Thomas and his wife
Its as if rats forgot about The Bitch's loss back in 2016, where all we heard from the candidate herself was that it was a stolen election, that Trump was colluding. Then we had to endure 4 years of rats trying to take away my vote by trying to impeach based on a lie that was actually ginned up by The Bitch herself.
In reading this article there is a quote from Clarence Thomas that just hit it right on the head:
In the documentary “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words,” Justice Thomas described a realization about who was blocking the entrance to the Supreme Court building just as they’d once stood in the Little Rock schoolhouse doors. “I felt as though in my life I had been looking at the wrong people as the people who would be problematic toward me.”
“We were told that, ‘Oh, it’s gonna be the bigot in the pickup truck; it’s gonna be the Klansmen; it’s gonna be the rural sheriff.’ But it turned out that through all of that, ultimately the biggest impediment was the modern-day liberal.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/31/democrats-want-ginni-thomas-to-stay-home-and-bake-/
The racist shit Thomas and his wife have had to put up with from liberals is off the charts. The death threats, calling him an Uncle Tom, etc, etc. All liberal bullshit. The real racists.
Comments
-
It's disgusting... but since he is an uncle Tom which in itself is very fucking racist, it's ok. Fuck the leftBendintheriver said:The latest smear job by the left includes Justice Thomas and his wife. She is evidently not supposed to have her own opinions or so liberals believe. Clearly no one but a liberal is supposed to have an opinion, but that is not the focus here.
Its as if rats forgot about The Bitch's loss back in 2016, where all we heard from the candidate herself was that it was a stolen election, that Trump was colluding. Then we had to endure 4 years of rats trying to take away my vote by trying to impeach based on a lie that was actually ginned up by The Bitch herself.
In reading this article there is a quote from Clarence Thomas that just hit it right on the head:
In the documentary “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words,” Justice Thomas described a realization about who was blocking the entrance to the Supreme Court building just as they’d once stood in the Little Rock schoolhouse doors. “I felt as though in my life I had been looking at the wrong people as the people who would be problematic toward me.”
“We were told that, ‘Oh, it’s gonna be the bigot in the pickup truck; it’s gonna be the Klansmen; it’s gonna be the rural sheriff.’ But it turned out that through all of that, ultimately the biggest impediment was the modern-day liberal.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/31/democrats-want-ginni-thomas-to-stay-home-and-bake-/
The racist shit Thomas and his wife have had to put up with from liberals is off the charts. The death threats, calling him an Uncle Tom, etc, etc. All liberal bullshit. The real racists. -
She is married to Thomas so he’s not allowed to rule on anything because she has a different opinion than they like.
Hunter sold his soul to all sorts of horrible people, broke all sorts of laws, and kept “10% for the big guy”…but he’s not Joe so anything he did doesn’t matter and you can’t talk about him.
Same people… -
The same just happened on a local level. Longtime County prosecutor whose wife is out there in her online personna and facebook comments. Not in a good way either. His stance is she has her view, he has his own. They don't share a brain.
He's pretty well fucked with regards to re-election even though he's done a pretty solid job.
-
Anything to avoid the point, eh Atl?
Lone justice to take the position that communications (which included his wife's) shouldn't be provided to the Jan. 6 committee.
Didn't recuse himself.
Corrupt as fuck -
Suddenly HH sees some sort of moral dilemma? Twisted and evil of course. Because it's a black man married to a white woman and he thinks she runs him because she's white and he's too stupid to know it because he's black. Racist much? Does your husband tell you what to think?HHusky said:Anything to avoid the point, eh Atl?
Lone justice to take the position that communications (which included his wife's) shouldn't be provided to the Jan. 6 committee.
Didn't recuse himself.
Corrupt as fuck -
Why don't you provide proof or shut the fuck up?HHusky said:Anything to avoid the point, eh Atl?
Lone justice to take the position that communications (which included his wife's) shouldn't be provided to the Jan. 6 committee.
Didn't recuse himself.
Corrupt as fuck
No need to investigate until you come up with proof - H yesterday -
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/03/25/nation/read-texts-virginia-thomas-reportedly-sent-mark-meadows/RaceBannon said:
Why don't you provide proof or shut the fuck up?HHusky said:Anything to avoid the point, eh Atl?
Lone justice to take the position that communications (which included his wife's) shouldn't be provided to the Jan. 6 committee.
Didn't recuse himself.
Corrupt as fuck
No need to investigate until you come up with proof - H yesterday
https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-wife-texts-spark-calls-probe-jan-6-case-handling-1694423
Perhaps you missed it because it wasn't covered by Stormfront. -
I don't see any proof of anything here
At all
Hunter's emails weren't proof why would a text be?
Get us those canceled checks and we can investigate.
Or STFU -
Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
-
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment. -
Black people are about to be overrepresented anyway
-
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment. -
So no link then
-
'Lone' justice?HHusky said:Anything to avoid the point, eh Atl?
Lone justice to take the position that communications (which included his wife's) shouldn't be provided to the Jan. 6 committee.
Didn't recuse himself.
Corrupt as fuck
A 'Token' Justice.
Your racism knows no bounds, counselor.
-
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
-
They can't kick a black person off. Then again straight black men are the white people of black people46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment. -
Still no proof thenHHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
Or a link -
Did the text messages get turned over?HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical. -
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical. -
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference.
-
But what if I don't give a shit and just dislike you and your ilk enough that I'll let it slide?HHusky said:
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference. -
Then I salute you as the one honest dumbfuck TugCon!Pitchfork51 said:
But what if I don't give a shit and just dislike you and your ilk enough that I'll let it slide?HHusky said:
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference.
Bravo! -
So still waiting for proof madam
-
You can't imagine "honest" so don't talk about it.HHusky said:
Then I salute you as the one honest dumbfuck TugCon!Pitchfork51 said:
But what if I don't give a shit and just dislike you and your ilk enough that I'll let it slide?HHusky said:
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference.
Bravo! -
So the texts were never turned over?HHusky said:
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference. -
Fuck off Hypocrite. Your spinning is BS.HHusky said:
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference. -
Spokane DA right?PurpleThrobber said:The same just happened on a local level. Longtime County prosecutor whose wife is out there in her online personna and facebook comments. Not in a good way either. His stance is she has her view, he has his own. They don't share a brain.
He's pretty well fucked with regards to re-election even though he's done a pretty solid job. -
It's what happened in 2020HHusky said:
Then I salute you as the one honest dumbfuck TugCon!Pitchfork51 said:
But what if I don't give a shit and just dislike you and your ilk enough that I'll let it slide?HHusky said:
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference.
Bravo!
Trump was so bad it didn't matter what we had to do
This time
Just this once! -
If we just had some good ol patriarchy, Clarence could have told the missus her thoughts and this sordid affair would have been avoided.
-
Pretty sure Uncle Tom still had to do what Miss Eva told him to do.GrundleStiltzkin said:If we just had some good ol patriarchy, Clarence could have told the missus her thoughts and this sordid affair would have been avoided.
