Masks


https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/29/these-12-graphs-show-mask-mandates-do-nothing-to-stop-covid/
Faking ‘Science’ to Achieve Political Goals
These same politicians and health officials are so desperate to make people believe in masks that they doctor charts to make their case, even when their own data actually undermines them. So what is the actual science behind masks? Let’s begin by reviewing the leading scientific studies.
The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University summarized six international studies which “showed that masks alone have no significant effect in interrupting the spread of ILI or influenza in the general population, nor in healthcare workers.” Oxford went on to say that “that despite two decades of pandemic preparedness, there is considerable uncertainty as to the value of wearing masks.” They prophetically warned that this has “left the field wide open for the play of opinions, radical views and political influence.”
A study of health-care workers in more than 1,600 hospitals showed that cloth masks only filtered out 3 percent of particles. An article in the New England Journal of Medicine stated, “[W]earing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection” and that “[T]he desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”
There are many other credible studies showing lack of mask efficacy, such as studies published in the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Cambridge University Press, Oxford Clinical Infectious Diseases, and Influenza Journal, just to name a few.
Studies do show masks can help in the case of direct respiratory droplets, which would matter if somebody is coughing, breathing, or sneezing directly on your face. That happens normally in a tight and highly confined space.
But the plentiful evidence we have indicates masks would not meaningfully help with aerosol transmission, where two people are just in the same area, or even the same room. This is because the two people end up breathing the same air, with or without a mask, as visually demonstrated in this video...
Why Don’t Masks Work?
Why don’t masks work on the general public? For one, if you read the fine print on most consumer masks you will see something along the line of “not intended for medical purposes and has not been tested to reduce the transmission of disease.” Masks can work well when they’re fully sealed, properly fitted, changed often, and have a filter designed for virus-sized particles. This represents none of the common masks available on the consumer market, making universal masking much more of a confidence trick than a medical solution.
If we actually wanted effective masks, then manufacturers should be conducting scientific tests evaluating masks specifically for their ability to reduce the spread of coronavirus. The Food and Drug Administration and CDC should be making recommendations on which masks to use and approving masks based on their scientific efficacy rather than promoting the wrapping of any piece of miscellaneous cloth around your face.
Many powerful institutions have too much political capital invested in the mask narrative at this point, so the dogma is perpetuated.
Effective masks, if they exist, should then be distributed to highly vulnerable groups for use only in rare and extenuating circumstances. There would be little point for the population at large to wear masks all the time because while focused protection may be possible, it is not possible to eradicate the virus at this point or stop its spread.



Comments
-
As the Dakotas both roar past 5% infection rate.
-
The virus will do what it will do, regardless of masks.
-
higher infection rate = higher immunity rate 3-5 days from now.
Greek god of youth Trumpy and KKKriste walk around helping the country out with herd immunity, so can you! -
YepDude61 said:The virus will do what it will do, regardless of masks.
-
I want to vote for a President who will make national policy based off of the Dakotas and people catching colds as winter hits the Plains.
When Noem says she is for freedom and science she is allowing the scared blue states to kill tens of thousands and the economy if they want to. They just don't have to.
And South Dakota can stay open and not kill their economy and deal with the sniffles.
@HHusky and his ilk hate freedom and choice unless its killing tissue mass -
I won’t go so far as regardless. I think they have some effect. However it might be canceled by false security. It would be great if they were 90% effective. Instead we have some that believe 100% effectiveness and others -500%, and we get no placebo benefit of opening this bitch up.Dude61 said:The virus will do what it will do, regardless of masks.
-
And something Jay Inslee doesn’t want you to know: there’s no civil enforcement mechanism for individuals & masks. Businesses are the ones who can get in trouble.
-
Might as well as not even tryDude61 said:The virus will do what it will do, regardless of masks.
-
Please stop with your rational thinkingGrundleStiltzkin said:
I won’t go so far as regardless. I think they have some effect. However it might be canceled by false security. It would be great if they were 90% effective. Instead we have some that believe 100% effectiveness and others -500%, and we get no placebo benefit of opening this bitch up.Dude61 said:The virus will do what it will do, regardless of masks.
-
Policy makers don't believe masks are terrible effective either, evidenced by the policies made.HuskyJW said:
Please stop with your rational thinkingGrundleStiltzkin said:
I won’t go so far as regardless. I think they have some effect. However it might be canceled by false security. It would be great if they were 90% effective. Instead we have some that believe 100% effectiveness and others -500%, and we get no placebo benefit of opening this bitch up.Dude61 said:The virus will do what it will do, regardless of masks.
-
Masks don't work and the virus is going to virus
That's rational. Sorry but anything else is fear and superstition -
Europe did everything right and Trump refuses to follow the science
-
But what will the fascists do when they catch you without one?Dude61 said:The virus will do what it will do, regardless of masks.
-
The thing that pisses me off is that Vitamin D and zinc supplements are much more effective in stopping cases than masks. But taking entirely safe supplements in the privacy of your own home offers no virtue signaling. All you hear is lock everyone down and masks.
-
We need to censor poasts like this.RaceBannon said:Masks don't work and the virus is going to virus
That's rational. Sorry but anything else is fear and superstition -
Some of us (not JW or Herr Dazzler) knew this in March 2020.
I was right -
-
Well at least we know that masking the population that is least vulnerable to it has been super effective. Shout out to Randi Weingarten and democrats everywhere for making it happen, too bad there are no states or other countries that didn't mask up their kids for us to compare the results.
-
HHusky said:
As the Dakotas both roar past 5% infection rate.
-
Dialed inRaceBannon said:Masks don't work and the virus is going to virus
That's rational. Sorry but anything else is fear and superstition -
-
Masks are for fags case closed
-
We're still waiting for the lockdown liberals and mandate morons to admit they were wrong.
-
Never gonna happenhardhat said:We're still waiting for the lockdown liberals and mandate morons to admit they were wrong.
Which is why we need a national smear the queer day.
-
Maybe with firearms. Rewrites the rules a tax though.PurpleThrobber said:
Never gonna happenhardhat said:We're still waiting for the lockdown liberals and mandate morons to admit they were wrong.
Which is why we need a national smear the queer day. -
Need them so JWs kid knows who to fear.Pitchfork51 said:Masks are for fags case closed
-
-
Lol shut the fuck upHHusky said:As the Dakotas both roar past 5% infection rate.
-
I wear one if I have to because I’m not going to argue with strangers about it, but yeah. Enough is enough.Pitchfork51 said:Masks are for fags case closed
-
"Infection rates", that is classic