Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Thomas and his wife
Comments
-
You can never hear sordid too much.GrundleStiltzkin said:If we just had some good ol patriarchy, Clarence could have told the missus her thoughts and this sordid affair would have been avoided.
-
Keep waiting, BorisRaceBannon said:So still waiting for proof madam
-
Why am I reading these text messages that CT supposedly withheld Dazzler?
-
Imagine being against free speech.RaceBannon said:So still waiting for proof madam
-
What part of "lone justice to oppose" made you think CT prevailed?SFGbob said:Why am I reading these text messages that CT supposedly withheld Dazzler?
Don't embarrass the other retards, blob. -
So still no proof then lady
-
Only racist dog whistles.RaceBannon said:So still no proof then lady
If he does it long enough, Kobe will chime in. Cook it.
-
And the insurrection was unsuccessful, so it doesn't matter.SFGbob said:
And Mike Pence wasn't hanged. -
That really means a lot coming from a dishonest dumbfuck, Mr. Hands Up, Don’t Shoot!HHusky said:
Then I salute you as the one honest dumbfuck TugCon!Pitchfork51 said:
But what if I don't give a shit and just dislike you and your ilk enough that I'll let it slide?HHusky said:
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.46XiJCAB said:
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.HHusky said:
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?46XiJCAB said:
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.HHusky said:
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.46XiJCAB said:Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference.
Bravo!
