Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Parker twins

2»

Comments

  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Some of you deserve to die
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club
    DawgtillDeath said:

    Tequilla said:

    sinceredawg said:

    JoeEDangerously said:

    Sources said:

    Tequilla said:

    Interior prospects for sure ... not sure that I see anything resembling rare traits and the motors can be a tad more consistent at times in some of the video I watched. Definitely need some good S&C work and development. Probably shouldn't expect to see on the field before RS Soph levels in any kind of a rotation at best IMO. If they are playing earlier than that I might be concerned.

    who exactly is your target audience here?
    Anyone who values other peoples opinions. Teq is one of us. I don’t understand the vitriol some have for him
    Teq was great back in pod days, but more recently he's spewing all these FoxNews/KGB talking points on Twitter so it's hard to respect him.
    98% of the political takes that I make are focused on exposing hypocrisy and building awareness to those that are blind to having opinions based on anything other than whether it comes from the mouth of a D or R

    If you have an issue you can always ask for clarification or discuss …

    I’ve been very consistent in saying that at least in my opinion getting vaccinated matters, that from the beginning we haven’t been measuring the right data (you can check the tug on that), and that there are slippery slopes to mandates.

    I’ve also been very vocal on many of the decisions we’ve made the last 12 months being bad for inflation and being vocal from before the election that Joe Biden was not a good choice as President. I’ve also said that Trump was a worthless choice as well and that the election options we had in 2020 were pathetic.

    Sure sounds like a bunch of conspiracy theories to me …
    Yup, Bidens leaking oil and trumps a totally insane cult leader. If that's the best we've got were all fucked. The easily led just can't see it yet. The two party system is spiraling into the ground.
    Now two things before you all jump on my shit:
    1) I'm not a d or an r they are worthless. We need a 4 party system with liz, bernie and the progressives on the far looney left, old school D's and R's center left/right, and the trumps on the far batshit crazy right.
    2) Here's a preemptive FUCKOFF for all the F-O's about to come my way.

    Now back to our regular scheduled Dawg program.
    I think you might be surprised how many Tug denizens hate the Uniparty completely. Ds and Rs. Mostly all shit. You are not alone.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,230 Founders Club
    FireCohen said:

    Some of you deserve to die

    After the ups and downs of this thread I’ll go first
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,380
    With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,230 Founders Club
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    JoeEDangerously said:

    Sources said:

    Tequilla said:

    Interior prospects for sure ... not sure that I see anything resembling rare traits and the motors can be a tad more consistent at times in some of the video I watched. Definitely need some good S&C work and development. Probably shouldn't expect to see on the field before RS Soph levels in any kind of a rotation at best IMO. If they are playing earlier than that I might be concerned.

    who exactly is your target audience here?
    Anyone who values other peoples opinions. Teq is one of us. I don’t understand the vitriol some have for him
    You don't understand it? Any of it?

    Yeah right.
    I understand to not want to read long winded answers but I think some people just say fuck off immediately without reading based on who the writer is. JMO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    JoeEDangerously said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    JoeEDangerously said:

    Sources said:

    Tequilla said:

    Interior prospects for sure ... not sure that I see anything resembling rare traits and the motors can be a tad more consistent at times in some of the video I watched. Definitely need some good S&C work and development. Probably shouldn't expect to see on the field before RS Soph levels in any kind of a rotation at best IMO. If they are playing earlier than that I might be concerned.

    who exactly is your target audience here?
    Anyone who values other peoples opinions. Teq is one of us. I don’t understand the vitriol some have for him
    You don't understand it? Any of it?

    Yeah right.
    I understand to not want to read long winded answers but I think some people just say fuck off immediately without reading based on who the writer is. JMO
    Fuck off
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    Tequilla said:


    While the form on that bird isn't bad, there are some concerns I have about the rest of the appendages. Might want to get those things looked at.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    TheHB said:

    Tequilla said:


    While the form on that bird isn't bad, there are some concerns I have about the rest of the appendages. Might want to get those things looked at.
    That’s not me you fucking asshole
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    Tequilla said:

    TheHB said:

    Tequilla said:


    While the form on that bird isn't bad, there are some concerns I have about the rest of the appendages. Might want to get those things looked at.
    That’s not me you fucking asshole
    Didn't say it was, butter cup.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dOgmaster
    dOgmaster Member Posts: 589
    Edwin_Bambino said:

    HFNY said:

    With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.

    When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.

    If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.

    Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
    The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.

    And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DawgtillDeath
    DawgtillDeath Member Posts: 155
    dOgmaster said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    HFNY said:

    With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.

    When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.

    If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.

    Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
    The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.

    And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
    I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • theLSkid
    theLSkid Member Posts: 344
    DawgtillDeath said:

    dOgmaster said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    HFNY said:

    With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.

    When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.

    If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.

    Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
    The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.

    And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
    I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?
    They are

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,380
    I imagine the staff told the Parker family that they can guarantee their scholarship for 1 or 2 years but after that, it's dependent on what progress they show. Otherwise, they transfer to a lower tier upper mid-west school and finish their education there.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    HFNY said:

    I imagine the staff told the Parker family that they can guarantee their scholarship for 1 or 2 years but after that, it's dependent on what progress they show. Otherwise, they transfer to a lower tier upper mid-west school and finish their education there.

    They plan for success. I doubt they talk about dropping their scholarship at all while they are being recruited.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • theLSkid
    theLSkid Member Posts: 344
    1to392831weretaken said:

    theLSkid said:

    DawgtillDeath said:

    dOgmaster said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    HFNY said:

    With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.

    When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.

    If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.

    Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
    The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.

    And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
    I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?
    They are

    In 2014, the PAC-12 voted to guarantee all scholarships for four years. Scholarships cannot be cancelled for athletic reasons. Would have to be a violation of team rules or academic issue.

    The following year, all P5 conferences and Notre Dame voted to follow suit. All 65 P5 schools now guarantee scholarships for four years if the letter of intent and scholarship agreement are signed prior to freshman year.

    The more I think about it, they should vote to abolish this rule. If there's going to be unfettered free agency via the transfer portal, the schools should be allowed to be just as cutthroat.
    This was made in order to protect shitty athletes, I believe the rules is that players cannot lose scholarships due to poor performance, but they can lose it due to:

    Beingruled to be ineligible for competition;

    Provides fraudulent information on an application, letter of intent, or financial aid agreement;

    Engages in serious misconduct that rises to the level of being disciplined by the university’s regular student disciplinary board;

    Voluntarily quits their team; or

    Violates a university policy or rule which is not related to athletic conditions or ability (such as a university policy on class attendance, or an athletic department policy regarding proper conduct on a team trip).

    So, we ? are both right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    theLSkid said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    theLSkid said:

    DawgtillDeath said:

    dOgmaster said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    HFNY said:

    With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.

    When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.

    If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.

    Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
    The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.

    And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
    I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?
    They are

    In 2014, the PAC-12 voted to guarantee all scholarships for four years. Scholarships cannot be cancelled for athletic reasons. Would have to be a violation of team rules or academic issue.

    The following year, all P5 conferences and Notre Dame voted to follow suit. All 65 P5 schools now guarantee scholarships for four years if the letter of intent and scholarship agreement are signed prior to freshman year.

    The more I think about it, they should vote to abolish this rule. If there's going to be unfettered free agency via the transfer portal, the schools should be allowed to be just as cutthroat.
    This was made in order to protect shitty athletes, I believe the rules is that players cannot lose scholarships due to poor performance, but they can lose it due to:

    Beingruled to be ineligible for competition;

    Provides fraudulent information on an application, letter of intent, or financial aid agreement;

    Engages in serious misconduct that rises to the level of being disciplined by the university’s regular student disciplinary board;

    Voluntarily quits their team; or

    Violates a university policy or rule which is not related to athletic conditions or ability (such as a university policy on class attendance, or an athletic department policy regarding proper conduct on a team trip).

    So, we ? are both right?
    Well, now that you've reversed your stance to exactly what I stated, yes, we're now both right.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • theLSkid
    theLSkid Member Posts: 344
    1to392831weretaken said:

    theLSkid said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    theLSkid said:

    DawgtillDeath said:

    dOgmaster said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    HFNY said:

    With the portal, I wonder if the staff said you'll get 2-3 years of academic prowess and a chance to get in the rotation but if not, you can portal to Eastern or Central Michigan.

    When you don’t have time to build legit class like this staff has had, taking a bunch of fliers on kids you might be able to develop isn’t the worst idea.

    If they suck they can portal out again in a few years and we can hopefully replace them with better portal players.

    Of course this is kind of a Doog take, those not rated kids we take and develop, if they turn out to be players could also portal to USC or Bama in a few years as well.
    The problem with that approach is that Boner can’t force them to portal out. Their schollie is guaranteed for 4 years. Boner can over recruit that position, but that is it.

    And the players may realize the academic prowess at uw and decide that staying at the bottom of the depth chart and getting a degree is the best option.
    I thought Schollies were renewed yearly?
    They are

    In 2014, the PAC-12 voted to guarantee all scholarships for four years. Scholarships cannot be cancelled for athletic reasons. Would have to be a violation of team rules or academic issue.

    The following year, all P5 conferences and Notre Dame voted to follow suit. All 65 P5 schools now guarantee scholarships for four years if the letter of intent and scholarship agreement are signed prior to freshman year.

    The more I think about it, they should vote to abolish this rule. If there's going to be unfettered free agency via the transfer portal, the schools should be allowed to be just as cutthroat.
    This was made in order to protect shitty athletes, I believe the rules is that players cannot lose scholarships due to poor performance, but they can lose it due to:

    Beingruled to be ineligible for competition;

    Provides fraudulent information on an application, letter of intent, or financial aid agreement;

    Engages in serious misconduct that rises to the level of being disciplined by the university’s regular student disciplinary board;

    Voluntarily quits their team; or

    Violates a university policy or rule which is not related to athletic conditions or ability (such as a university policy on class attendance, or an athletic department policy regarding proper conduct on a team trip).

    So, we ? are both right?
    Well, now that you've reversed your stance to exactly what I stated, yes, we're now both right.
    Exactly.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter