PM to Pasadena
Comments
-
I find my fuck-offs bring a degree of spice to my life. I welcome them with open arms.UW_Doog_Bot said:
He complained about downvotes every other day. Gifted me about 30 fuck offs on all my recent comments before committing seppuku. Lol. Boobs jr.FireCohen said:
@PasadenaHuskyFan maybe a fucking idiot, at least he is a not a sandy vag that gets upset over a down vote or wtfLawDawg1 said:Imagine giving a poaster grief for being annoyed by this tard only to have him booted less than a week later on an open forum site like this.
-
creepycoug said:
I find my fuck-offs bring a degree of spice to my life. I welcome them with open arms.UW_Doog_Bot said:
He complained about downvotes every other day. Gifted me about 30 fuck offs on all my recent comments before committing seppuku. Lol. Boobs jr.FireCohen said:
@PasadenaHuskyFan maybe a fucking idiot, at least he is a not a sandy vag that gets upset over a down vote or wtfLawDawg1 said:Imagine giving a poaster grief for being annoyed by this tard only to have him booted less than a week later on an open forum site like this.
-
That's always the fine line to walk.chuck said:I'm not pro banning but man...I really wanted that kid gone. He was wrecking every thread. It doesn't take long with a guy like that before people start drifring off and traffic is reduced to the weirdo and a couple of regulars arguing.
-
while we’re on the subject where are we at with chillydawg making half the boreds unreadable?
-
I feel Chilly and Pasadena are retarded brothers separated at birth.WilburHooksHands said:while we’re on the subject where are we at with chillydawg making half the boreds unreadable?
-
Yeah. I know you wouldn't have banned him if he hadn't asked and that's correct. One out of 10 of his posts were sane and relatively intelligent. It appeared that my tactic of ignoring his shit posts was working for me and a lot of others too, then no warning....DerekJohnson said:
That's always the fine line to walk.chuck said:I'm not pro banning but man...I really wanted that kid gone. He was wrecking every thread. It doesn't take long with a guy like that before people start drifring off and traffic is reduced to the weirdo and a couple of regulars arguing.
That works too. I wonder if he was frustrated that tagging guys he thought would jump in on his side wasn't getting any response and that's what drove him to drink the bleach. -
If I feel like a poster is a vine that has wrapped itself completely around the boards and will ultimately drive away traffic, then I take action.chuck said:
Yeah. I know you wouldn't have banned him if he hadn't asked and that's correct. One out of 10 of his posts were sane and relatively intelligent. It appeared that my tactic of ignoring his shit posts was working for me and a lot of others too, then no warning....DerekJohnson said:
That's always the fine line to walk.chuck said:I'm not pro banning but man...I really wanted that kid gone. He was wrecking every thread. It doesn't take long with a guy like that before people start drifring off and traffic is reduced to the weirdo and a couple of regulars arguing.
That works too. I wonder if he was frustrated that tagging guys he thought would jump in on his side wasn't getting any response and that's what drove him to drink the bleach.
Behind the scenes I was PMing with Pasadena a lot in trying to school him to become better. I never threatened to ban him and I didn't have plans to let him go, but things couldn't continue in the direction they were going, and I was applying subtle pressure, like braces on teeth.
I PM'd with Chilly a couple weeks ago and he is very reasonable. I think he understands the criticisms. He agreed to not post on the main board. The thing is that his posts aren't altogether bad, it's just that he posts so prolifically that it feels like the boards are being choked by vines. So how to promote free speech while not driving all the patrons out of the bar?
Anyway, we'll find middle ground and get things sorted out. He's not a bad guy. -
Chilly brings interesting content but its lost in the volume
-
Chilly is trying to provide a service and seems to be getting his reads down as time goes on. I appreciate all the links. I just don't want to scroll past the same links in a half dozen, or more, different threads.DerekJohnson said:
If I feel like a poster is a vine that has wrapped itself completely around the boards and will ultimately drive away traffic, then I take action.chuck said:
Yeah. I know you wouldn't have banned him if he hadn't asked and that's correct. One out of 10 of his posts were sane and relatively intelligent. It appeared that my tactic of ignoring his shit posts was working for me and a lot of others too, then no warning....DerekJohnson said:
That's always the fine line to walk.chuck said:I'm not pro banning but man...I really wanted that kid gone. He was wrecking every thread. It doesn't take long with a guy like that before people start drifring off and traffic is reduced to the weirdo and a couple of regulars arguing.
That works too. I wonder if he was frustrated that tagging guys he thought would jump in on his side wasn't getting any response and that's what drove him to drink the bleach.
Behind the scenes I was PMing with Pasadena a lot in trying to school him to become better. I never threatened to ban him and I didn't have plans to let him go, but things couldn't continue in the direction they were going, and I was applying subtle pressure, like braces on teeth.
I PM'd with Chilly a couple weeks ago and he is very reasonable. I think he understands the criticisms. He agreed to not post on the main board. The thing is that his posts aren't altogether bad, it's just that he posts so prolifically that it feels like the boards are being choked by vines. So how to promote free speech while not driving all the patrons out of the bar?
Anyway, we'll find middle ground and get things sorted out. He's not a bad guy. -
@ChillyDawg is just another AI. Give it time to get it's algorithms down and it will be dialed in in no time.chuck said:
Chilly is trying to provide a service and seems to be getting his reads down as time goes on. I appreciate all the links. I just don't want to scroll past the same links in a half dozen, or more, different threads.DerekJohnson said:
If I feel like a poster is a vine that has wrapped itself completely around the boards and will ultimately drive away traffic, then I take action.chuck said:
Yeah. I know you wouldn't have banned him if he hadn't asked and that's correct. One out of 10 of his posts were sane and relatively intelligent. It appeared that my tactic of ignoring his shit posts was working for me and a lot of others too, then no warning....DerekJohnson said:
That's always the fine line to walk.chuck said:I'm not pro banning but man...I really wanted that kid gone. He was wrecking every thread. It doesn't take long with a guy like that before people start drifring off and traffic is reduced to the weirdo and a couple of regulars arguing.
That works too. I wonder if he was frustrated that tagging guys he thought would jump in on his side wasn't getting any response and that's what drove him to drink the bleach.
Behind the scenes I was PMing with Pasadena a lot in trying to school him to become better. I never threatened to ban him and I didn't have plans to let him go, but things couldn't continue in the direction they were going, and I was applying subtle pressure, like braces on teeth.
I PM'd with Chilly a couple weeks ago and he is very reasonable. I think he understands the criticisms. He agreed to not post on the main board. The thing is that his posts aren't altogether bad, it's just that he posts so prolifically that it feels like the boards are being choked by vines. So how to promote free speech while not driving all the patrons out of the bar?
Anyway, we'll find middle ground and get things sorted out. He's not a bad guy.
