Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich denied bail
Comments
-
-
More proof, as if more was needed, that Race misses the 19th Century.RaceBannon said:Democrats will democrat. BTW Tammany Hall were democrats. CRT doesn't really teach that
In Tammany New York, votes were acquired through social contact and practical favors, financial and legal assistance, jobs and drinks at the pub. The direct financial beneficiaries were, yes, the politicians and the businessmen who got contracts at far above the market price—-but also the poor families whose rent got paid, the boy who got a job working for the new El being put up along Greenwich Street and 9th Avenue, the couple whose hotel room was paid for when they were burnt out of their apartment. In less cynical terms: Tammany was a corruption, but it was a corruption of something good: the idea that government should, as Plunkitt said, be “warm and personal;” that decisions should be made locally; that rulers should directly and practically help the ruled; that there should be an everyday and immediate connection between the politicians and the people -
Dodge and deflect
I don't need to miss the 19th century when it was here in 2020 -
Remember all the posts from the dazzler stressing the need for clean voting rolls, votes only by US citizens and by actual state residents and an auditable trail and clean internal controls? Me neither. But why would someone that has a mythical MBA be concerned with internal controls?RaceBannon said:Dodge and deflect
I don't need to miss the 19th century when it was here in 2020 -
There are all sorts of internal checks.WestlinnDuck said:
Remember all the posts from the dazzler stressing the need for clean voting rolls, votes only by US citizens and by actual state residents and an auditable trail and clean internal controls? Me neither. But why would someone that has a mythical MBA be concerned with internal controls?RaceBannon said:Dodge and deflect
I don't need to miss the 19th century when it was here in 2020
That's why they were able to catch all those Republicans who voted for Daddy twice. -
All sorts of internal checks? Like asking for proof of citizenship to register to vote? Those kind of internal checks? Or mandatory cleaning of voter rolls for dead voters and voters registered in multiple states? Or requiring proof of identity on mail in votes like signature checks? Geezus you suck at this. Leftards lie and love to be lied to.
-
Identify for us the "internal checks" here in California that keeps non-citizens from voting Dazzler. We've done this dance before, it ends badly for you.HHusky said:
There are all sorts of internal checks.WestlinnDuck said:
Remember all the posts from the dazzler stressing the need for clean voting rolls, votes only by US citizens and by actual state residents and an auditable trail and clean internal controls? Me neither. But why would someone that has a mythical MBA be concerned with internal controls?RaceBannon said:Dodge and deflect
I don't need to miss the 19th century when it was here in 2020
That's why they were able to catch all those Republicans who voted for Daddy twice. -
Voter rolls are cleaned up periodically, but they'll never be perfectly accurate.WestlinnDuck said:All sorts of internal checks? Like asking for proof of citizenship to register to vote? Those kind of internal checks? Or mandatory cleaning of voter rolls for dead voters and voters registered in multiple states? Or requiring proof of identity on mail in votes like signature checks? Geezus you suck at this. Leftards lie and love to be lied to.
I've got a kid registered to vote here and in California. So it would be possible for her to vote twice. But like 99.9999% of the population registered in two states, she doesn't.
This is a crime that isn't being committed, but you girls want to disenfranchise people because it's possible for someone to commit it.
My ballot gets signature checked, btw. Doesn't yours? -
They check a box. The internal check is that everyone is honest and never cheats. Trust is the internal check. When I say mythical MBA, this is the proof. The dazzler wouldn't know an internal control if it hit him in the head.SFGbob said:
Identify for us the "internal checks" here in California that keeps non-citizens from voting Dazzler. We've done this dance before, it ends badly for you.HHusky said:
There are all sorts of internal checks.WestlinnDuck said:
Remember all the posts from the dazzler stressing the need for clean voting rolls, votes only by US citizens and by actual state residents and an auditable trail and clean internal controls? Me neither. But why would someone that has a mythical MBA be concerned with internal controls?RaceBannon said:Dodge and deflect
I don't need to miss the 19th century when it was here in 2020
That's why they were able to catch all those Republicans who voted for Daddy twice.
-
And how do you know non-citizens aren't voting here in California Dazzler? Do they ever clean up the voter rolls by checking it against citizenship status Dazzler? And why was the party you vote for so opposed to do that?HHusky said:
Voter rolls are cleaned up periodically, but they'll never be perfectly accurate.WestlinnDuck said:All sorts of internal checks? Like asking for proof of citizenship to register to vote? Those kind of internal checks? Or mandatory cleaning of voter rolls for dead voters and voters registered in multiple states? Or requiring proof of identity on mail in votes like signature checks? Geezus you suck at this. Leftards lie and love to be lied to.
I've got a kid registered to vote here and in California. So it would be possible for her to vote twice. But like 99.9999% of the population registered in two states, she doesn't.
This is a crime that isn't being committed, but you girls want to disenfranchise people because it's possible for someone to commit it.
My ballot gets signature checked, btw. Doesn't yours?
