Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich denied bail
Comments
-
Democrats will democrat. BTW Tammany Hall were democrats. CRT doesn't really teach that
In Tammany New York, votes were acquired through social contact and practical favors, financial and legal assistance, jobs and drinks at the pub. The direct financial beneficiaries were, yes, the politicians and the businessmen who got contracts at far above the market price—-but also the poor families whose rent got paid, the boy who got a job working for the new El being put up along Greenwich Street and 9th Avenue, the couple whose hotel room was paid for when they were burnt out of their apartment. In less cynical terms: Tammany was a corruption, but it was a corruption of something good: the idea that government should, as Plunkitt said, be “warm and personal;” that decisions should be made locally; that rulers should directly and practically help the ruled; that there should be an everyday and immediate connection between the politicians and the people -
When we're corrupt it's good - democrats
-
https://www.americanheritage.com/battle-athens
Keep up the election theft. The greatest generation fixed it in some places. Citizens with guns worked quite well here. -
If anything, the law in Georgia is specific to not allow for weasel words. "Well, you didn't say we couldn't pass out water! So we're passing out water and wearing these shirts that just have our candidate's name on it"
You'd think lawyers would be able to pick up on things like that. -
https://internauta-online.com/2014/06/theodore-roosevelt-how-we-overthrew-corrupt-tammany-hall/RaceBannon said:Democrats will democrat. BTW Tammany Hall were democrats. CRT doesn't really teach that
In Tammany New York, votes were acquired through social contact and practical favors, financial and legal assistance, jobs and drinks at the pub. The direct financial beneficiaries were, yes, the politicians and the businessmen who got contracts at far above the market price—-but also the poor families whose rent got paid, the boy who got a job working for the new El being put up along Greenwich Street and 9th Avenue, the couple whose hotel room was paid for when they were burnt out of their apartment. In less cynical terms: Tammany was a corruption, but it was a corruption of something good: the idea that government should, as Plunkitt said, be “warm and personal;” that decisions should be made locally; that rulers should directly and practically help the ruled; that there should be an everyday and immediate connection between the politicians and the people
History repeating itself. Police doing the government's bidding, corrupt politicians, newspapers running cover.
No wonder the Dems yanked down TR's statue.
-
Delaware has stricter voting laws than Georgia. Must be like Jim Crow 2.0 on steroids.hardhat said:
Stacey Abrams did have lots to say about Georgia voting laws, so she's quite relevant. Did you think that was dunking on me?
It says what it says...which is what? Are these Jim Crow 2.0 laws, as you say? And I am serious, if these laws are as nefarious as you say, it would seem that no black people were able to vote, and republicans won.
Or...what are you saying exactly?
Here is what I am saying: Democrats and their media buddies severely distorted the laws and made them sound so evil that it's laughable. You *seem* to be parroting that nonsense. Maybe you are not. I am saying that blue states have similar laws. All states have some laws about voting that could be deemed as *restrictive* if CNN wants to write about it. I also note that not all politicians in Georgia are white, and that the laws had to pass through at least some non white scrutiny. So there's that. And I don't live there, so maybe I'm missing something. And is it just about 'passing out water'? Yes, the heat is sweltering in November and people have to stand in line for 8 hours. C'mon man.
What is that you are saying? -
I simply tried to engage.WestlinnDuck said:
Delaware has stricter voting laws than Georgia. Must be like Jim Crow 2.0 on steroids. -
No, you don't answer questions. That's because you're a shitty human being. You'd cut off a limb rather than answer a simple Y/N question. Clown.HHusky said: -
Can you imagine being a client of our hypothetical lawyer and asking him for his opinion on your legal case and then expecting an honest and accurate answer?46XiJCAB said:
No, you don't answer questions. That's because you're a shitty human being. You'd cut off a limb rather than answer a simple Y/N question. Clown. -
Almost like asking the Devil if hell is hot? "Well that depends on what hot means to you". This would be the typical Dazzler response. Yes or No answers require you take ownership.WestlinnDuck said:
Can you imagine being a client of our hypothetical lawyer and asking him for his opinion on your legal case and then expecting an honest and accurate answer? -
-
More proof, as if more was needed, that Race misses the 19th Century.RaceBannon said:Democrats will democrat. BTW Tammany Hall were democrats. CRT doesn't really teach that
In Tammany New York, votes were acquired through social contact and practical favors, financial and legal assistance, jobs and drinks at the pub. The direct financial beneficiaries were, yes, the politicians and the businessmen who got contracts at far above the market price—-but also the poor families whose rent got paid, the boy who got a job working for the new El being put up along Greenwich Street and 9th Avenue, the couple whose hotel room was paid for when they were burnt out of their apartment. In less cynical terms: Tammany was a corruption, but it was a corruption of something good: the idea that government should, as Plunkitt said, be “warm and personal;” that decisions should be made locally; that rulers should directly and practically help the ruled; that there should be an everyday and immediate connection between the politicians and the people -
Dodge and deflect
I don't need to miss the 19th century when it was here in 2020 -
Remember all the posts from the dazzler stressing the need for clean voting rolls, votes only by US citizens and by actual state residents and an auditable trail and clean internal controls? Me neither. But why would someone that has a mythical MBA be concerned with internal controls?RaceBannon said:Dodge and deflect
I don't need to miss the 19th century when it was here in 2020 -
There are all sorts of internal checks.WestlinnDuck said:
Remember all the posts from the dazzler stressing the need for clean voting rolls, votes only by US citizens and by actual state residents and an auditable trail and clean internal controls? Me neither. But why would someone that has a mythical MBA be concerned with internal controls?
That's why they were able to catch all those Republicans who voted for Daddy twice. -
All sorts of internal checks? Like asking for proof of citizenship to register to vote? Those kind of internal checks? Or mandatory cleaning of voter rolls for dead voters and voters registered in multiple states? Or requiring proof of identity on mail in votes like signature checks? Geezus you suck at this. Leftards lie and love to be lied to.
-
Identify for us the "internal checks" here in California that keeps non-citizens from voting Dazzler. We've done this dance before, it ends badly for you.HHusky said:
There are all sorts of internal checks.
That's why they were able to catch all those Republicans who voted for Daddy twice. -
Voter rolls are cleaned up periodically, but they'll never be perfectly accurate.WestlinnDuck said:All sorts of internal checks? Like asking for proof of citizenship to register to vote? Those kind of internal checks? Or mandatory cleaning of voter rolls for dead voters and voters registered in multiple states? Or requiring proof of identity on mail in votes like signature checks? Geezus you suck at this. Leftards lie and love to be lied to.
I've got a kid registered to vote here and in California. So it would be possible for her to vote twice. But like 99.9999% of the population registered in two states, she doesn't.
This is a crime that isn't being committed, but you girls want to disenfranchise people because it's possible for someone to commit it.
My ballot gets signature checked, btw. Doesn't yours? -
They check a box. The internal check is that everyone is honest and never cheats. Trust is the internal check. When I say mythical MBA, this is the proof. The dazzler wouldn't know an internal control if it hit him in the head.SFGbob said:
Identify for us the "internal checks" here in California that keeps non-citizens from voting Dazzler. We've done this dance before, it ends badly for you.
-
And how do you know non-citizens aren't voting here in California Dazzler? Do they ever clean up the voter rolls by checking it against citizenship status Dazzler? And why was the party you vote for so opposed to do that?HHusky said:
Voter rolls are cleaned up periodically, but they'll never be perfectly accurate.
I've got a kid registered to vote here and in California. So it would be possible for her to vote twice. But like 99.9999% of the population registered in two states, she doesn't.
This is a crime that isn't being committed, but you girls want to disenfranchise people because it's possible for someone to commit it.
My ballot gets signature checked, btw. Doesn't yours? -
Lying liars lie.HHusky said:
Voter rolls are cleaned up periodically, but they'll never be perfectly accurate.
I've got a kid registered to vote here and in California. So it would be possible for her to vote twice. But like 99.9999% of the population registered in two states, she doesn't.
This is a crime that isn't being committed, but you girls want to disenfranchise people because it's possible for someone to commit it.
My ballot gets signature checked, btw. Doesn't yours? -
Non-citizen immigrants to the US aren't all that eager to commit a pointless felony here. You girls love to talk about voter registration, you don't really want to talk about the number of times your fever dreams were actually realized by someone casting a ballot.WestlinnDuck said:
They check a box. The internal check is that everyone is honest and never cheats. Trust is the internal check. When I say mythical MBA, this is the proof. The dazzler wouldn't know an internal control if it hit him in the head. -
Cause Cali is on it! Dazzler.
-
Jack Handy? That you?46XiJCAB said:
Lying liars lie. -
How many non-citizens have been charged with voting in Cali? If you don't look for it, you won't find it. And if you don't have a data base of actual US citizens, then you can't find them. I know how anxious you are to have an actual citizen data base or have ICE distribute a list of illegal aliens that have been released to the states. I hear Newsom calling for that almost every day.HHusky said:
Non-citizen immigrants to the US aren't all that eager to commit a pointless felony here. You girls love to talk about voter registration, you don't really want to talk about the number of times your fever dreams were actually realized by someone casting a ballot.
Once again, trust isn't an internal control. -
But Cali is all over it.HHusky said:
Jack Handy? That you? -
Yep, the "internal control" is the honor system. We trust that when a person says they're a legal US citizen and signs the little card attesting to that, then they are telling the truth. That's it.WestlinnDuck said:
They check a box. The internal check is that everyone is honest and never cheats. Trust is the internal check. When I say mythical MBA, this is the proof. The dazzler wouldn't know an internal control if it hit him in the head. -
Few have been charged because nobody ever does it. Those "internal controls" are just too stringentWestlinnDuck said:
How many non-citizens have been charged with voting in Cali? If you don't look for it, you won't find it. And if you don't have a data base of actual US citizens, then you can't find them. I know how anxious you are to have an actual citizen data base or have ICE distribute a list of illegal aliens that have been released to the states. I hear Newsom calling for that almost every day.
Once again, trust isn't an internal control. -
In other words, you imagine it happens all the time.SFGbob said:
Few have been charged because nobody ever does it. Those "internal controls" are just too stringent -
So you would have been cool with freezing assets of protestors during the Summer of 20'? Didn't think so...schmuckTheKobeStopper said:I’m just hear to point out that the Trumpers constantly say shit like “it’s the law” to affirm their positions. It’s very funny how, when it’s inconvenient for them, somethings status as a law becomes irrelevant.
