Parker twins
Comments
-
Yup, Bidens leaking oil and trumps a totally insane cult leader. If that's the best we've got were all fucked. The easily led just can't see it yet. The two party system is spiraling into the ground.Tequilla said:
98% of the political takes that I make are focused on exposing hypocrisy and building awareness to those that are blind to having opinions based on anything other than whether it comes from the mouth of a D or Rsinceredawg said:
Teq was great back in pod days, but more recently he's spewing all these FoxNews/KGB talking points on Twitter so it's hard to respect him.JoeEDangerously said:
Anyone who values other peoples opinions. Teq is one of us. I don’t understand the vitriol some have for himSources said:
who exactly is your target audience here?Tequilla said:Interior prospects for sure ... not sure that I see anything resembling rare traits and the motors can be a tad more consistent at times in some of the video I watched. Definitely need some good S&C work and development. Probably shouldn't expect to see on the field before RS Soph levels in any kind of a rotation at best IMO. If they are playing earlier than that I might be concerned.
If you have an issue you can always ask for clarification or discuss …
I’ve been very consistent in saying that at least in my opinion getting vaccinated matters, that from the beginning we haven’t been measuring the right data (you can check the tug on that), and that there are slippery slopes to mandates.
I’ve also been very vocal on many of the decisions we’ve made the last 12 months being bad for inflation and being vocal from before the election that Joe Biden was not a good choice as President. I’ve also said that Trump was a worthless choice as well and that the election options we had in 2020 were pathetic.
Sure sounds like a bunch of conspiracy theories to me …
Now two things before you all jump on my shit:
1) I'm not a d or an r they are worthless. We need a 4 party system with liz, bernie and the progressives on the far looney left, old school D's and R's center left/right, and the trumps on the far batshit crazy right.
2) Here's a preemptive FUCKOFF for all the F-O's about to come my way.
Now back to our regular scheduled Dawg program. -
I have some very strong opinions on what you said here … some of it I’m not 100% sure I want to completely elaborate onDawgtillDeath said:
Yup, Bidens leaking oil and trumps a totally insane cult leader. If that's the best we've got were all fucked. The easily led just can't see it yet. The two party system is spiraling into the ground.Tequilla said:
98% of the political takes that I make are focused on exposing hypocrisy and building awareness to those that are blind to having opinions based on anything other than whether it comes from the mouth of a D or Rsinceredawg said:
Teq was great back in pod days, but more recently he's spewing all these FoxNews/KGB talking points on Twitter so it's hard to respect him.JoeEDangerously said:
Anyone who values other peoples opinions. Teq is one of us. I don’t understand the vitriol some have for himSources said:
who exactly is your target audience here?Tequilla said:Interior prospects for sure ... not sure that I see anything resembling rare traits and the motors can be a tad more consistent at times in some of the video I watched. Definitely need some good S&C work and development. Probably shouldn't expect to see on the field before RS Soph levels in any kind of a rotation at best IMO. If they are playing earlier than that I might be concerned.
If you have an issue you can always ask for clarification or discuss …
I’ve been very consistent in saying that at least in my opinion getting vaccinated matters, that from the beginning we haven’t been measuring the right data (you can check the tug on that), and that there are slippery slopes to mandates.
I’ve also been very vocal on many of the decisions we’ve made the last 12 months being bad for inflation and being vocal from before the election that Joe Biden was not a good choice as President. I’ve also said that Trump was a worthless choice as well and that the election options we had in 2020 were pathetic.
Sure sounds like a bunch of conspiracy theories to me …
Now two things before you all jump on my shit:
1) I'm not a d or an r they are worthless. We need a 4 party system with liz, bernie and the progressives on the far looney left, old school D's and R's center left/right, and the trumps on the far batshit crazy right.
2) Here's a preemptive FUCKOFF for all the F-O's about to come my way.
Now back to our regular scheduled Dawg program.
I need to think about if I want to publicly put out some of the info I’ve heard the last few hours and connecting the dots on what I think happened -
Some of you deserve to die
-
Just some?FireCohen said:Some of you deserve to die
-
I think you might be surprised how many Tug denizens hate the Uniparty completely. Ds and Rs. Mostly all shit. You are not alone.DawgtillDeath said:
Yup, Bidens leaking oil and trumps a totally insane cult leader. If that's the best we've got were all fucked. The easily led just can't see it yet. The two party system is spiraling into the ground.Tequilla said:
98% of the political takes that I make are focused on exposing hypocrisy and building awareness to those that are blind to having opinions based on anything other than whether it comes from the mouth of a D or Rsinceredawg said:
Teq was great back in pod days, but more recently he's spewing all these FoxNews/KGB talking points on Twitter so it's hard to respect him.JoeEDangerously said:
Anyone who values other peoples opinions. Teq is one of us. I don’t understand the vitriol some have for himSources said:
who exactly is your target audience here?Tequilla said:Interior prospects for sure ... not sure that I see anything resembling rare traits and the motors can be a tad more consistent at times in some of the video I watched. Definitely need some good S&C work and development. Probably shouldn't expect to see on the field before RS Soph levels in any kind of a rotation at best IMO. If they are playing earlier than that I might be concerned.
If you have an issue you can always ask for clarification or discuss …
I’ve been very consistent in saying that at least in my opinion getting vaccinated matters, that from the beginning we haven’t been measuring the right data (you can check the tug on that), and that there are slippery slopes to mandates.
I’ve also been very vocal on many of the decisions we’ve made the last 12 months being bad for inflation and being vocal from before the election that Joe Biden was not a good choice as President. I’ve also said that Trump was a worthless choice as well and that the election options we had in 2020 were pathetic.
Sure sounds like a bunch of conspiracy theories to me …
Now two things before you all jump on my shit:
1) I'm not a d or an r they are worthless. We need a 4 party system with liz, bernie and the progressives on the far looney left, old school D's and R's center left/right, and the trumps on the far batshit crazy right.
2) Here's a preemptive FUCKOFF for all the F-O's about to come my way.
Now back to our regular scheduled Dawg program. -
After the ups and downs of this thread I’ll go firstFireCohen said:Some of you deserve to die
-
With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
-
I understand to not want to read long winded answers but I think some people just say fuck off immediately without reading based on who the writer is. JMOPostGameOrangeSlices said:
You don't understand it? Any of it?JoeEDangerously said:
Anyone who values other peoples opinions. Teq is one of us. I don’t understand the vitriol some have for himSources said:
who exactly is your target audience here?Tequilla said:Interior prospects for sure ... not sure that I see anything resembling rare traits and the motors can be a tad more consistent at times in some of the video I watched. Definitely need some good S&C work and development. Probably shouldn't expect to see on the field before RS Soph levels in any kind of a rotation at best IMO. If they are playing earlier than that I might be concerned.
Yeah right. -
Fuck offJoeEDangerously said:
I understand to not want to read long winded answers but I think some people just say fuck off immediately without reading based on who the writer is. JMOPostGameOrangeSlices said:
You don't understand it? Any of it?JoeEDangerously said:
Anyone who values other peoples opinions. Teq is one of us. I don’t understand the vitriol some have for himSources said:
who exactly is your target audience here?Tequilla said:Interior prospects for sure ... not sure that I see anything resembling rare traits and the motors can be a tad more consistent at times in some of the video I watched. Definitely need some good S&C work and development. Probably shouldn't expect to see on the field before RS Soph levels in any kind of a rotation at best IMO. If they are playing earlier than that I might be concerned.
Yeah right. -
When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.HFNY said:With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.
Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well. -
While the form on that bird isn't bad, there are some concerns I have about the rest of the appendages. Might want to get those things looked at.Tequilla said: -
-
The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.Edwin_Bambino said:
When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.HFNY said:With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.
Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option. -
I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?dOgmaster said:
The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.Edwin_Bambino said:
When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.HFNY said:With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.
Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
-
They areDawgtillDeath said:
I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?dOgmaster said:
The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.Edwin_Bambino said:
When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.HFNY said:With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.
Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
-
I imagine the staff told the Parker family that they can guarantee their scholarship for 1 or 2 years but after that, it's dependent on what progress they show. Otherwise, they transfer to a lower tier upper mid-west school and finish their education there.
-
In 2014, the PAC-12 voted to guarantee all scholarships for four years. Scholarships cannot be cancelled for athletic reasons. Would have to be a violation of team rules or academic issue.theLSkid said:
They areDawgtillDeath said:
I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?dOgmaster said:
The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.Edwin_Bambino said:
When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.HFNY said:With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.
Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
The following year, all P5 conferences and Notre Dame voted to follow suit. All 65 P5 schools now guarantee scholarships for four years if the letter of intent and scholarship agreement are signed prior to freshman year.
The more I think about it, they should vote to abolish this rule. If there's going to be unfettered free agency via the transfer portal, the schools should be allowed to be just as cutthroat. -
They plan for success. I doubt they talk about dropping their scholarship at all while they are being recruited.HFNY said:I imagine the staff told the Parker family that they can guarantee their scholarship for 1 or 2 years but after that, it's dependent on what progress they show. Otherwise, they transfer to a lower tier upper mid-west school and finish their education there.
-
This was made in order to protect shitty athletes, I believe the rules is that players cannot lose scholarships due to poor performance, but they can lose it due to:1to392831weretaken said:
In 2014, the PAC-12 voted to guarantee all scholarships for four years. Scholarships cannot be cancelled for athletic reasons. Would have to be a violation of team rules or academic issue.theLSkid said:
They areDawgtillDeath said:
I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?dOgmaster said:
The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.Edwin_Bambino said:
When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.HFNY said:With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.
Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
The following year, all P5 conferences and Notre Dame voted to follow suit. All 65 P5 schools now guarantee scholarships for four years if the letter of intent and scholarship agreement are signed prior to freshman year.
The more I think about it, they should vote to abolish this rule. If there's going to be unfettered free agency via the transfer portal, the schools should be allowed to be just as cutthroat.
Beingruled to be ineligible for competition;
Provides fraudulent information on an application, letter of intent, or financial aid agreement;
Engages in serious misconduct that rises to the level of being disciplined by the university’s regular student disciplinary board;
Voluntarily quits their team; or
Violates a university policy or rule which is not related to athletic conditions or ability (such as a university policy on class attendance, or an athletic department policy regarding proper conduct on a team trip).
So, we ? are both right?
-
Well, now that you've reversed your stance to exactly what I stated, yes, we're now both right.theLSkid said:
This was made in order to protect shitty athletes, I believe the rules is that players cannot lose scholarships due to poor performance, but they can lose it due to:1to392831weretaken said:
In 2014, the PAC-12 voted to guarantee all scholarships for four years. Scholarships cannot be cancelled for athletic reasons. Would have to be a violation of team rules or academic issue.theLSkid said:
They areDawgtillDeath said:
I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?dOgmaster said:
The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.Edwin_Bambino said:
When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.HFNY said:With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.
Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
The following year, all P5 conferences and Notre Dame voted to follow suit. All 65 P5 schools now guarantee scholarships for four years if the letter of intent and scholarship agreement are signed prior to freshman year.
The more I think about it, they should vote to abolish this rule. If there's going to be unfettered free agency via the transfer portal, the schools should be allowed to be just as cutthroat.
Beingruled to be ineligible for competition;
Provides fraudulent information on an application, letter of intent, or financial aid agreement;
Engages in serious misconduct that rises to the level of being disciplined by the university’s regular student disciplinary board;
Voluntarily quits their team; or
Violates a university policy or rule which is not related to athletic conditions or ability (such as a university policy on class attendance, or an athletic department policy regarding proper conduct on a team trip).
So, we ? are both right? -
Exactly.1to392831weretaken said:
Well, now that you've reversed your stance to exactly what I stated, yes, we're now both right.theLSkid said:
This was made in order to protect shitty athletes, I believe the rules is that players cannot lose scholarships due to poor performance, but they can lose it due to:1to392831weretaken said:
In 2014, the PAC-12 voted to guarantee all scholarships for four years. Scholarships cannot be cancelled for athletic reasons. Would have to be a violation of team rules or academic issue.theLSkid said:
They areDawgtillDeath said:
I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?dOgmaster said:
The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.Edwin_Bambino said:
When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.HFNY said:With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.
Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
The following year, all P5 conferences and Notre Dame voted to follow suit. All 65 P5 schools now guarantee scholarships for four years if the letter of intent and scholarship agreement are signed prior to freshman year.
The more I think about it, they should vote to abolish this rule. If there's going to be unfettered free agency via the transfer portal, the schools should be allowed to be just as cutthroat.
Beingruled to be ineligible for competition;
Provides fraudulent information on an application, letter of intent, or financial aid agreement;
Engages in serious misconduct that rises to the level of being disciplined by the university’s regular student disciplinary board;
Voluntarily quits their team; or
Violates a university policy or rule which is not related to athletic conditions or ability (such as a university policy on class attendance, or an athletic department policy regarding proper conduct on a team trip).
So, we ? are both right?