Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Libertarian Public Health
Comments
-
Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
What's your point other than the one on your head?
-
Apparently they die faster in the vast, maskless prairies these days.PurpleThrobber said:
Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
What's your point other than the one on your head? -
Because Cuomo murdered the GG/Boomers earlier this year.HHusky said:
Apparently they die faster in the vast, maskless prairies these days.PurpleThrobber said:
Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
What's your point other than the one on your head?
Maff.
-
186 > 161HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
Hmmmm . . . -
When is the running count of death from the seasonal flu going to start?HHusky said:
186 > 161HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
Hmmmm . . .
-
How did this turn out? Did everyone in North Dakota die?HHusky said: -
All deaths Joey’s fault since Jan. 2021. Those are the rules. Any other numbers you’d care to discuss Dazzler?
-
-
RaceBannon said:
Imagine being that pathetic of a person like H is
