I hate to say it
Comments
-
TTJ leads an insufferable, miserable life. Trust me.Canadawg said:
I always wonder how people like you exist. Do you think Alabama is the first program to dominate for a while? Alabama isn't even considered the strongest all time program by many metrics. It's usually an OSU or OK discussion at the top with Bama and USC next.TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
You probably thought Nebraska was never going to lose a game a few decades ago didn't ya
-
Whoa there my canuck, guy. Bamma has like 18 natties. Ohio State has 8. OU has 7.Canadawg said:
I always wonder how people like you exist. Do you think Alabama is the first program to dominate for a while? Alabama isn't even considered the strongest all time program by many metrics. It's usually an OSU or OK discussion at the top with Bama and USC next.TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
You probably thought Nebraska was never going to lose a game a few decades ago didn't ya
Bammer is the GOAT rather easily. The two most successful coaches of all time both coached at Bammer. -
Yeah but a bunch of those natties are pretty sketchy. All I'm saying is they are no different overall compared to the other 4 or 5 elite programs. They will trend down when Saban leaves like all dynasties doYellowSnow said:
Whoa there my canuck, guy. Bamma has like 18 natties. Ohio State has 8. OU has 7.Canadawg said:
I always wonder how people like you exist. Do you think Alabama is the first program to dominate for a while? Alabama isn't even considered the strongest all time program by many metrics. It's usually an OSU or OK discussion at the top with Bama and USC next.TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
You probably thought Nebraska was never going to lose a game a few decades ago didn't ya
Bammer is the GOAT rather easily. The two most successful coaches of all time both coached at Bammer. -
Seriously who dafuq was calling plays… and JD was in the booth finally
-
What metric is there that matters other than titles?Canadawg said:
I always wonder how people like you exist. Do you think Alabama is the first program to dominate for a while? Alabama isn't even considered the strongest all time program by many metrics. It's usually an OSU or OK discussion at the top with Bama and USC next.TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
You probably thought Nebraska was never going to lose a game a few decades ago didn't ya -
Current Saban > Michigan State Saban. He's a living legend now.TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
-
That was so long ago. His name has quite a bit more prestige behind it now. I’m not saying he would have Bama like success, but if you gave him three years at Oregon Stats, he’s winning 10+TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
-
He also established LSU in between those two stints winning a title. LSU sucked prior to him coaching there. If you don’t think saban would create a top 10 program anywhere you don’t think coaching is important.chuck said:
Current Saban > Michigan State Saban. He's a living legend now.TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
-
Yes because Nick Saban was flashing six natty rings when he was at Michigan State.TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
He could turn them in to a monster now if he wanted to. -
Except they are different. No other program has won six national titles in the short 11 year span that Saban and Bama have. And that's to say nothing of the fact that they've done so in what is a much more competitive college football landscape that what other dominant runs by programs were featured in. They're far and away the best program of all time, and this most recent run is far and away the most impressive span. It's not really that close.Canadawg said:
Yeah but a bunch of those natties are pretty sketchy. All I'm saying is they are no different overall compared to the other 4 or 5 elite programs. They will trend down when Saban leaves like all dynasties doYellowSnow said:
Whoa there my canuck, guy. Bamma has like 18 natties. Ohio State has 8. OU has 7.Canadawg said:
I always wonder how people like you exist. Do you think Alabama is the first program to dominate for a while? Alabama isn't even considered the strongest all time program by many metrics. It's usually an OSU or OK discussion at the top with Bama and USC next.TTJ said:
Michigan State thinks this shit is hilarious. There’s only one Bammer, friend.RoadDawg55 said:
They would take off and dominate the conference. I even think he would at Oregon State and WSU. Recruits are going where he’s at.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I don’t think Nick Saban could win at UCLA with any consistencyDerekJohnson said:
You don't think Don James or Pete Carroll could win at UCLA?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
UW isn’t UCLADerekJohnson said:
I would have agreed with you in 2002. But we later saw at UCLA that that wasn't true.LongDukDong said:I liked Neu. His teams got softer when he got his own guys, but he was smart and would have adjusted. He could recruit too.
You probably thought Nebraska was never going to lose a game a few decades ago didn't ya
Bammer is the GOAT rather easily. The two most successful coaches of all time both coached at Bammer.








