Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The whitewashing of Martin Luther King
Comments
-
No one knows how many Indians were here. 100 million is pure bullshit. Ken Burns did some research on it years ago and came up with a 3-4 million estimate for the USA total.SFGbob said:
The cut and paste Kunt strikes again!!!!TheKobeStopper said:
Agree.RaceBannon said:
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
Anyone who knows anything about American Indian history knows that they were a ruthless group. Cannibalism, rape, slaughter, horrible torture, forced starvation, whole tribe extermination, ethnic cleansing, slavery. They were brutal people.
I always crack up when liberals try to use the plight of American Indians as some sort of blame game that cleanses their own souls just for uttering the atrocities. I always ask them why they live here if 500 year old history bothers them so much. Move to a place that has no such history. The reality is there is no place on earth without such history. In the same breath they espouse socialism which is much more recent and violent than any other type of government or group of people. The people who are socialist are clearly the most violent in modern history. But hey, lets give it another shot right?
-
To be fair not all tribes were as you portray them. Plenty of relatively peaceful agrarian tribes. But on balance you are correct. The historical record shows that my people were a pretty martial lot. Heavy into fighting and fucking. Not unlike, oh, pretty much every other early world society. Gauls. Vikings. Rus. 1st Nation. African. Greasy Slavs. Shogun Yellows. If you go back 500 years it was pretty much all warfare all the time everywhere in the world. "Rape, murder and pillage" was sport and hobby all over the world.Bendintheriver said:
No one knows how many Indians were here. 100 million is pure bullshit. Ken Burns did some research on it years ago and came up with a 3-4 million estimate for the USA total.SFGbob said:
The cut and paste Kunt strikes again!!!!TheKobeStopper said:
Agree.RaceBannon said:
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
Anyone who knows anything about American Indian history knows that they were a ruthless group. Cannibalism, rape, slaughter, horrible torture, forced starvation, whole tribe extermination, ethnic cleansing, slavery. They were brutal people.
I always crack up when liberals try to use the plight of American Indians as some sort of blame game that cleanses their own souls just for uttering the atrocities. I always ask them why they live here if 500 year old history bothers them so much. Move to a place that has no such history. The reality is there is no place on earth without such history. In the same breath they espouse socialism which is much more recent and violent than any other type of government or group of people. The people who are socialist are clearly the most violent in modern history. But hey, lets give it another shot right? -
Yeah but stillTheKobeStopper said:
Agree.RaceBannon said:
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
The numbers on your commie pals add up -
They certainly killed a lot of people, even if 100 million is bullshit. That’s one reason why my chosen ideology looks nothing like theirs. In name only.RaceBannon said:
Yeah but stillTheKobeStopper said:
Agree.RaceBannon said:
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
The numbers on your commie pals add up -
Just Mao's great leap forward was around 50 million. No one really know how many Stalin knocked off but he starved some 8 million to death in the Ukraine not to mention all the gulags, purges, firing squads and disappearances. Hitler was 6 million+. No wonder you believe this shit, you can not think for yourself. Move to Cuba bitch or make sure you wear bright orange when you're on the other side so I can spot you more easily.TheKobeStopper said:
They certainly killed a lot of people, even if 100 million is bullshit. That’s one reason why my chosen ideology looks nothing like theirs. In name only.RaceBannon said:
Yeah but stillTheKobeStopper said:
Agree.RaceBannon said:
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
The numbers on your commie pals add up -
It's the sameTheKobeStopper said:
They certainly killed a lot of people, even if 100 million is bullshit. That’s one reason why my chosen ideology looks nothing like theirs. In name only.RaceBannon said:
Yeah but stillTheKobeStopper said:
Agree.RaceBannon said:
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
The numbers on your commie pals add up
The road always leads to the same dead end -
Mostly peaceful natives.
-
They sold each other outMikeDamone said:Mostly peaceful natives.
-
Sounds exactly like what happens in communism.TheKobeStopper said:
So today capitalism has outlived its usefulness. It has brought about a system that takes necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classesPitchfork51 said:Mlk was overrated and would be hated by the left as an uncle Tom
I think he’d do alright.
Meanwhile in the USA the common person has multiple cars, all the food one can eat, store full of goods (that is until Biden got his guys in there), devices in every pocket more powerful than supercomputers 40 years ago with. Instant access to vast sources of information, hundreds of entertainment options in every household…etc..
But yeah, capitalism has taken away necessities from the masses. My guess is MLK would have evolved in the issue. Much like he might have in gay marriage, like Obama did he read the tea leaves and deciding to support gay marriage was political shrewd for his 2012 campaign. -
Kobe wants worker coops that are capitalized by some unknown method. You just want to steal labor.MikeDamone said:
Sounds exactly like what happens in communism.TheKobeStopper said:
So today capitalism has outlived its usefulness. It has brought about a system that takes necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classesPitchfork51 said:Mlk was overrated and would be hated by the left as an uncle Tom
I think he’d do alright.
Meanwhile in the USA the common person has multiple cars, all the food one can eat, store full of goods (that is until Biden got his guys in there), devices in every pocket more powerful than supercomputers 40 years ago with. Instant access to vast sources of information, hundreds of entertainment options in every household…etc..
But yeah, capitalism has taken away necessities from the masses. My guess is MLK would have evolved in the issue. Much like he might have in gay marriage, like Obama did he read the tea leaves and deciding to support gay marriage was political shrewd for his 2012 campaign.
