Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Joe Biden Will Be Impeached in November, Steve Bannon Says

«1

Comments

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,543 Founders Club

    Much as the Throbber would like to see Biden impeached AND convicted of those impeachment charges, never underestimate the GOP's ability to fuck up elections.

    Things are changing dramatically at the grassroots level
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club

    If they don't have 60 senate votes then don't be retards like the democrats

    It’s 67. 5 years ago I was in the just let Obama, Hilary fade off camp. I no longer am because of Russia, Ukraine, Jan 6 and Covid.

    Republicans should go hard after anyone and everything next year. Specifically Covid.

    Force democrat senators to vote against impeachment for Hunters China and Ukraine stuff. Force them to vote against impeachment for willful law breaking at the border and Afghanistan.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

    If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

    I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter

    I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

    If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

    I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

    He'd be gone today if he hadn't "selected" Kameltoe as VP.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club

    I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

    If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

    I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

    Lol I remember that talking point. Harris was going to be so popular that she’d only be limited in years as president by term limits and not by votes.

    He’s gonna be gone near the start of next year more to avoid the endless investigations.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    Why impeach him? The longer this incompetent Alzheimer’s patient is president the more damage it causes Democrats.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter

    Why impeach him? The longer this incompetent Alzheimer’s patient is president the more damage it causes Democrats.

    Get his and Hunter's banking records and find if he has any offshore accounts and where his 10% of the top went. The problem is that he is bought and paid for by the chicoms and most likely they and the Russians have some real leverage over Cho Bai Den unlike Trump. We need to stand up to the chicoms like yesterday and not in 2025 maybe. How many billions of dollars have we paid the chicoms for PPE for a virus they created and let loose. Plus scare the sh*t out of the dems on the border for failure to enforce the laws that he swore to protect.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,000 Standard Supporter

    I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

    If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

    I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

    He'd be gone today if he hadn't "selected" Kameltoe as VP.
    I'm convinced he did that as an insurance policy for him to not get Das boot
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

    If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

    I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

    He'd be gone today if he hadn't "selected" Kameltoe as VP.
    Imagine this scenario: Harris resigns this year under pressure from the DNC because of reasons. Hilary is named VP. Biden gets removed on January 1/21/23. 💥 Hillary is president for up to 10 years.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club

    I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

    If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

    I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

    Wouldn't his replacement have to be Harris? Is there a legitimate scenario whereby she is not the next in line? To me, this was the most confounding choice for his VP if the plan was always what you just laid out. She doesn't make sense and never has.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    RoadTrip said:

    I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

    If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

    I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

    Wouldn't his replacement have to be Harris? Is there a legitimate scenario whereby she is not the next in line? To me, this was the most confounding choice for his VP if the plan was always what you just laid out. She doesn't make sense and never has.
    Not if they have her "resign" first.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,152 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    If they don't have 60 senate votes then don't be retards like the democrats

    It’s 67. 5 years ago I was in the just let Obama, Hilary fade off camp. I no longer am because of Russia, Ukraine, Jan 6 and Covid.

    Republicans should go hard after anyone and everything next year. Specifically Covid.

    Force democrat senators to vote against impeachment for Hunters China and Ukraine stuff. Force them to vote against impeachment for willful law breaking at the border and Afghanistan.
    I'm all in favor of getting even but Bitch McConnel is more scared of Trump than Biden. Nothing is stopping the GOP now other than a lack of guts. These issues could be front and center even as a minority party

    The ones that try like Boebert and Greene are marginalized and ignored and their own "leadership" abandons them

    Put Biden up for impeachment and the entire media complex goes into full attack on the right. A loss makes him stronger like it did Clinton, The squish middle did pay attention to the failed effort against Trump

    All I'm saying is that if you're gonna do it then fucking win

    In the meantime stop sitting around scratching your balls and make noise NOW
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

    If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

    I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

    He'd be gone today if he hadn't "selected" Kameltoe as VP.
    Imagine this scenario: Harris resigns this year under pressure from the DNC because of reasons. Hilary is named VP. Biden gets removed on January 1/21/23. 💥 Hillary is president for up to 10 years.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter
    I don't think you get to just name someone VP?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2022
    Sledog said:

    I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

    Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club

    Sledog said:

    I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

    Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.
    So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    Sledog said:

    I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

    Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.
    So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.
    Yeah, she is VP until she resigns, dies, impeached or becomes President due to a presidential vacancy. So, if Harris becomes president because the dementia patient resigns or replaced under the 25th amendment the VP spot is vacant and there is no VP to break a Senate tie breaker on any 50-50 split. Same thing if Kameltoe resigns. No VP to exercise the VP tie breaker vote as set out in the Constitution.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Bob_C said:

    Sledog said:

    I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

    Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.
    So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.
    Yeah, she is VP until she resigns, dies, impeached or becomes President due to a presidential vacancy. So, if Harris becomes president because the dementia patient resigns or replaced under the 25th amendment the VP spot is vacant and there is no VP to break a Senate tie breaker on any 50-50 split. Same thing if Kameltoe resigns. No VP to exercise the VP tie breaker vote as set out in the Constitution.
    If Harris is president and can’t get her own VP in there, then the position remains. A vacant until the election. (See LBJ). If Harris is then removed from office, the speaker of the house is then president.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Bob_C said:

    Sledog said:

    I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

    Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.
    So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.
    Yeah, she is VP until she resigns, dies, impeached or becomes President due to a presidential vacancy. So, if Harris becomes president because the dementia patient resigns or replaced under the 25th amendment the VP spot is vacant and there is no VP to break a Senate tie breaker on any 50-50 split. Same thing if Kameltoe resigns. No VP to exercise the VP tie breaker vote as set out in the Constitution.
    If Harris is president and can’t get her own VP in there, then the position remains. A vacant until the election. (See LBJ). If Harris is then removed from office, the speaker of the house is then president.
    So McCarty will be POTUS.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    46XiJCAB said:

    Bob_C said:

    Sledog said:

    I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

    Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.
    So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.
    Yeah, she is VP until she resigns, dies, impeached or becomes President due to a presidential vacancy. So, if Harris becomes president because the dementia patient resigns or replaced under the 25th amendment the VP spot is vacant and there is no VP to break a Senate tie breaker on any 50-50 split. Same thing if Kameltoe resigns. No VP to exercise the VP tie breaker vote as set out in the Constitution.
    If Harris is president and can’t get her own VP in there, then the position remains. A vacant until the election. (See LBJ). If Harris is then removed from office, the speaker of the house is then president.
    So McCarty will be POTUS.
    Well, no. Because the VP spot remains vacant until the election. Pelosi will be in line until then.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter

    Bob_C said:

    Sledog said:

    I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

    Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.
    So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.
    Yeah, she is VP until she resigns, dies, impeached or becomes President due to a presidential vacancy. So, if Harris becomes president because the dementia patient resigns or replaced under the 25th amendment the VP spot is vacant and there is no VP to break a Senate tie breaker on any 50-50 split. Same thing if Kameltoe resigns. No VP to exercise the VP tie breaker vote as set out in the Constitution.
    If dementia patient is still in office Camela votes to break the tie then resigns and goes to the supremes. She has even less business being in the court than the white house.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    "I am in control here." Al Haig.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,543 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    "I am in control here." Al Haig.

    If you're comparing Haig (who looked like Chuck Knox) to Bannon, you're missing the mark. Apples and oranges.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    2 Bold Predictions:
    Biden is going to end the covidian policies by April, even if it will upset the crazy wokies who want to mask forever. I'm not sure if this will matter though. I predict that Biden's obvious mental decline means he's going to be pushed out this summer. He will not be around in November.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    hardhat said:

    2 Bold Predictions:
    Biden is going to end the covidian policies by April, even if it will upset the crazy wokies who want to mask forever. I'm not sure if this will matter though. I predict that Biden's obvious mental decline means he's going to be pushed out this summer. He will not be around in November.

    Today in January, I disagree. I listened/watched to that presser a few weeks ago. It was not good, however, he held it together for 2 hours. I don't think he's consistently gonzo enough for invoking the 25th or whatever. Just how I see it.

    Re the Vid, a month ago, there seemed to be an Open Up narrative shift, only to retrench again. Sad!