Thomas and his wife
Comments
-
Black people are about to be overrepresented anyway
-
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment. -
So no link then
-
'Lone' justice?HHusky said:Anything to avoid the point, eh Atl?
Lone justice to take the position that communications (which included his wife's) shouldn't be provided to the Jan. 6 committee.
Didn't recuse himself.
Corrupt as fuck
A 'Token' Justice.
Your racism knows no bounds, counselor.
-
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
-
They can't kick a black person off. Then again straight black men are the white people of black people46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment. -
Still no proof thenHHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
Or a link -
Did the text messages get turned over?HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical. -
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical. -
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference.
