Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Matt Campbell

13

Comments

  • digits
    digits Member Posts: 1,730

    Campbell was 35-15 at Toledo. Pinkel was 73-27

    At ISU Campbell is meh. BUT its Iowa STATE!



    I'd take Aranda and let USC have Campbell and see what happens

    My only concern with Aranda is the small sample size as a HC: He's only coached 19 games, going 10-9. But I'd still take him over Wilcox, Sitake, etc. in a heartbeat.
  • RatherBeBrewing
    RatherBeBrewing Member Posts: 1,557

    Why don’t people like Campbell exactly?

    -Was youngest head coach in FBS when took over Toledo. Still only 41.
    -Dominated peers in the MAC and scored multiple OOC upsets.
    -First conference title game appearance in Iowa State history. They’ve never won Big 8/12.
    -First major bowl win in ISU history. Johnny Majors and Earle Bruce never won there.
    -Only took two years to turn around the program (remember Stoops year 2?)
    -Consistently in top third of conference since year 2 despite lack of resources or any history or tradition.
    -Coach of the year in his conference four out of nine years (awards are stupid but still)

    It would be an impressive hire. Desirable positions have been offered to Campbell, and if he leaves for Washington then Washington’s dick looks bigger than if they hired DeBoner or Wilcocks.

    I chit-chatted on some Iowa State board last year before the two time defending Pac-12 champs played them. They love the guy, but they’ve been so starved of any semblance of good football that they love him in the same way a Uruguayan rugby player loves human meat. When it’s the best you think you’ll ever get it becomes precious.

    What Campbell has achieved there is impressive. They are recruiting better than they had hoped for, and he somehow managed to put together a team that had three first team All-Americans, one of whom wasn’t even overrated. As for his style, I’d describe it as boring as fuck. Don’t make mistakes and hope the others do. It limits gets blown away, and since a football bounces unpredictably it lets you beat better teams once in a while. I’d say he has a 10 win ceiling at Washington with a 7 win floor. Not quite the excitement of the Peterman highs, but respectable.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,330

    Why don’t people like Campbell exactly?

    -Was youngest head coach in FBS when took over Toledo. Still only 41.
    -Dominated peers in the MAC and scored multiple OOC upsets.
    -First conference title game appearance in Iowa State history. They’ve never won Big 8/12.
    -First major bowl win in ISU history. Johnny Majors and Earle Bruce never won there.
    -Only took two years to turn around the program (remember Stoops year 2?)
    -Consistently in top third of conference since year 2 despite lack of resources or any history or tradition.
    -Coach of the year in his conference four out of nine years (awards are stupid but still)

    It would be an impressive hire. Desirable positions have been offered to Campbell, and if he leaves for Washington then Washington’s dick looks bigger than if they hired DeBoner or Wilcocks.

    I chit-chatted on some Iowa State board last year before the two time defending Pac-12 champs played them. They love the guy, but they’ve been so starved of any semblance of good football that they love him in the same way a Uruguayan rugby player loves human meat. When it’s the best you think you’ll ever get it becomes precious.

    What Campbell has achieved there is impressive. They are recruiting better than they had hoped for, and he somehow managed to put together a team that had three first team All-Americans, one of whom wasn’t even overrated. As for his style, I’d describe it as boring as fuck. Don’t make mistakes and hope the others do. It limits gets blown away, and since a football bounces unpredictably it lets you beat better teams once in a while. I’d say he has a 10 win ceiling at Washington with a 7 win floor. Not quite the excitement of the Peterman highs, but respectable.
    This description sounds exactly like Pete though.
  • digits
    digits Member Posts: 1,730
    A few of Campbell's accomplishments:

    - "Campbell coached four full seasons at Toledo: 2012–2015, amassing a record of 35–15. The 2015 team peaked at No. 20 in the AP Poll, including a victory over Arkansas."
    - "In his second year, Campbell led Iowa State to an 8–5 season that included wins against #3 Oklahoma and #4 TCU."
    - "In 2020, the Cyclones finished in first place in the Big 12, their first regular-season first-place finish of any sort in 119 years. They were selected for the 2021 Fiesta Bowl, the first major-bowl appearance in school history, and defeated Oregon 34-17. They finished ninth in both major polls, the highest final ranking in school history."
  • digits
    digits Member Posts: 1,730

    digits said:

    Campbell was 35-15 at Toledo. Pinkel was 73-27

    At ISU Campbell is meh. BUT its Iowa STATE!



    I'd take Aranda and let USC have Campbell and see what happens

    My only concern with Aranda is the small sample size as a HC: He's only coached 19 games, going 10-9. But I'd still take him over Wilcox, Sitake, etc. in a heartbeat.
    I would take the risk. He knows big time football. He also fired his shitty OC after year one, brought in a good one, and took off this year.

    The drawback is Rhuele was a good program builder himself and didn’t leave Aranda with a bare cupboard. They have talent from the previous staff.
    Which is why I give Campbell a slight edge. He had to build that program from the ground up and won some huge games along the way. Don't get me wrong, I think either would be solid hires. Just say no Wilcox and Sitake.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    NEsnake12 said:

    Second guessing whether he’d be a good hire after this quote from yesterday. Yikes

    He beat Oregon 34-17

    Seems qualified to me
    I was going to ask what he's done


    Covid wonder like Indiana
    Matt Campbell would get you to shitty bowls every year. You probably would never lose to the Montana’s of the world with him.

    But the next November game He wins that counts, will be his first.

  • digits
    digits Member Posts: 1,730
    Kaepsknee said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    Second guessing whether he’d be a good hire after this quote from yesterday. Yikes

    He beat Oregon 34-17

    Seems qualified to me
    I was going to ask what he's done


    Covid wonder like Indiana
    Matt Campbell would get you to shitty bowls every year. You probably would never lose to the Montana’s of the world with him.

    But the next November game He wins that counts, will be his first.


  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,160
    digits said:

    Why don’t people like Campbell exactly?

    -Was youngest head coach in FBS when took over Toledo. Still only 41.
    -Dominated peers in the MAC and scored multiple OOC upsets.
    -First conference title game appearance in Iowa State history. They’ve never won Big 8/12.
    -First major bowl win in ISU history. Johnny Majors and Earle Bruce never won there.
    -Only took two years to turn around the program (remember Stoops year 2?)
    -Consistently in top third of conference since year 2 despite lack of resources or any history or tradition.
    -Coach of the year in his conference four out of nine years (awards are stupid but still)

    It would be an impressive hire. Desirable positions have been offered to Campbell, and if he leaves for Washington then Washington’s dick looks bigger than if they hired DeBoner or Wilcocks.

    I chit-chatted on some Iowa State board last year before the two time defending Pac-12 champs played them. They love the guy, but they’ve been so starved of any semblance of good football that they love him in the same way a Uruguayan rugby player loves human meat. When it’s the best you think you’ll ever get it becomes precious.

    What Campbell has achieved there is impressive. They are recruiting better than they had hoped for, and he somehow managed to put together a team that had three first team All-Americans, one of whom wasn’t even overrated. As for his style, I’d describe it as boring as fuck. Don’t make mistakes and hope the others do. It limits gets blown away, and since a football bounces unpredictably it lets you beat better teams once in a while. I’d say he has a 10 win ceiling at Washington with a 7 win floor. Not quite the excitement of the Peterman highs, but respectable.
    Campbell won a NY6 bowl game, something Peterman never did in three attempts @ UW. But still.

    Asterisk needed
  • sinceredawg
    sinceredawg Member Posts: 834
    I'm so bitter that my test is how the new hire matches up with Cristobal. By this measure, it needs to be someone who has a more impressive name cachet from day 1. But then I realize that this isn't the same as being the best coach long term. So fuck.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    What Franklin did at Vanderbilt was as impressive as Campbell at Iowa State

    Coin toss on that one
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    What Franklin did at Vanderbilt was as impressive as Campbell at Iowa State

    Coin toss on that one

    Hard disagree. I’ve gone through this before but the five teams Franklin beat in conference for his magical 5-3 2012 season had a total of six conference wins. Franklin only stayed at Vandy three seasons and that was his only year with a winning conference record.

    But that was good enough to get him the Penn State job so how are we too big for Campbell?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club

    What Franklin did at Vanderbilt was as impressive as Campbell at Iowa State

    Coin toss on that one

    Hard disagree. I’ve gone through this before but the five teams Franklin beat in conference for his magical 5-3 2012 season had a total of six conference wins. Franklin only stayed at Vandy three seasons and that was his only year with a winning conference record.

    But that was good enough to get him the Penn State job so how are we too big for Campbell?
    When I saw the two downvotes I was torn because I respect your opinion.

    I'm not anti Campbell. I am pro any of the good names and Anyone But Wilcox

    Franklin did get the big job off of Vandy. Derrick Mason before him moved up as well.

    Doing good at a historically bad school is a great resume builder.

    Campbell has been their longer and has sustained winning records. That's a big plus. The SEC was tougher than the Big almost 12 is now. Advantage Franklin

    I'll take a yes from either
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club


    Reading the replies I was reminded that Johnny Majors and Earl Bruce coached there. Majors went to Pitt and won a national championship then to UT. Bruce followed Woody at Ohio State. Tough act. And Walden sucked there


  • RatherBeBrewing
    RatherBeBrewing Member Posts: 1,557
    digits said:

    Why don’t people like Campbell exactly?

    -Was youngest head coach in FBS when took over Toledo. Still only 41.
    -Dominated peers in the MAC and scored multiple OOC upsets.
    -First conference title game appearance in Iowa State history. They’ve never won Big 8/12.
    -First major bowl win in ISU history. Johnny Majors and Earle Bruce never won there.
    -Only took two years to turn around the program (remember Stoops year 2?)
    -Consistently in top third of conference since year 2 despite lack of resources or any history or tradition.
    -Coach of the year in his conference four out of nine years (awards are stupid but still)

    It would be an impressive hire. Desirable positions have been offered to Campbell, and if he leaves for Washington then Washington’s dick looks bigger than if they hired DeBoner or Wilcocks.

    I chit-chatted on some Iowa State board last year before the two time defending Pac-12 champs played them. They love the guy, but they’ve been so starved of any semblance of good football that they love him in the same way a Uruguayan rugby player loves human meat. When it’s the best you think you’ll ever get it becomes precious.

    What Campbell has achieved there is impressive. They are recruiting better than they had hoped for, and he somehow managed to put together a team that had three first team All-Americans, one of whom wasn’t even overrated. As for his style, I’d describe it as boring as fuck. Don’t make mistakes and hope the others do. It limits gets blown away, and since a football bounces unpredictably it lets you beat better teams once in a while. I’d say he has a 10 win ceiling at Washington with a 7 win floor. Not quite the excitement of the Peterman highs, but respectable.
    Campbell won a NY6 bowl game, something Peterman never did in three attempts @ UW. But still.

    How many Zaxby’s Heart of Dallas Bowls has Campbell won?

    I understand that Iowa State is a tough place to win, and occasionally losing to Northern Iowa or Louisiana-Lafayette is to be expected. As is needing a last second TD or 3OT to beat an FCS team. I also have no doubt Campbell will do better in the Apple Cup than he has against Iowa, if only because I don’t think he’d last long enough to go 0-6.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,330

    What Franklin did at Vanderbilt was as impressive as Campbell at Iowa State

    Coin toss on that one

    Hard disagree. I’ve gone through this before but the five teams Franklin beat in conference for his magical 5-3 2012 season had a total of six conference wins. Franklin only stayed at Vandy three seasons and that was his only year with a winning conference record.

    But that was good enough to get him the Penn State job so how are we too big for Campbell?
    When I saw the two downvotes I was torn because I respect your opinion.

    I'm not anti Campbell. I am pro any of the good names and Anyone But Wilcox

    Franklin did get the big job off of Vandy. Derrick Mason before him moved up as well.

    Doing good at a historically bad school is a great resume builder.

    Campbell has been their longer and has sustained winning records. That's a big plus. The SEC was tougher than the Big almost 12 is now. Advantage Franklin

    I'll take a yes from either
    Franklin wasn’t beating the heavyweights in his conference if I recall. Maybe I am wrong. Plus he hired Jon don so nuff said on that.
  • doogville
    doogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,228 Swaye's Wigwam
    He’s 0-6 against freakin Iowa? And people want him to be our coach? Wtf?
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    James Franklin had an absolute STACKED roster for a few years with Trace McSorley, Saquon Barkely, Chris Godwin, Juwan Johnson, Miles Sanders etc. Anyone with a fucking pulse could have won with that group.
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457

    James Franklin had an absolute STACKED roster for a few years with Trace McSorley, Saquon Barkely, Chris Godwin, Juwan Johnson, Miles Sanders etc. Anyone with a fucking pulse could have won with that group.

    Was he responsible for getting those guys? I honestly don't know, but if he was, that's SOMETHING. Franklin doesn't excite me, but if he can keep the good players from leaving the state, keep the island people coming to Seattle and re-establish the California connections, he might be good here.

    He could also be another Willingham.
  • webdawg13
    webdawg13 Member Posts: 77

    TheHB said:

    James Franklin had an absolute STACKED roster for a few years with Trace McSorley, Saquon Barkely, Chris Godwin, Juwan Johnson, Miles Sanders etc. Anyone with a fucking pulse could have won with that group.

    Was he responsible for getting those guys? I honestly don't know, but if he was, that's SOMETHING. Franklin doesn't excite me, but if he can keep the good players from leaving the state, keep the island people coming to Seattle and re-establish the California connections, he might be good here.

    He could also be another Willingham.
    I dont want Franklin but im pretty sure at this point he isn’t willingham
    Franklin reminds me more of a Cristobol. Shitty coach but is a very good recruiter. Currently #5 ranked recruiting class. I also don't want him simply for the fact he was the original dumbass that employed Jon Don.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    After seeing Johnny Majors I am all in on Campbell coming here and winning the national championship and recruiting Tony Dorsett

    I stand by Franklin being Petersen. Good and bad. Maybe a better recruiter but that might be Penn State being a better destination than UW