Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Thomas and his wife
Bendintheriver
Member Posts: 6,928
in Tug Tavern
The latest smear job by the left includes Justice Thomas and his wife. She is evidently not supposed to have her own opinions or so liberals believe. Clearly no one but a liberal is supposed to have an opinion, but that is not the focus here.
Its as if rats forgot about The Bitch's loss back in 2016, where all we heard from the candidate herself was that it was a stolen election, that Trump was colluding. Then we had to endure 4 years of rats trying to take away my vote by trying to impeach based on a lie that was actually ginned up by The Bitch herself.
In reading this article there is a quote from Clarence Thomas that just hit it right on the head:
In the documentary “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words,” Justice Thomas described a realization about who was blocking the entrance to the Supreme Court building just as they’d once stood in the Little Rock schoolhouse doors. “I felt as though in my life I had been looking at the wrong people as the people who would be problematic toward me.”
“We were told that, ‘Oh, it’s gonna be the bigot in the pickup truck; it’s gonna be the Klansmen; it’s gonna be the rural sheriff.’ But it turned out that through all of that, ultimately the biggest impediment was the modern-day liberal.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/31/democrats-want-ginni-thomas-to-stay-home-and-bake-/
The racist shit Thomas and his wife have had to put up with from liberals is off the charts. The death threats, calling him an Uncle Tom, etc, etc. All liberal bullshit. The real racists.
Its as if rats forgot about The Bitch's loss back in 2016, where all we heard from the candidate herself was that it was a stolen election, that Trump was colluding. Then we had to endure 4 years of rats trying to take away my vote by trying to impeach based on a lie that was actually ginned up by The Bitch herself.
In reading this article there is a quote from Clarence Thomas that just hit it right on the head:
In the documentary “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words,” Justice Thomas described a realization about who was blocking the entrance to the Supreme Court building just as they’d once stood in the Little Rock schoolhouse doors. “I felt as though in my life I had been looking at the wrong people as the people who would be problematic toward me.”
“We were told that, ‘Oh, it’s gonna be the bigot in the pickup truck; it’s gonna be the Klansmen; it’s gonna be the rural sheriff.’ But it turned out that through all of that, ultimately the biggest impediment was the modern-day liberal.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/31/democrats-want-ginni-thomas-to-stay-home-and-bake-/
The racist shit Thomas and his wife have had to put up with from liberals is off the charts. The death threats, calling him an Uncle Tom, etc, etc. All liberal bullshit. The real racists.
Comments
Hunter sold his soul to all sorts of horrible people, broke all sorts of laws, and kept “10% for the big guy”…but he’s not Joe so anything he did doesn’t matter and you can’t talk about him.
Same people…
He's pretty well fucked with regards to re-election even though he's done a pretty solid job.
Lone justice to take the position that communications (which included his wife's) shouldn't be provided to the Jan. 6 committee.
Didn't recuse himself.
Corrupt as fuck
No need to investigate until you come up with proof - H yesterday
https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-wife-texts-spark-calls-probe-jan-6-case-handling-1694423
Perhaps you missed it because it wasn't covered by Stormfront.
At all
Hunter's emails weren't proof why would a text be?
Get us those canceled checks and we can investigate.
Or STFU
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
A 'Token' Justice.
Your racism knows no bounds, counselor.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
Or a link
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference.