Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The whitewashing of Martin Luther King
Comments
-
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists -
MikeDamone said:
You’re disgustingTheKobeStopper said:
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.GrundleStiltzkin said:The man held a diverse set of opinions
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.MikeDamone said:
You’re disgustingTheKobeStopper said:
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.GrundleStiltzkin said:The man held a diverse set of opinions
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.
200+ million dead from evils of communism and socialism in just the 20th centuryMikeDamone said:
You’re disgustingTheKobeStopper said:
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.GrundleStiltzkin said:The man held a diverse set of opinions
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst. -
Oh you wanted me to add to the 200+ million by including the 18th and 19th centuries? You’re terrible at this.TheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros? -
I'll give MLK pass since he was a relatively young man who said that in the 60s when the abject failure of Socialism wasn't readily apparent like it became later. You have no excuse Kobe, the failure of Socialism is all very apparent and you just ignore it, hell you're so fucking deluded you're still promoting the wonders of Communism.TheKobeStopper said:
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.GrundleStiltzkin said:The man held a diverse set of opinions
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”. -
So you're too big a lightweight Kunt to tell us in your own words.TheKobeStopper said:
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.GrundleStiltzkin said:The man held a diverse set of opinions
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
-
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists -
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
-
Agree.RaceBannon said:
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism -
Pol Pot had roughly 2M fellow Cambodians murdered in an attempt to achieve his socialist Xanadu. But Kobe’s socialism will do it right.
59% of DIMS want the unvaxxed detained in their homes. These lunatics would be Kobe’s socialist homies. -
The cut and paste Kunt strikes again!!!!TheKobeStopper said:
Agree.RaceBannon said:
100 million is also bullshitSFGbob said:
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.RaceBannon said:
Ask the Royalist scum that did itTheKobeStopper said:
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
