in the game besides the skin you have in the game. Do we, then, go after dead beat dads with full abandon and squeeze those reckless welfare-making mother fuckers to the bone until they at least financially support their kids? Or, instead, do we take a pure liberty approach and say to unwed and poor pregos, "hey, you could have kept your pants on."????
Interested in Mike's, Sleddy's and Roadtrip's take, and that of the others who have the right point of view on this issue. Not so much interested in the views of the morally compromised, like Preston and Fire Marshall. Still praying for Race.
In no way, shape, or form, should the State be involved to influence a doctor-patient consult or a subsequent medical procedure. Not for physician assisted euthanasia; not for an abortion; not for a fucking jab.
It's a principled position for individual sovereignty and ultimately a free society. Almost like attorney-client privilege.
I get tired of the media fueled abortion debate but how is limiting it to the first 20 weeks unreasonable?
It’s unreasonable because the life of a 19 week old person is at least as morally significant as yours is you dumb box of rocks.
Hope that was helpful.
You're unhinged. Again. Probably butt hurt because I didn't go to your wine and cheese bored after you begged me. Fuck off faggot.
Noted Baby Killer heard from.
The very idea that you think I actually wanted a retard like you swapping IQs with some of our finest thinkers here is Exhibit A-10,000 of your retardation.
If I asked you to join, and I don’t recall doing so, it was for traffic numbers and that is it. You’ve always struck me as quite poor anyway, so what could you have added other than how to scam welfare and social security bennies? Answer: nada. That’s Spanish for “nothing” you undereducated cretin.
You must have "convenient" amnesia.
Yeah, finest thinkers...like the crypto scam guys? LOL. I'll pass pal. I don't even get why you're here so much. My guess is it's to stroke your fragile ego. Go to a Hurricane bored.
Yeah, the poor thing. Nice try. I've dealt with other prick ambulance chasers like you on the boards. Most of you are the same
I'm not your pal, Cletus. Sorry you don't "get" it; seems to be a frequent state of consciousness for you.
Comments
Hope that was helpful.
This is why!
One thing the renewal of Roe has done is ferret out the real conservatives from the fake ones. I always knew Race's dirty hippy past had to have done some damage and was lurking around in there somewhere; but he's a complicated man from the BHL triangle of tuffness, and as a member of the correct and righteous sect of Christianity, we? forgive him for his tolerances on this issue.
But finding some cracks in the Oregon bros has been enlightening. OTOH, having the Fire Marshall admit online that he's down with killing babies "up to a certain point" was hardly surprising.
Sleddy and I are praying for you guys.
Most of them know it's nonsense but go along as to not offend the mentally ill
The very idea that you think I actually wanted a retard like you swapping IQs with some of our finest thinkers here is Exhibit A-10,000 of your retardation.
If I asked you to join, and I don’t recall doing so, it was for traffic numbers and that is it. You’ve always struck me as quite poor anyway, so what could you have added other than how to scam welfare and social security bennies? Answer: nada. That’s Spanish for “nothing” you undereducated cretin.
As a practical matter of gender roles, with which I agree btw, women wind up dealing with the kids. Good ones, bad ones, and everything in between. Men seldom get stuck, and as Bob and friends frequently remind us, the "cum and run" tendencies of some of our fellow men lead to great pressure on the welfare state, not to mention what it does to crime rates.
If we are to further our? shared interests in limiting (or, fuck, why not dream - eliminating) the welfare state and maybe do something about crime, seems to me we should apply at least as much pressure on dead beat baby daddies as we do on girls to remain chaste or use reliable birth control.
Boys, you gotta have some skin in the game besides the skin you have in the game. Do we, then, go after dead beat dads with full abandon and squeeze those reckless welfare-making mother fuckers to the bone until they at least financially support their kids? Or, instead, do we take a pure liberty approach and say to unwed and poor pregos, "hey, you could have kept your pants on."????
Interested in Mike's, Sleddy's and Roadtrip's take, and that of the others who have the right point of view on this issue. Not so much interested in the views of the morally compromised, like Preston and Fire Marshall. Still praying for Race.
Yeah, finest thinkers...like the crypto scam guys? LOL. I'll pass pal. I don't even get why you're here so much. My guess is it's to stroke your fragile ego. Go to a Hurricane bored.
Yeah, the poor thing. Nice try. I've dealt with other prick ambulance chasers like you on the boards. Most of you are the same
In no way, shape, or form, should the State be involved to influence a doctor-patient consult or a subsequent medical procedure. Not for physician assisted euthanasia; not for an abortion; not for a fucking jab.
It's a principled position for individual sovereignty and ultimately a free society. Almost like attorney-client privilege.
An unfortunate necessity to be sure.
And don't tell me what to do, baby killer.