Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich denied bail
Comments
-
Democrats will democrat. BTW Tammany Hall were democrats. CRT doesn't really teach that
In Tammany New York, votes were acquired through social contact and practical favors, financial and legal assistance, jobs and drinks at the pub. The direct financial beneficiaries were, yes, the politicians and the businessmen who got contracts at far above the market price—-but also the poor families whose rent got paid, the boy who got a job working for the new El being put up along Greenwich Street and 9th Avenue, the couple whose hotel room was paid for when they were burnt out of their apartment. In less cynical terms: Tammany was a corruption, but it was a corruption of something good: the idea that government should, as Plunkitt said, be “warm and personal;” that decisions should be made locally; that rulers should directly and practically help the ruled; that there should be an everyday and immediate connection between the politicians and the people -
When we're corrupt it's good - democrats
-
https://www.americanheritage.com/battle-athens
Keep up the election theft. The greatest generation fixed it in some places. Citizens with guns worked quite well here. -
If anything, the law in Georgia is specific to not allow for weasel words. "Well, you didn't say we couldn't pass out water! So we're passing out water and wearing these shirts that just have our candidate's name on it"
You'd think lawyers would be able to pick up on things like that. -
https://internauta-online.com/2014/06/theodore-roosevelt-how-we-overthrew-corrupt-tammany-hall/RaceBannon said:Democrats will democrat. BTW Tammany Hall were democrats. CRT doesn't really teach that
In Tammany New York, votes were acquired through social contact and practical favors, financial and legal assistance, jobs and drinks at the pub. The direct financial beneficiaries were, yes, the politicians and the businessmen who got contracts at far above the market price—-but also the poor families whose rent got paid, the boy who got a job working for the new El being put up along Greenwich Street and 9th Avenue, the couple whose hotel room was paid for when they were burnt out of their apartment. In less cynical terms: Tammany was a corruption, but it was a corruption of something good: the idea that government should, as Plunkitt said, be “warm and personal;” that decisions should be made locally; that rulers should directly and practically help the ruled; that there should be an everyday and immediate connection between the politicians and the people
History repeating itself. Police doing the government's bidding, corrupt politicians, newspapers running cover.
No wonder the Dems yanked down TR's statue.
-
Delaware has stricter voting laws than Georgia. Must be like Jim Crow 2.0 on steroids.hardhat said:
Stacey Abrams did have lots to say about Georgia voting laws, so she's quite relevant. Did you think that was dunking on me?HHusky said:
You can’t be serious. The statute was amended. It says exactly what I said it says.hardhat said:If those rules in Georgia were so awful, why did Democrats win both the senate races? Why did Stacey Abrams avoid Biden when he came to Georgia to further distort the claims about the laws?
But Stacey Abrams!
It says what it says...which is what? Are these Jim Crow 2.0 laws, as you say? And I am serious, if these laws are as nefarious as you say, it would seem that no black people were able to vote, and republicans won.
Or...what are you saying exactly?
Here is what I am saying: Democrats and their media buddies severely distorted the laws and made them sound so evil that it's laughable. You *seem* to be parroting that nonsense. Maybe you are not. I am saying that blue states have similar laws. All states have some laws about voting that could be deemed as *restrictive* if CNN wants to write about it. I also note that not all politicians in Georgia are white, and that the laws had to pass through at least some non white scrutiny. So there's that. And I don't live there, so maybe I'm missing something. And is it just about 'passing out water'? Yes, the heat is sweltering in November and people have to stand in line for 8 hours. C'mon man.
What is that you are saying? -
I simply tried to engage.WestlinnDuck said:
Delaware has stricter voting laws than Georgia. Must be like Jim Crow 2.0 on steroids.hardhat said:
Stacey Abrams did have lots to say about Georgia voting laws, so she's quite relevant. Did you think that was dunking on me?HHusky said:
You can’t be serious. The statute was amended. It says exactly what I said it says.hardhat said:If those rules in Georgia were so awful, why did Democrats win both the senate races? Why did Stacey Abrams avoid Biden when he came to Georgia to further distort the claims about the laws?
But Stacey Abrams!
It says what it says...which is what? Are these Jim Crow 2.0 laws, as you say? And I am serious, if these laws are as nefarious as you say, it would seem that no black people were able to vote, and republicans won.
Or...what are you saying exactly?
Here is what I am saying: Democrats and their media buddies severely distorted the laws and made them sound so evil that it's laughable. You *seem* to be parroting that nonsense. Maybe you are not. I am saying that blue states have similar laws. All states have some laws about voting that could be deemed as *restrictive* if CNN wants to write about it. I also note that not all politicians in Georgia are white, and that the laws had to pass through at least some non white scrutiny. So there's that. And I don't live there, so maybe I'm missing something. And is it just about 'passing out water'? Yes, the heat is sweltering in November and people have to stand in line for 8 hours. C'mon man.
What is that you are saying? -
No, you don't answer questions. That's because you're a shitty human being. You'd cut off a limb rather than answer a simple Y/N question. Clown.HHusky said:
I simply answered a question.hardhat said:I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.
-
Can you imagine being a client of our hypothetical lawyer and asking him for his opinion on your legal case and then expecting an honest and accurate answer?46XiJCAB said:
No, you don't answer questions. That's because you're a shitty human being. You'd cut off a limb rather than answer a simple Y/N question. Clown.HHusky said:
I simply answered a question.hardhat said:I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.
-
Almost like asking the Devil if hell is hot? "Well that depends on what hot means to you". This would be the typical Dazzler response. Yes or No answers require you take ownership.WestlinnDuck said:
Can you imagine being a client of our hypothetical lawyer and asking him for his opinion on your legal case and then expecting an honest and accurate answer?46XiJCAB said:
No, you don't answer questions. That's because you're a shitty human being. You'd cut off a limb rather than answer a simple Y/N question. Clown.HHusky said:
I simply answered a question.hardhat said:I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.
